This paper examines everyday living room interactions in which teenage household members conduct ‘tactical’ play in order to temporarily gain access to, and disrupt, the dominant, domestic codes of living room media. The practices of individuals are interpreted, through Michel de Certeau's language of ‘tactics’, as struggles or a series of opportunistic actions which can often reforge these codes of living, precisely because the house ‘rules' are not fixed or deterministic in practice. In these tactical performances of self, the use of media is enmeshed in a host of situated and symbolic action, reaffirming how media and face-to-face interactions are multiply and closely entwined in everyday living room life. This video ethnographic work examines such instances of teenagers appealing to ‘house’ rules and demonstrating domestic helpfulness in order to gain access to media, and the tethering of media to objects through the routine practice of ‘markers' and ‘stalls’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbercrombieNLonghurstB, 1998Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination (Sage, London)
2.
AndersonJ ASchoeningG T, 1996, “The nature of the individual in communication research”, in Constructing the Self in a Mediated World Eds GrodinDLindlofT R (Sage, London) pp 206–225
BellGBlytheMGaverBSengersPWrightP, 2003, “Designing culturally situated technologies for the home”Proceedings to CHI 2003: New Horizons5–10 April, Fort Lauderdale, FL
5.
CieraadI, 1999, “Introduction: anthropology at home”, in At Home: An Anthropology of Domestic Space Ed. CieraadI (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY) 1–13
6.
CrowG, 1989, “The use of the concept of ‘strategy’ in recent sociological literature”Sociology23(1) 1–24
7.
De CerteauM, 1984The Practice of Everyday Life translated by RendallS (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
8.
DishmanE, 2002, “Performative in(ter)ventions: designing future technologies through synergetic performance”, in Teaching Performance Studies Eds StuckyNWimmerC (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL) 235–246
9.
Doheny-FariinaS, 1996The Wired Neighbourhood (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
10.
DreyfusH LSpinosaC, 1997, “Highway bridges and feasts: Heidgegger and Borgmann on how to affirm technology”Continental Philosophy Review30(2) 159–178
11.
FacerKFurlongJFurlongRSutherlandR, 2001, “Home is where the hardware is: young people, the domestic environment and ‘access’ to new technologies”, in Children, Technology and Culture Eds HutchbyIMoran-EllisJ (Routledge, London) pp 13–27
12.
FacerKFurlongJFurlongRSutherlandR, 2003Screen Play: Children and Computing in the Home (Routledge, London)
13.
FrithS, 1996Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
14.
GershunyJAndersonMKendrickS, 1994, “Individual and household strategies”, in Social and Political Economy of the Household Eds AndersonMBechoferFGershunyJ (Oxford University Press, Oxford) 19–67
15.
GoffmanE, 1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
16.
GoodwinC, 2001, “Practices of seeing visual analysis: an ethnomethodological approach”, in Handbook of Visual Analysis Eds Van LeeuwenTJewittC (Sage, London) pp 157–182
17.
GrahamP, 2004End of Adolescence (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
18.
HeathC, 1986Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
HeideggerM, 1971Poetry Language, Thought (HarperCollins, New York)
21.
HemmingsTCrabtreeARoddenT, 2003, “Supporting communication with domestic settings”Proceedings of the 2003 Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics Conference6–8 April, International Federation for Information Processing, Irvine, CA, 119–138
22.
HineC, 2000Virtual Ethnography (Sage, London)
23.
JeffersonG, 1984, “Transcript notation”, in Structures of Social Interaction Eds AtkinsonJHeritageJ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) page ix
24.
LaslettP, 1984, “The family as a knot of individual interests”, in Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of Domestic Group Eds McNettingRWilkR RArnoldE J (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 353–379
25.
LivingstoneS, 2002Young People and New Media (Sage, London)
26.
McCroneD, 1994, “Getting by and making out in Kirkcaldy”, in Social and Political Economy of the Household Eds AndersonMBechhoferFGershunyJ (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, Bucks) pp 68–99
27.
McGinnC, 2002The Making of a Philosopher: My Journey Through Twentieth Century Philosophy (HarperCollins, New York)
28.
MackayH, 2005, “New connections, familiar settings: issues in the ethnographic study of new media use at home”, in Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet Ed. HineC (Berg, Oxford) pp 129–141
29.
MackayHIveyD, 2004Modern Media in the Home (John Libbey, Rome)
30.
MaloneM, 1997Worlds of Talk: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conservation (Polity Press, Cambridge)
31.
MollL CAmantiCNeffDGonzálezN, 1992, “Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms”Theory into Practice31132–141
32.
MooresS, 2000Media and Everyday Life in Modern Society (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
33.
MorleyD, 1986Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure (Comedia, London)
34.
MorleyD, 2000Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity (Routledge, London)
35.
O'BrienJRoddenTRouncefieldMHughesJ, 1999, “At home with the technology: an ethnographic study of a set-top box”ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction6282–308
36.
OskamnVTurtiainenJ, 2004, “Mobile communication as a social stage: meanings of mobile communication in everyday life among teenagers in Finland”New Media Society6319–339
37.
PalenLSalzmanMYoungsE, 2001, “Discovery and integration of mobile communications in everyday life”Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Journal5109–122
38.
RobinsK, 1995, “Cyberspace and the world we live in”, in Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment Eds FeatherstoneMBurrowsR (Sage, London) pp 135–155
SilverstoneR, 1991, “Beneath the bottom line: households and ICTs in an age of the consumer”, PICT Research Policy Paper 17, Economic and Social Research Council, London
41.
SilverstoneR, 1994Television and Everyday Life (Routledge, London)
42.
SilverstoneRHirschE, 1992Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces (Routledge, London)
43.
TolmiePPycockJDigginsTMacleanAKarsentyA, 2002, “Unremarkable computing”Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves (ACM Press, New York) 399–406
44.
TuttD, 2005, “Mobile performances of a teenager”Convergence11(2) 58–75
45.
VenkateshAMazumdarS, 1999, “New information technologies in the home: a study of uses, impacts, and design strategies”, in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, The Power of Imagination Ed. MannT (The Environmental Design Research Association, Edmond, OK) pp 216–220
