In this study I tested the elastic-city hypothesis within a nonmetropolitan environment. Elastic cities are defined as employing aggressive annexation strategies that result in more effective planning control over the city-region, higher population increases, stronger tax bases, and healthier urban-regional economies than those of nonelastic cities. Principal component analysis was used to analyze and model the elasticity of British Columbia's approximately 100 municipal governments for a thirty-year period, 1971–2001. The findings do not completely support the correlation between a municipality's elastic boundary and growth or development. In fact, the picture is more complex than suggested by Rusk's elastic-cities concept. Annexing municipalities do not exhibit stronger population growth, newer dwellings, or economic development when compared with nonannexing municipalities. Annexation may be contributing to rural-urban sprawl rather than more-compact development patterns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsonMHardtM, 1990, “Municipal annexations within major metropolitan areas, United States: 1980–86”Sociology and Social Research7549–51.
2.
Aryeetey-AttohSJonesMorrow HACostaF JMonroeC BSommersG G, 1998, “Central-city distress in Ohio's elastic cities: Regional and local policy responses”Urban Geography19735–756.
3.
AustinA, 1999, “Politics vs economics: Evidence from municipal annexation”Journal of Urban Economics45501–532.
4.
BarlowI, 1981Spatial Dimensions of Urban Government (Research Studies Press, New York).
5.
BatelyW LSmithP J, 1981, “The role of territory in political conflict in metropolitan fringe areas”, in The Rural–Urban Fringe: Canadian Perspectives (York University-Atkinson College, Downsview, ON) pp 199–217.
6.
BennettR, 1997, “Administrative systems and economic spaces”Regional Studies31323–336.
7.
BeyersWNelsonP, 2000, “Contemporary development forces in the nonmetropolitan west: New insights from rapidly growing communities”Journal of Rural Studies16459–474.
8.
BishR, 1990Local Government in British Columbia2nd edition, Union of British Columbia Municipalities, Richmond, BC.
9.
BlairJ PStaleyS RZhangZ, 1996, “The central elasticity hypothesis: A critical appraisal of Rusk's theory of urban development”Journal of the American Planning Association62345–353.
10.
BlairR, 2001, “Managing urban growth: Can the policy tools approach improve effectiveness?”Public Works Management & Policy6102–113.
11.
BradburyJ, 1980, “Instant resource towns policy in British Columbia, 1965–1972”Plan Canada2019–38.
12.
BreenECostaFHendonW, 1986, “Annexation: An economic analysis: Whether a small village or town should annex adjacent land is a cost/revenue problem”American Journal of Economics and Sociology45159–172.
13.
British Columbia, 2000Managing Changes to Local Government Structure in British Columbia: A Review and Program GuideLocal Government Structure Branch, Ministry of Municipal Affairs, Province of British Columbia.
14.
BromleyD GSmithJ, 1973, “The historical significance of annexation as a social process”Land EconomicsXLIX294–309.
15.
BryantCJosephA, 2001, “Canada's rural population: Trends in space and implications in place”The Canadian Geographer45132–137.
16.
BryantCRusswurmLMcLellanA, 1982The City's Countryside: Land and its Management in the Rural-Urban Fringe (Longman, London).
17.
BunchBStrauss, 1992, “Municipal consolidation: An analysis of the financial benefits for fiscally distressed municipalities”Urban Affairs Quarterly27615–629.
18.
BuntingTFilionPPristonH, 2002, “Density gradients in Canadian metropolitan regions, 1971–96: Differential patterns of central area and suburban growth and change”Urban Studies392531–2552.
19.
BuntingTWalksA RFilionP, 2004, “The uneven geography of housing affordability stress in Canadian Metropolitan Areas”Housing Studies19361–394.
20.
CarrJFeiockR, 2001, “State annexation ‘constraints’ and the frequency of municipal annexation”Political Research Quarterly54459–470.
21.
CarruthersJUlfarssonG, 2002, “Fragmentation and sprawl: Evidence from interregional analysis”Growth and Change: A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy33312–340.
22.
CoxKJonasA, 1993, “Urban development, collective consumption and the politics of metropolitan fragmentation”Political Geography128–37.
23.
DahmsFMcCombJ, 1999, “‘Counterurbanization’, interaction and functional change in a rural amenity area: A Canadian example”Journal of Rural Studies15129–146.
24.
DanielsT, 1999When City and Country Collide: Managing Growth in the Metropolitan Fringe (Island Press, Washington, DC).
25.
DiamantP, 1996Consolidation and the Small Municipality (Brandon University, Brandon, MB).
