The paper explores green markets as relational effects. The aim is to show that the green markets of the forest industry did not develop and expand through green consumption behaviour but were performed by a hybrid set of actors including environmental nongovernmental organisations, publishing companies, certification agencies, market researchers, and critical citizens. The spatiality of greening is expressed by showing how spatial relations, territorial spaces, and spatial differences were created and utilised within the process. Empirically, the focus is on the Russian forest sector. By analysing two examples, a conflict over old-growth forests, and a forest certification process, the study indicates how spatial reorientation and the westward export of the forest industry have resulted in greening timber markets in various parts of the Russian forest peripheries.
AminA, 2002, “Spatialities of globalisation”Environment and Planning A34385–399
4.
BachJStarkD, 2004, “Link, search, interact: The co-evolution of NGOs and interactive technology”Theory, Culture and Society21101–117
5.
BackmanC, 1999, “The Siberian forest sector: Challenges and prospects”Post-Soviet Geography and Economics40453–469
6.
BarnesT, 2002, “Performing economic geography: Two men, two books, and a cast of thousands”Environment and Planning A34487–512
7.
BolotovaAVorobiovD, 2002, “Local case study 2: Svetogorsk pulp and paper mill”, in Environmental Transformations in the Russian Forest Industry: Key Actors and Local Developments Eds KortelainenJKotilainenJ (Karelian Institute, University of Joensuu) pp 97–108
ButtelF, 1993, “Environmentalization and greening: Origins, processes and implications”, in The Greening of Rural Policy: International Perspectives Ed. HarperS (Belhaven Press, London) pp 12–26
11.
CallonM, 1998a, “Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics”, in The Laws of the Markets Ed. CallonM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–57
12.
CallonM, 1998b, “An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology”, in The Laws of the Markets Ed. CallonM. (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 244–269
13.
CallonM, 1999, “Actor-network theory: The market test”, in Actor Network Theory and After Eds LawJHassardJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 181–195
14.
CallonM, 2001, “Actor network theory”, in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Eds SmelserN JBatesP B (Elsevier, Amsterdam) pp 62–66
15.
CallonM, 2004, “The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design”Journal of Center for Information Studies53–10
16.
CallonMMuniesaF, 2005, “Economic markets as calculative collective devices”Organization Studies261229–1250
17.
CallonMMéadelCRabeharisoaV, 2002, “The economy of qualities”Economy and Society31194–217
18.
CastreeN, 2003, “Place: Connection and boundaries in an interdependent world”, in Key Concepts in Geography Eds HollowayS LRiceS PValentineG (Sage, London) pp 165–185
19.
ChaseA, 2001In a Dark Wood: The Flight over Forests and the Myths of Nature (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ)
20.
CrottyJ, 2002, “Economic transition and pollution control in the Russian federation: Beyond pollution intensification?”Europe – Asia Studies54299–316
21.
DemerittD, 2001, “Scientific forest conservation and the statistical picturing of nature's limits in the Progressive-era United States”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19431–459
DudarevGBoltramovichSEfremovD, 2002From Russian Forests to World Markets: A Comparative Analysis of the Northwest Russian Forest Cluster (ETLA, Helsinki)
24.
EversMPtichnikovA, 2003, “Why FSC certification will help to improve forest management in Russia”, in First FSC-certified Wood for Russian PaperAxel Springer, AO Volga, WWF, pp 29–32, http://www.volga-paper.ru/pdf/fsc.pdf
GregsonNRoseG, 2000, “Taking Butler elsewhere: Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18433–452
32.
HayterR, 2003, “‘The war in the woods’: Post-Fordist restructuring, globalization, and the contested remapping of British Columbia's forest economy”Annals of the Association of American Geographers93706–729
33.
HayterRSoyezD, 1996, “Clearcut issues: German environmental pressure and British Columbia forest sector”Geographische Zeitschrift84143–156
34.
HuljusC, 2003, “Certifying 110,000 ha in Koverninsky Leskhos”, in First FSC-certified wood for Russian Paper (Axel Springer, AO Volga, and WWF) pp 25–28, http://www.volga-paper.ru/pdf/fsc/pdf
35.
HuuskonenM, 2005, “Fennoskandian suurin kuusimetsä säästyy hakkuilta” [The largest spruce forest in Fennoscandia will be spared from logging]Helsingin Sanomat 30 January, page A9
36.
Karjalainen1996a, “Enso lopettaa puunostot Karjalan kiistametsistä” [Enso stops buying wood from disputed forests in Karelia] 23 October, page 3
37.
Karjalainen1996b, “Enso ryhtyy yhteistyöhön WWF: N kanssa Karjalassa” [Enso starts collaboration with WWF in Karelia] 20 January, page 20
38.
KärnäJJuslinHSteineckF, 2000, “Green marketing of paper products in Finland and Sweden”Paper and Timber82182–188
39.
KärnäJSteineckFJuslinH, 2001, “Green marketing of sawn timber and wood based panels in Finland and Sweden”Journal of Forest Economics7145–168
KelleyD RStunkelK RWescottR R, 1976The Economic Superpowers and the Environment: The United States, the Soviet Union and Japan (W H Freeman, San Francisco, CA)
42.
KisserM IKirschtenU, 1995, “Reduction of waste water emissions in the Austrian pulp and paper industry”, in Successful Environmental Policy: A Critical Evaluation of 24 Cases Eds JänickeMWeidnerH (Sigma, Berlin) pp 89–103
43.
KonttinenJ, 2005, “Euroopan suurimmat metsät kaatuvat hitaasti” [The largest forests in Europe fall slowly]Helsingin Sanomat 9 May, page B8
44.
