This paper offers a reflexive ethnography of a set of queer autonomous spaces created in London over the last five years. It traces the political genealogies of a recent strand of radical queer activism that is broadly aligned with the anarchist and anticapitalist wings of the global justice movement. In line with the usage of the term ‘queer’ by these activists themselves, to refer to a variety of states of being that challenge both homonormativity and heteronormativity, this paper utilises a definition of ‘queer’ that moves beyond the ways in which it has been mobilised by many sexual geographers. The ethnography poses questions about the ‘queer’ in ‘queer geography’ and what it means to be an ‘activist’. This work considers the importance (as well as the limits) of these autonomous queer spaces. It suggests that the process of collective experimentation to build autonomous queer spaces is ultimately more transformative and empowering than the resulting structures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Activist-Trauma Support, 2005, “Activist trauma: mutual support in the face of repression”, in Shut Them Down: The G8, Gleneagles 2005 and the Movement of Movements Eds HarvieDMilburnKTrottBWattsD (Dissent! And Autonomedia, Leeds) pp 257–261
2.
AminAThriftN, 2005, “What's Left? Just the future”Antipode37220–238
3.
BellDBinnieJ, 2000The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond (Polity Press, Cambridge)
4.
BrownG, 2006, “Cosmopolitan camouflage: (post-)gay space in Spitalfields, East London”, in Cosmopolitan Urbanism Eds BinnieJHollowayJMillingtonSYoungC (Routledge, London) pp 130–145
5.
ChattertonP, 2005, “Making autonomous geographies: Argentina's popular uprising and the ‘Movimiento de Trabajadores Desocupados’ (Unemployed Workers Movement)”Geoforum36545–561
6.
ChattertonPHollandsR, 2003Urban Nightscapes: Youth Cultures, Pleasure Spaces and Corporate Power (Routledge, London)
7.
DayR J F, 2004, “From hegemony to affinity: the political logic of the newest social movements”Cultural Studies18716–748
8.
Do or Die2003, “Down with empire! Up with spring!”101–101
9.
FreemanJ, 1972, “The tyranny of structurelessness”Berkeley Journal of Sociology17151–165
10.
HeckertJ, 2004, “Sexuality/identity/politics”, in Changing Anarchism: Anarchist Theory and Practice in a Global Age Eds PurkisJBowenJ (Manchester University Press, Manchester) pp 101–116
11.
HennenP, 2004, “Fae spirits and gender trouble”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33499–533
12.
HennessyR, 2000Profit and Pleasure: Sexual Identities in Late Capitalism (Routledge, London)
13.
HollowayJ, 2002, “Twelve theses on changing the world without taking power”The Commoner4 (May), http://www.commoner.org.uk
14.
IngramG BBouthilletteARetterY, 1997Queers in Space: Communities/Public Places/Sites of Resistance (Bay Press, Seattle, WA)
15.
KatzC, 1994, “Playing the field: questions of feminist fieldwork”The Professional Geographer4667–72
16.
KohlerBWissenM, 2003, “Globalizing protest: urban conflicts and global social movements”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27942–951
17.
LechatL, 2002Queeruption 4 (video), Cut & Paste Films, available from skeletondice@yahoo.co.uk
18.
LeesL, 2003, “The ambivalence of diversity and the politics of urban renaissance: the case of youth in Downtown Portland, Maine”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research27613–634
19.
LeesL, 2004, “The emancipatory city: urban (re)visions”, in The Emancipatory City: Paradoxes and Possibilities Ed. LeesL (Sage, London) pp 3–20
20.
McCormackD P, 2003, “An event of geographical ethics in spaces of affect”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series28488–507
21.
MayT, 1994The Political Philosophy of Post-structuralist Anarchism (Penn State University Press, University Park, PA)
News from Nowhere, 2003We are everywhere: The Irresistible Rise of Global Anti-capitalism (Verso, London)
24.
PinderD, 2004, “Inventing new games: unitary urbanism and the politics of space”, in The Emancipatory City: Paradoxes and Possibilities Ed. LeesL (Sage, London) pp 108–122
25.
Queeruption London, 2003QueerewindQueeruption Collective, London, copy available from Infoshop, 56a Crampton Street, London SE17 3AE
26.
RoutledgeP, 2003, “Convergence space: process geographies of grassroots globalization networks”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series28333–349
27.
RoutledgeP, 2005, “Grassrooting the imaginary: acting within the convergence”Ephemera5615–628
28.
SothernM, 2004, “(Un)Queer patriarchies: or, ‘What we think when we fuck’”Antipode36183–190
29.
de SouzaM L, 2000, “Urban development on the basis of autonomy: a politico-philosophical and ethical framework for urban planning and management”Ethics, Place and Environment3187–201
30.
Starhawk, 1982Dreaming the Dark: Magic, Sex and Politics (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
31.
ThriftN, 2000, “Entanglements of power: shadows?”, in Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance Eds SharpJ PRoutledgePPhiloCPaddisonR (Routledge, London) pp 262–278
32.
ThriftN, 2003, “Performance and …”Environment and Planning A352019–2024
33.
ThriftN, 2004, “Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect”Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography8657–78
34.
TormeyS, 2004Anti-capitalism: A Beginner's Guide (Oneworld, Oxford)
35.
TrottB, 2005, “Gleneagles, activism and ordinary rebelliousness”, in Shut Them Down: The G8, Gleneagles 2005 and the Movement of Movements Eds HarvieDMilburnKTrottBWattsD (Dissent! And Autonomedia, Leeds) pp 213–253
36.
WattsM, 2001, “1968 and all that …”Progress in Human Geography25157–188
37.
WrightS, 2000, “A love born of hate': autonomist rap in Italy”Theory, Culture and Society17(3) 117–135
