Are contemporary metropolitan regions becoming more dispersed? There are theoretical arguments for both concentration and dispersal. The purpose of our research is to establish an empirical base that can help us to understand the evolution of metropolitan spatial structure. Using data for the Los Angeles region from 1980, 1990, and 2000, we identify employment centers and describe spatial trends in the pattern of employment inside and outside these centers. We find: (1) a remarkable degree of stability in the system of centers; (2) an increase in the average distance of jobs from the traditional core; (3) the emergence and growth of employment centers; (4) the rapid growth of dispersed employment in outer suburbs. These trends appear to defy simple models of urban evolution and call for a more nuanced portrayal of contemporary regions and the dynamics underlying spatial organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnasAArnottRSmallK A, 1998, “Urban spatial structure”Journal of Economic Literature361426–1464
2.
BaerwaldT, 1982, “Land use change in suburban clusters and corridors”Transportation Research Recordnumber 861, 7–12
3.
BaumontCErturCLe GalloJ, 1999, “Spatial analysis of employment and population density: the case of the agglomeration of Dijon”Geographical Analysis36146–176
4.
BerryB, 1981Comparative Urbanization: Divergent Path in the 20th Century2nd edition (St Martin's Press, New York)
5.
BeyersW, 2000, “Cyberspace or human space: wither cities in the age of telecommunications?”, in Cities in the Telecommunications Age: The Fracturing of Geographies Eds AoyamaYWheelerJBarneyW (Routledge, New York) pp 161–180
6.
BogartWFerryC, 1999, “Employment centres in Greater Cleveland: evidence of evolution in a formerly monocentric city”Urban Studies362099–2110
7.
BuntingTFilionPPrestonH, 2002, “Density gradients in Canadian metropolitan regions, 1971–96: differential patterns of central area and suburban growth and change”Urban Studies392531–2552
8.
CastellsMHallP, 1994Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-first Century Industrial Complexes (Routledge, London)
9.
CerveroRWuK-L, 1997, “Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay area”Environment and Planning A29865–886
10.
ChenH, 1996, “The simulation of a proposed non-linear dynamic urban growth model”Annals of Regional Science30305–319
11.
ChinitzB, 1991, “A framework for speculating about future urban growth patterns in the US”Urban Studies28939–959
12.
CoffeyWShearmurR, 2002, “Agglomeration and dispersion of high-order service employment in the Montreal Metropolitan Region, 1981–96”Urban Studies39359–378
13.
CraigSNgP, 2001, “Using quantile smoothing splines to identify employment subcenters in a multicentric urban area”Journal of Urban Economics49100–120
14.
EricksonR, 1983, “The evolution of the suburban space-economy”Urban Geography495–121
15.
ForstallR LGreeneR P, 1997, “Defining job concentrations: the Los Angeles case”Urban Geography18705–739
16.
FujitaM, 1989Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
17.
GarreauJ, 1991Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (Doubleday, New York)
18.
GiulianoG, 1998, “Information technology, work patterns and intrametropolitan location: a case study”Urban Studies351077–1095
19.
GiulianoGSmallK, 1991, “Subcenters in the Los Angeles region”Regional Science and Urban Economics21163–182
20.
GordonPRichardsonH, 1996, “Beyond polycentricity: the dispersed metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970–1980”Journal of the American Planning Association62289–295
21.
GordonPRichardsonHWongH, 1986, “The distribution of population and employment in a polycentric city: the case of Los Angeles”Environment and Planning A18161–173
22.
GordonPRichardsonHYuG, 1998, “Metropolitan and non-metropolitan employment trends in the US: recent evidence and implications”Urban Studies351037–1057
23.
GottliebP, 1994, “Amenities as economic development tools: is there enough evidence?”Economic Development Quarterly8270–285
24.
GottliebP, 1995, “Residential amenities, firm location and economic development”Urban Studies321413–1436
25.
GrahamSMarvinS, 1996Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places (Routledge, London)
26.
HalsteadJ MDellerS C, 1997, “Public infrastructure in economic development and growth: evidence from rural manufacturers”Journal of the Community Development Society2897–116
27.
HartshorneTMullerP, 1989, “The suburban downtown and urban economic development today”, in Sources of Metropolitan Growth Eds MillsEMacDonaldJ (Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 147–158
28.
HeikkilaEGordonPKimJPeiserRRichardsonHDale-JohnsonD, 1989, “What happened to the CBD-distance gradient?: land values in a polycentric city”Environment and Planning A21221–232
29.
HendersonVMitraA, 1996, “The new urban landscape: developers and edge cities”Regional Science and Urban Economics26613–643
30.
JacksonK, 1985Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States (Oxford University Press, New York)
31.
JordanSRossJUsowskiK, 1998, “US suburbanization in the 1980's”Regional Science and Urban Economics28611–627
32.
KloostermanRMusterdS, 2001, “Polycentric urban region: as a research concept”Urban Studies38619–629
33.
KotkinJ, 2000The New Geography: How the Digital Revolution is Reshaping the American Landscape (Random House, New York)
McDonaldJPratherP, 1994, “Suburban employment centres: the case of Chicago”Urban Studies31201–218
36.
McMillenD, 2001, “Nonparametric employment subcenter identification”Journal of Urban Economics50448–473
37.
McMillenD, 2003, “Identifying sub-centers using contiguity matrices”Journal of Urban Studies4057–69
38.
McMillenDLesterW, 2003, “Evolving subcenters: employment and population densities in Chicago, 1970–2020”Journal of Housing Economics1260–81
39.
McMillenDMcDonaldJ, 1997, “A nonparametric analysis of employment density in a polycentric city”Journal of Regional Science37591–612
40.
McMillenDMcDonaldJ, 1998, “Suburban subcenters and employment density in metropolitan Chicago”Journal of Urban Economics43157–180
41.
MullerP, 1981Contemporary Suburban America (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
42.
MullerP, 2004, “Transportation and urban form: stages in the spatial evolution of the American metropolis”, in The Geography of Urban Transportation3rd edition, Eds HansonSGiulianoG (Guilford Press, New York) pp 59–85
43.
MunizIGalindoAGarciaM, 2003, “Cubic spline population density functions and satellite city delimitation: the case of Barcelona”Urban Studies401303–1321
44.
ScottA, 1988Metropolis: From Division of Labor to Urban Form (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
45.
SmallKSongS, 1994, “Population and employment densities: structure and change”Journal of Urban Economics36292–313
46.
SullivanA, 1986, “A general equilibrium model with agglomerative economies and decentralized employment”Journal of Urban Economics2055–74
47.
ZhangYSasakiK, 1997, “Effects of subcenter formation on urban spatial structure”Regional Science and Urban Economics27297–324
48.
ZhangYSasakiK, 2000, “Spatial structure in an open city with a subcenter”Annals of Regional Science3437–53
