The author develops a multiregional growth model with endogenous amenity and capital accumulation for any number of regions. The simulation results demonstrate that the national dynamics have a unique equilibrium. Comparative statics analysis shows that, if environmental improvement occurs in the technologically advanced (less advanced) region, the national output rises (falls). As a region improves its technology, the other two regions' aggregated output levels fall—not only in relative, but also in absolute, terms. This implies that if any region has a high rate of technological change and the other regions remain technologically stationary, then economic activities will tend to be concentrated in the technologically advancing region. It is also shown that technological differences appear to play only a small role in accounting for spatial wage disparities and endowments.
AnderssonA EJohanssonBAndersonW P (Eds), 2003The Economics of Disappearing Distance (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
3.
AnderssonFForslidR, 2003, “Tax competition and economic geography”Journal of Public Economic Theory5279–303
4.
Ayong Le KamaA D, 2001, “Sustainable growth, renewable resources and pollution”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control251911–1918
5.
BaldwinR EKrugmanP, 2004, “Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonization”European Economic Review481–23
6.
BattenD F, 1982, “The interregional linkages between national and regional input–output models”International Regional Science Review753–67
7.
Bayindir-UpmannTZiadA, 2005, “Existence of equilibria in a basic tax competition model”Regional Science and Urban Economics351–22
8.
BlomquistG CBergerM CHoehnJ C, 1988, “New estimates of quality of life in urban areas”American Economic Review7889–107
9.
BoomsmaPOosterhavenJ, 1992, “A double-entry method for the construction of bi-regional input–output tables”Journal of Regional Science32269–284
10.
BorckRPflügerM, 2006, “Agglomeration and tax competition”European Economic Review50647–668
11.
BrecherR AChenZ QChoudriE U, 2002, “Absolute and comparative advantage, reconsidered: the pattern of international trade with optimal saving”Review of International Economics10645–656
CanningPWangZ, 2005, “A flexible mathematical programming model to estimate interregional input–output accounts”Journal of Regional Science45539–563
14.
CombesP GDuratonGGobillonL, 2003, “Spatial wage disparities: sorting matters!”, DP 4220, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London
15.
CropperM L, 1976, “Regulating activities with catastrophic environmental effects”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management31–15
16.
DeardorffA V, 1973, “The gains from trade in and out of steady state growth”Oxford Economic Papers25173–191
17.
DiamondD BTolleyG S (Eds), 1981The Economics of Urban Amenities (Academic Press, New York)
18.
DurantonGMonastiriotisV, 2002, “Mind the gaps: the evolution of regional earnings inequalities in the UK 1982–1997”Journal of Regional Science42219–256
19.
EatonJ, 1987, “A dynamic specific-factors model of international trade”Review of Economic Studies54325–338
20.
FindlayR, 1984, “Growth and development in trade models”, in Handbook of International Economics Eds JonesR WKenenR B (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 185–236
21.
ForsterB A, 1973, “Optimal consumption planning in a polluted environment”Economic Record49534–545
22.
FujitaM, 1989Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
23.
FujitaMThisseJ F, 2002Economics of Agglomeration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
GlaeserE LMaréD C, 2001, “Cities and skills”Journal of Labor Economics19316–342
26.
GruverG W, 1976, “Optimal investment in pollution control: capital in a neoclassical growth context”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management3165–177
27.
HewingsG J DJensenR C, 1986, “Regional, interregional and multiregional input–output analysis”, in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume I: Regional Economics Ed. NijkampP (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 295–355
28.
IanchovichinaEMcDougallR, 2001, “Theoretical structure of dynamic GTAP”, TP 17, GTAP Project, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University
29.
IsardW, 1953, “Some empirical results and problems of regional input–output analysis”, in Studies in the Structure of the American Economy Eds W Leontief and others (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 116–181
30.
KanemotoY, 1980Theories of Urban Externalities (North-Holland, Amsterdam)
31.
KennedyP W, 1994, “Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management2749–63
32.
KrugmanP, 1991Geography and Trade (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
33.
McDougallR, 2002, “A new regional household demand system for GTAP”, TP 20, GTAP Project, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University
34.
MälerK G, 2000, “Development, ecological resources and their management: a study of complex dynamic systems, Joseph Schumpeter lecture”European Economic Review44645–665
35.
OnikiHUzawaH, 1965, “Patterns of trade and investment in a dynamic model of international trade”Review of Economic Studies3215–38
36.
PlouderG C, 1972, “A model of waste accumulation and disposal”Canadian Journal of Economics5119–125
37.
RoyJ RJohanssonB, 1993, “A model of trade flows in differentiated goods”The Annals of Regional Science2795–115
38.
RuffinR J, 1979, “Growth and the log-run theory of international capital movements”American Economic Review69832–842
39.
SorgerG, 2002, “On the multi-region version of the Solow–Swan model”The Japanese Economic Review54146–164
40.
TakayamaTJudgeG G, 1971Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models (North-Holland, Amsterdam)
41.
WirlF, 2004, “Sustainable growth, renewable resources and pollution: thresholds and cycles”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control281149–1157
42.
ZhangW-B, 1998, “A two-region growth model—competition, references, resources, and amenities”Papers in Regional Science77173–188
43.
ZhangW-B, 2005Economic Growth Theory (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