26.
DuntemanG H, 1989Principal Components Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
27.
DyeT, 1967, “Urban political integration: Conditions associated with annexation in American cities”, in Politics in the Metropolis: A Reader in Conflict and Cooperation Eds DyeTHawkinsB (Merrill, Columbus, OH) pp 424–438.
28.
EdwardsM, 1999, “Annexation: A ‘winner-take-all’ process?”State and Local Government Review31221–231.
29.
EhrensaftPBeemanJ, 1992, “Distance and diversity in nonmetropolitan economies”, in Rural and Small Town Canada Ed. BollmanR (Thompson Educational Publishing, Toronto).
30.
EppleDRomerT, 1989, “On the flexibility of municipal boundaries”Journal of Urban Economics26307–319.
31.
FeiockRCarrJ, 2001, “Incentives, entrepreneurs, and boundary change: A collective action framework”Urban Affairs Review36382–405.
32.
FleischmannA, 1986, “The politics of annexation: A preliminary assessment of competing paradigms”Social Sciences Quarterly67128–142.
33.
FonsecaJ WWongD W, 2000, “Changing patterns of population density in the United States”The Professional Geographer52504–516.
34.
FosterK, 1993, “Exploring the links between political structure and metropolitan growth”Political Geography12523–547.
35.
GonzalezRMehayS, 1987, “Municipal annexation and local monopoly power”Public Choice52245–255.
36.
GoodwinM, 1998, “The governance of rural areas: Some emerging issues and agendas”Journal of Rural Studies145–12.
37.
GottmannJ, 1982, “The basic problem of political geography: The organization of space and the search for stability”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie73340–349.
38.
GrahamKPhillipsSMasloveA, 1998Urban Governance in Canada (Harcourt, Toronto, ON).
39.
HalsethG, 1993, “Communities within communities: Changing areas at Cultus Lake, British Columbia”Journal of Rural Studies9175–187.
40.
HalsethG, 1996, “‘Community’ and land-use planning debate: An example from rural British Columbia”Environment and Planning A281279–1298.
41.
HamiltonD, 2000, “Organizing government structure and governance functions in metropolitan areas in response to growth and change: A critical overview”Journal of Urban Affairs2265–84.
42.
HigginsD, 1986, “The processes of reorganizing local government in Canada”Canadian Journal of Political ScienceXIX219–242.
43.
IsaksonHEckerM, 2001, “Analysis of the influence in the market for underdeveloped urban fringe land”Land Economics7730–41.
44.
JacksonTCurryJ, 2002, “Regional development and land use planning in rural British Columbia: Peace in the woods?”Regional Studies36439–447.
45.
KearnsAPaddisonR, 2000, “New challenges for urban governance: Introduction to the review issue”Urban Studies37845–850.
46.
KeatingM, 1995, “Size, efficiency and democracy: Consolidation, fragmentation and public choice”, in Theories of Urban Politics Eds JudgeStokerGWolmanH (Sage, London) pp 135–159.
47.
KellyE, 1993Managing Community Growth: Policies, Techniques and Impacts (Praeger, Westport, CT).
48.
KlaffVFuguittG, 1978, “Annexation as a factor in the growth of US cities, 1950–60 and 1960–70”Demography151–12.
49.
LindseyG, 2004, “Annexation activity and policy in the United States”, in Redrawing Local Government Boundaries: An International Study of Politics, Procedures and Decisions Ed. MeligranaJ (UBC Press, Vancouver, BC) pp 56–74.
50.
LinerG, 1990, “Annexation rates and institutional constraints”Growth and Change: A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy21(4) 80–94.
51.
LinerG, 1993, “Institutional constraints and annexation activity in the US in the 1970s”Urban Studies301371–1380.
52.
LinerG HMcGregorR R, 1996, “Institutions and the market for annexable land”Growth and Change: A Journal of Urban and Regional Policy27(1) 55–74.
MaassA, 1959Area and Power: A Theory of Local Government (The Free Press, Glencoe, IL).
55.
McDadeTAdairL, 2001, “Defining the “urban in urbanization and health: A factor analysis approach”Social Science and Medicine5355–70.
56.
McGillivrayB, 2000Geography of British Columbia: People and Landscapes in Transition (UBC Press, Vancouver, BC).
57.
MehayS L, 1981, “The expenditure effects of municipal annexation”Public Choice3653–62.
58.
MeligranaJ, 1998, “Boundary and incorporation studies in a growth management framework: Methods for assessing municipal boundary extensions”Applied Geographic Studies3(2) 1–24.
