A number of scholars have criticized the ways in which property law simplifies nature. Such reductive simplifications are seen as being reliant upon a claim to mastery and dominion that is belied by the essential complexity and dynamism of the natural world. Drawing from a close reading of a property-boundary dispute involving the historical movements of the Missouri River, I supplement this account by revealing the ways in which legal simplication is itself complicated: that is, both dependent on considerable amounts of practical work, and subject to breakdown, ambiguity, and contradiction. Rather than a singular river, made legible through the unfolding of a unitary legal logic, I reveal several conflicting ‘rivers’ produced through property law. I conclude by trying to make sense of property as a set of practices that serve to produce the ‘effect’ of property. These practices, while often messy and contradictory, are, nevertheless, significant in the installation of property as a powerful organizing device through which the social world is made meaningful.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnesGStanfieldSBarthelK, 2000, “Land registration modernization in developing economies: A discussion of the main problems in Central/Eastern Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean”URISA Journal12(4) 27–36
2.
BeckR E, 1967, “The wandering Missouri River: A study in accretion law”North Dakota Law Review43428–466
3.
BennettJ A, 1991, “Geometry and surveying in early-seventeenth century England”Annals of Science48345–354
4.
BlomleyN, 2003, “Law, property, and the spaces of violence: The frontier, the survey, and the grid”Annals of the Association of American Geographers93121–141
5.
BlomleyN, 2004Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property (Routledge, New York)
6.
BlomleyN, 2005a, “Flowers in the bathtub: Boundary crossings at the public–private divide”Geoforum36281–296
7.
BlomleyN, 2005b, “The borrowed view: Privacy, propriety, and the entanglements of property”Law and Social Inquiry30617–661
8.
BlomleyN, forthcoming, “Enclosure, common rights, and the property of the poor”Social and Legal Studies
9.
BlomleyNDelaneyDFordR (Eds), 2001The Legal Geographies Reader: Law, Power and Space (Blackwell, Oxford)
10.
BobbioN, 1989Democracy and Dictatorship: The Nature and Limits of State Power (Polity Press, Cambridge)
11.
BorrowsJ, 1997, “Living between water and rocks: First Nations, environmental planning, and democracy”University of Toronto Law Journal47417–468
BrownCRobillardW GWilsonD A, 1986Boundary Control and Legal Principles (John Wiley, New York)
14.
BrücknerMPooleK, 2002, “The plot thickens: Surveying manuals, drama, and the materiality of narrative form in early modern England”English Literary History69617–648
15.
CalowPPettsG E (Eds), 1992The Rivers Handbook, volume 1 (Blackwell, Oxford)
16.
CampL S, 1977, “Land accretion and avulsion: The battle of Blackbird Bend”Nebraska Law Review56814–835
17.
ChurchM, 1992, “Channel morphology and typology”, in The Rivers Handbook, volume 1 Eds CalowPPettsG E (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 126–143
18.
CooperD, 2007, “Opening up ownership: Community belonging, belongings and the productive life of property”Law and Social Inquiry32625–664
19.
DelaneyD, 2003, “Beyond the word: Law as a thing of this world”, in Law and Geography Eds HolderJHarrisonC (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 67–83
20.
DelaneyD, 2004, “Tracing displacement: Or evictions in the nomosphere”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22847–860
21.
DelleJ A, 1999, “‘A good and easy speculation’: Spatial conflict, collusion and resistance in late sixteenth-century Munster, Ireland”International Journal of Historical Archaeology311–35
22.
Favis-MortlockDde BoerD, 2003, “Simple at heart? Landscape as a self-organizing complex system”, in Contemporary Meanings in Physical Geography Eds TrudgillSRoyA (Edward Arnold, London) pp 127–172
23.
FlushmanB S, 2002Water Boundaries: Demystifying Land Boundaries Adjacent to Tidal or Navigable Waters (John Wiley, New York)
24.
