This paper contributes to the debates on relational conceptualisations of space by focusing on how these notions are used by policy makers in particular governance contexts. It uses the example of Milan, where recent urban interventions and a particular fragmented governance structure demonstrate how overstated accounts of relationality can take hold in disempowering ways. It argues that, as Milan tries to become connected into the global flows of capital by ‘going up’ the city league, most Milanese are becoming disconnected from the democratic government of their city. As such, an excessive emphasis on connectivity and fluid conceptions of space risks losing sight of the particularities and uniqueness of places and the territorial nature of problems in cities today. It concludes that, theoretically, we still need a relational concept of space but one which denounces unevenness and spatial injustice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJShinMBettoniG, 2002, “City versus metropolis: The Northern League in the Milan metropolitan area”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26266–283
BialasiewiczL, 2006, “Geographies of production and the contexts of politics: Dis-location and new ecologies of fear in the Veneto città diffusa”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2441–67
Bolocan GoldsteinM, 2002, “Governo locale e operazioni urbanistiche a Milano tra gli anni '80 e '90”Urbanistica11990–102
16.
Bolocan GoldsteinM, 2006, “Urbanistica in cerca di rappresentanza”, in Milano oltre Milano: Racconti della città che cambia 1990–2005 Eds Consorzio Metis–Politecnico di Milano (Skira, Milan) pp 1–2
BrennerN, 2001, “The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration”Progress in Human Geography25591–614
23.
BrennerNTheodoreN, 2002Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe (Blackwell, Oxford)
24.
CameronS, 2003, “Gentrification, housing re-differentiation and urban regeneration: ‘going for growth’ in Newcastle upon Tyne”Urban Studies20367–382
25.
CastellsM, 1999, “The informational city is a dual city: Can it be reversed?”, in High Technology and Low Income Communities Eds SchonDSanyalBMitchellW (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 25–42
26.
CiborraC, 2005, “Note fenomenologiche su Milano e le reti”, in Milano, nodo della rete globale Eds MagattiM (Bruno Mondadori, Milan) pp 83–111
27.
CognettiFCottinoP, 2003, “Developers of a different kind: New forms of community in a laissez faire Milan”City7228–235
28.
di MilanoComune, 1990Milano, le decisione prese: Piani e progetti dal 1988–1990 (Fabri Editori, Milan)
29.
di MilanoComune, 1995Nove parche per Milano (Ente Autonomo laTriennale di Milano, Milan)
DelladetsimaP M, 2003, “The Olympic village: A redevelopment marathon in Greater Athens”, in The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities Eds MoulaertFSwyngedouwERodriguezA (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 65–89
32.
Dell'AgneseEVitaleT, 2007, “Rom e sinti: Una galassia di minoranze”, in Tra identità ed integrazione: passato e presente delle minoranze nell'Europa mediterranea Eds AmiottiGRosinaA (a cura di) (FrancoAngeli, Milan) pp 123–145
33.
DematteisGGovernaF (Eds), 2005Territorialità, sviluppo locale, sostenibilità: Il modelo SLoT (FrancoAngeli, Milan)
34.
D'OvidioM, 2005The Cultural Industries in Post-Fordist Cities: Proximity as a Creative Resource? The Fashion Industry in Milan and London PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology and Social Sciences, Università di Milano–Bicocca, Milan
FootM, 2000, “The urban periphery, myth and reality: Milan, 1950–1990”City47–26
38.
FootM, 2001Milan Since the Miracle: City, Culture and Identity (Berg, Oxford)
39.
GinsborgP, 1990, “Family, culture and politics in contemporary Italy”, in Essays on Mass and Popular Culture Eds BaranskiZLumleyR (Macmillan, London) pp 21–49
40.
GinsborgP, 2001Italy and its Discontents (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
41.
Gonzalez CeballosS, 2003, “The role of the Guggenheim Bilbao Museum in the development of urban entrepreneurial practices in Bilbao”International Journal of Iberian Studies16177–186
42.
GonzalezS, 2006, “Scalar narratives in Bilbao: A cultural politics of scales approach to the study of urban policy”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research30836–857
43.
GrahamSMarvinS, 2001Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (Routledge, London)
44.
GraziosiS, 1988, “Le aree industriali dismesse nel comune di Milano: Rilievo e proposte per una strategia sociale di riuso”, in Milano Dismessa Eds GraziosiSMangoniL (Unione di Milano, ACLI, Consorzio cooperative e lavoratori, Milan) pp 62–64
HallPPainK (Eds), 2006The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-city Regions in Europe (Earthscan, London)
47.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Postmodernity (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
48.
HealeyP, 2006, “Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning”European Planning Studies14525–546
49.
HealeyP, 2007Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for our Times (Routledge, London)
50.
HubbardP, 1996, “Urban design and city regeneration: Social representations of entrepreneurial landscapes”Urban Studies331441–1461
51.