KortelainenJ, 1999, “River as an actor-network: Forest industry utilization of the Finnish lake and river systems”Geoforum30235–247
45.
KortelainenJ, 2004, “Forest regimes as heterogeneous networks”, in Politics of Forests: Northern Forest Industry Regimes in the Age of Globalisation Eds LehtinenASætherBDonner-AmnellJ (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 107–131
46.
KortelainenJKotilainenJ, 2003, “Ownership changes and local development in the Russian pulp and paper industry”Eurasian Geography and Economics44384–402
47.
LaineMPeltonenLHailaY, 1998, “Local ‘instigating disputes’ and the politicization of the environment: The case of Tampere, Finland”Advances in Human Ecology7161–206
LawJUrryJ, 2004, “Enacting the social”Economy and Society33390–410
50.
LehtinenA, 2004, “Russian Taiga: Regional fabrication of the federal Taiga”, in Politics of Forests: Northern Forest Industry Regimes in the Age of Globalisation Eds LehtinenASætherBDonner-AmnellJ (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 87–106
51.
LockieSLyonsKLawrenceG, 2000, “Constructing ‘green’ foods: Corporate capital, risk, and organic farming in Australia and New Zealand”Agriculture and Human Values17315–322
52.
MacKenzieD, 2004, “The big, bad wolf and the rational market: Portfolio insurance, the 1987 crash and the performativity of economics”Economy and Society33303–334
53.
MacKenzieDMilloY, 2003, “Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivates exchange”American Journal of Sociology109107–145
54.
MasseyD, 2004, “Geographies of responsibility”Geografiska Annaler B865–18
55.
MeidingerE, 2003, “Forest certification as a global civil society regulatory institution”, in Social and Political Dimensions of Forest Certification Eds MeidingerEElliottCOestenG (Forstbuch, Remagen-Oberwinter) pp 265–289
56.
MutanenAViitanenJToppinenAHänninenRHolopainenP, 2005, “Forest resources, production and exports of roundwood and sawnwood from Russia”, WP 9, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki
57.
NehmF, 2003, “Why the good stewardship of forests in Russia is important for users of printing paper in Germany”, in First FSC-certified Wood for Russian Paper (Axel Springer, AO Volga, and WWF) pp 33–39, http://www.volga-paper.ru/pdf/fsc.pdf
58.
OksaJRannikkoPVarisE, 1997, “Sozio-ökonomische Bedeutung der Forstwirtschaft in der Kardien” [Socioeconomic significance of forestry in Karelia]AFZ Wald52747–748
59.
O'RourkeD, 2005, “Market movements: Nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption”Journal of Industrial Ecology9115–128
60.
PaasiA, 2004, “The changing discourses on political boundaries: Mapping the backgrounds, contexts and contents”, in B/Ordering Space Eds van HoutumHKramschOZierhoferW (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 18–31
61.
ParkJGrinV I, 2003, “The long road to certification of wood supply”, in First FSC-certified Wood for Russian Paper (Axel Springer, AO Volga, and WWF) pp 17–24, http://www.volga-paper.ru/pdf/fsc.pdf
62.
PeattieK, 2001, “Golden goose or wild goose? The hunt for the green consumer”Business Strategy and the Environment10187–199
63.
ReddyW M, 1984The Rise of Market Culture: The Textile Trade and French Society, 1750–900 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
64.
Rosiiskaia Gazeta1999, “Drovoseki, von iz lesoseki” [Lumberjacks, get out of the forest] 27 October
65.
RubzovB V, 2003, “Success for the forestry authority of Kovernino: The first FSC certification in Russia of a papermill supplier”, in First FSC-certified Wood for Russian Paper (Axel Springer, AO Volga, and WWF) pp 13–16, http://www.volga-paper.ru/pdf/fsc.pdf
SætherB, 1998, “Environmental improvements in the Norwegian pulp and paper industry: From place and government to space and market”Norsk Geografisk Tidskrift52181–194
68.
SczerszynskiBHeimWWatertonC, 2003, “Introduction”, in Nature Performed: Environment, Culture and Performance Eds SczerszynskiBHeimWWatertonC (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–14
69.
SheppardE, 2002, “The spaces and times of globalization: Place, scale, networks and positionality”Economic Geography78307–330
70.
SoyezD, 2002, “Environmental knowledge, the power of framing and industrial change”, in Knowledge, Industry and Environment: Institutions and Innovation in Territorial Perspective Eds HayterRLe HeronR (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 187–208
71.
ThriftN, 1996Spatial Formations (Sage, London)
72.
ThriftN, 2001, “‘It's a romance, not the finance, that makes business worth pursuing’: Disclosing a new market culture”Economy and Society30412–432
73.
TsouvalisJ, 2000A Critical Geography of Britain's State Forests (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
74.
TysiachnioukMReismanJ, 2002, “Transnational environmental organisations and the Russian forest sector”, in Environmental Transformations in the Russian Forest Industry: Key Actors and Local Development Eds KortelainenJKotilainenJ (Karelian Institute, University of Joensuu) pp 56–71
75.
ValtonenKJuslinHLaineP, 1995, “Metsäteollisuuden vihreät markkinat” [Green markets of the forest industry]Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantojanumber 578 (Finnish Forest Institute, Helsinki)
76.
VorobiovD, 1999, “Transboundary movement toward the saving of the Karelian forests”, in Towards a Sustainable Future: Environmental Activism in Russia and the United States Eds TysiachnioukM SMcCarthyG W (Institute of Chemistry of St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg) pp 229–242