GeislerC, 2000, “Property pluralism”, in Property and Values: Alternatives to Public and Private Ownership Eds GeislerCDanekerG (Island Press, Washington DC) pp 65–86
25.
GivenM, 2002, “Maps, fields, and boundary cairns: Demarcation and resistance in colonial Cyprus”International Journal of Historical Archaeology61–22
HamiltonJ W, 2002, “Theories of categorization: A case study of cheques”Canadian Journal of Law and Society17115–138
28.
HibbittsB, 1994“Making sense of metaphors: Visuality, aurality, and the reconfiguration of American legal discourse”Cardozo Law Review16229–356
29.
IngoldT, 2000, “Making culture and weaving the world”, in Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture Ed. Graves-BrownP M (Routledge, London) pp 50–71
30.
KaloJ L, 2000, “The changing face of the shoreline: Public and private rights to the natural and nourished dry sand beaches of North Carolina”North Carolina Law Review781869–1897
31.
KeylockC, 2003, “The natural science of geomorphology”, in Contemporary Meanings in Physical Geography Eds TrudgillSRoyA (Edward Arnold, London) pp 87–102
32.
KimballR L, 1986, “Accretion and severed mineral estates”University of Chicago Law Review53232–257
33.
KnightonD, 1998Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective (Edward Arnold, London)
34.
LakoffG, 1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
35.
LargeD, 1973, “This land is whose land? Changing concepts of land as property”Wisconsin Law Review41039–1083
36.
LatourB, 2000, “The Berlin key or how to do things without words”, in Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture Ed. Graves-BrownP M (Routledge, London) pp 10–21
LawJ, 2002, “Objects and spaces”Theory Culture and Society19(5/6) 91–105
39.
LovettJ A, 1994, “Comment: Batture, ordinary high water, and the Louisiana levee servitude”Tulane Law Review69561–607
40.
MassariK M, 1973, “Comment: Alluvion, islands, and sand bars”Tulane Law Review47367–383
41.
MitchellT, 2002, Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, and Modernity (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
42.
NedelskyJ, 1990, “Law, boundaries, and the bounded self”Representations30162–189
43.
PainterJ, 2006, “Prosaic geographies of stateness”Political Geography25752–774
44.
PelsDHetheringtonKVandenbergheF, 2002, “The status of the object; performances, mediations and techniques”Theory, Culture and Society19(5/6) 1–21
45.
PickeringA, 1995The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
46.
PietzW, 2002, “Material considerations: On the historical forensics of contract”Theory Culture and Society19(5/6) 35–50
47.
PottageA, 1994, “The measure of land”The Modern Law Review57361–384
48.
RoseC, 1994Property and Persuasion (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
49.
RoseC, 1998, “The several futures of property: Of cyberspace and folk tales, emission trades and ecosystems”Minnesota Law Review83129–182
50.
RoyALaneS, 2003, “Putting the morphology back into fluvial geomorphology: The case of river meanders and tributary junctions”, in Contemporary Meanings in Physical Geography Eds TrudgillSRoyA (Edward Arnold, London) pp 103–126
51.
ScottJ, 1998Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
52.
SingerJ, 2000Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
53.
SteinbergT, 1995Slide Mountain: Or, the Folly of Owning Nature (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
54.
StoneB HSmithJ AAndressS EThomasL C, 1995, “Site approval of casinos in Mississippi: A matter of statutory approval or a roll of the dice”Mississippi Law Journal64363–438
55.
VandergeestPPelusoN J, 2001, “Territorialization and state power in Thailand”, in The Legal Geographies Reader: Law, Power and Space Eds BlomleyNDelaneyDFordR (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 176–186
56.
VarleyA, 2002, “Private or public: Debating the meaning of tenure legalization”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26449–461
57.
VerderyK, 1996What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next? (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
58.
WhiteR, 1995The Organic Machine: The Remaking of the Columbia River (Hill and Wang, New York)
59.
YoungI M, 1990Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