Il Sole 24 ore2005, “Il nuovo rinascimento di Milano”, 6 February
52.
IndovinaF, 1990, “La città diffusa”, in La città diffusa Eds IndovinaFMatassoniFSavinoMSerniniMTorresMVettorettoL (IUAV, Venezia) pp 19–45
53.
JonasA, 2006, “Pro scale: Further reflections on the ‘scale debate’ in human geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series31399–406
54.
JonesPIIIWoodwardKMarstonS A, 2007, “Situating flatness”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series32264–276
55.
KingA, 2005Spaces of Global Cultures: Architecture, Urbanism, Identity (Routledge, London)
56.
LarnerWLe HeronR, 2002, “The spaces and subjects of a globalising economy: A situated exploration of method”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20753–774
57.
LeitnerHMillerB, 2007, “Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: A commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series32116–125
58.
LumleyR, 1990States of Emergency: Cultures of Revolt in Italy from 1968 to 1978 (Verso, London)
59.
MagattiM, 2005, “Novum Mediolanum”, in Milano, nodo della rete globale Eds MagattiM (Bruno Mondadori, Milan) pp 19–52
60.
MagattiM (Eds), 2005Milano, nodo della rete globale (Bruno Mondadori, Milan)
61.
MarstonS ASmithN, 2001, “States, scales and households: Limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner”Progress in Human Geography25615–620
62.
MarstonSJonesJ PIIIWoodwardK, 2005, “Human geography without scale”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30416–432
63.
MartinottiG, 2005, “Dalla Scala alle bidonville: è una Milano a due velocità”Corriere della Sera 29 March, page 44
64.
MasseyD, 2004, “Geographies of responsibility”Geografiska Annaler865–18
65.
MasseyD, 2005For Space (Sage, London)
66.
MazzaL, 2004Prove parziali di riforma urbanistica (FrancoAngeli, Milan)
67.
MenkesS, 2004, “Fashion: The regeneration game”International Herald Tribune 25 February
68.
MezzettiPMugnanoSZajczykF, 2003Large Housing Estates in Italy: Overview of Developments and Problems in Milan (RESTATE, Utrecht)
69.
Modern Italy2000, “Italy in the present tense: a roundtable discussion with Paul Ginsborg, Perry Anderson, Simon Parker and John Foot on Paul Ginsborg's L'Italia del tempo presente”5175–191
70.
MoulaertFSwyngedouwERodriguezA, 2003The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
PaasiA, 2004, “Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale”Progress in Human Geography28536–546
73.
PaliddaS, 2000 (Ed.) Socialità e inserimento degli immigrati a Milano (FrancoAngeli, Milan)
74.
PasquiG, 2006, “Chi decide la città: Gli effetti dei grandi interventi sull'arena decisional”, in Milano oltre Milano: Racconti della città che cambia 1990–2005 Eds Consorzio Metis–Politecnico di Milano (Skira, Milan) pp 10–11
75.
PastoreL, 2004, “Tre giganti di vetro in Fiera”La Repubblica 3 July
76.
PianaL, 2005, “New Ligresti City”L'Espresso 26 May
PurcellM, 2003, “Islands of practice and the Marston/Brenner debate: Toward a more synthetic critical human geography”Progress in Human Geography27317–332
79.
RacoM, 2003, “Remaking place and securitising space: Urban regeneration and the strategies, tactics and practices of policing in the UK”Urban Studies401869–1887
SansaFOffedduL, 2007Milano da morire (Rizzoli, Milan)
83.
SantucciG, 2005, “Troppe baraccopoli, la città non ce la fa più”Corriere della Sera 29 March, page 44
84.
SennL, 2005, “Guardare ‘oltre’ le apparenze: Il ruolo nodale dell'economic milanese nello scenario globale”, in Milano, nodo della rete globale Eds MagattiM (Bruno Mondadori, Milan) pp 145–176
85.
ShellerMUrryJ, 2006, “The new mobilities paradigm”Environment and Planning A38207–226
86.
SklairL, 2006, “Iconic architecture and capitalist globalization”City1021–47
87.
SmithN, 2005, “Neo-critical geography, or, the flat pluralist world of business daw”Antipode37887–899
88.
StateraA, 2007, “Lo sviluppatore inmobiliare e la maledizione dei furbetti”La Repubblica 14 May, page 11
TaylorT, 2004World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis (Routledge, London)
91.
TossuttiL, 2001, “Globalization and the ‘new localism’ in northern Italy”Mediterranean Politics664–83
92.
TrigliaC, 1990, “Work and politics in the Third Italy's industrial districts”, in Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy Eds PykeFBecattiniGSengenbergerW (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva) pp 160–184
93.
VicariSMolotchH, 1990, “Building Milan: Alternative machines of growth”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14602–624
94.
VicarioLMartínez MonjeP M, 2003, “Another ‘Guggenheim effect’? The generation of a potentially gentrifiable neighbourhood in Bilbao”Urban Studies402383–2400