59.
MeligranaJ, 2003, “Developing a planning strategy and vision for rural-urban fringe areas: A case study of British Columbia”Canadian Planning and Policy/Canadian Journal of Urban Research (joint issue) 12(1) 119–141.
60.
MeligranaJ (Ed.), 2004Redrawing Local Government Boundaries: An International Study of Politics, Procedures, and Decisions (UBC Press, Vancouver, BC).
61.
MomerB, 1998, “The small town that grew and grew … a look at rapid urban growth and social issues in Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada”, in Themes and Issues of Canadian Geography II/Beiträge zur Geographie Kanadas II Volume/Band 32 Ed. StadelC (Institut für Geographie der Universität Salzburg, Salzburg) pp 65–80.
62.
OECD, 1994Creating Rural Indicators for Shaping Territorial Policies (OECD, Paris).
63.
PaddisonR, 1983The Fragmented State: The Political Geography of Power (Blackwell, Oxford).
64.
PaddisonR, 2004, “Redrawing local boundaries: Deriving the principles for politically just procedures”, in Redrawing Local Government Boundaries: An International Study of Politics, Procedures and Decisions Ed. MeligranaJ (UBC Press, Vancouver, BC) pp 19–37.
65.
PalmerJ LLindseyG, 2001, “Classifying state approaches to annexation”State and Local Government Review3360–73.
66.
PondBYeatesM, 1994, “Rural/urban land conversion II: Identifying land in transition to urban use”Urban Geography1525–44.
67.
RamseyDByrantC (Eds), 2004The Structure and Dynamics of Rural Territories: Geographical Perspectives (Rural Development Institute, Brandon University, Brandon, MB).
68.
RandallJ EIronsideG R, 1996, “Communities on the edge: An economic geography of resource-dependent communities in Canada”The Canadian Geographer4017–35.
69.
RazinEHazanA, 2001, “Redrawing Israel's local government map: Political decisions, court rulings or popular determination”Political Geography20513–533.
70.
RazinELindseyG, 2001, “Municipal boundary change procedures: Local democracy versus central control”, in New Challenges in Local and Regional Administration Eds WasthWMaxBMaxD (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 1–18.
RuskD, 1999Inside Game/Outside Game: Winning Strategies for Saving Urban America (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
73.
RuskD, 2000, “Growth management: The core regional issue”, in Reflections on Regionalism Ed. KatzB (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) pp 78–107.
74.
RuskD, 2003Cities Without Suburbs: A Census 2000 Update3rd edition (Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC).
75.
SanctonA, 1994Governing Canada's City-Regions: Adapting Form to Function (The Institute for Research on Public Policy, Montreal, QC).
76.
SanctonA, 2000Merger Mania: The Assault on Local Government (Price-Patterson, Westmount, QC).
77.
SanctonA, 2001, “Canadian cities and the new regionalism”Journal of Urban Affairs23543–555.
78.
SeniorD, 1965, “The city region as an administrative unit”Political Quarterly3682–91.
79.
SinghF, 1982The Municipal Structure in Canada. Problems it Creates for Users of Statistics (Statistics Canada, Ottawa, ON).
80.
SkaburskisA, 1992, “Goals for restructuring local government boundaries: Canadian lessons”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy10159–172.
81.
Statistics Canada, 2002Canadian Rural Population Trends Publication No. 2138/E, Agricultural and Agri-Food Canada.
82.
StevensJ, 1996Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).
83.
SojaE, 1975, “The political organization of space in metropolitan areas”, in The Manipulated City: Perspectives on Spatial Structure and Social Issues in Urban America Eds GaleSMooreE G (Maaroufa Press, Chicago, IL) pp 27–39.
84.
TennantP, 1980, “Canada: British Columbia”, in International Handbook on Local Government Reorganization: Contemporary Developments Ed. RowatD (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT) pp 187–196.
85.
TennantPZirnheltD, 1973, “Metropolitan government in Vancouver: The strategy of gentle imposition”Canadian Public Administration16(1) 124–138.
86.
TindalCTindalS, 1999Local Government in Canada5th edition (McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto, ON).
87.
VojnovicI, 1998, “Municipal consolidation in the 1990s: An analysis of British Columbia, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia”Canadian Public Administration41239–282.
88.
WelchR, 2002, “Legitimacy of rural local government in the new governance environment”Journal of Rural Studies18443–459.
89.
YeatesM, 1987, “The extent of urban development in the Windsor–Quebec City axis”The Canadian Geographer3164–69.
