Relevance and Rigour: The Advantages of Reusing and Scaling up Qualitative Data

Baxter J Eyles J , 1997, “Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 22 505–525

Castree N , 2002, “Border geography” Area 34 103–112

Dorling D Shaw M , 2002, “Geographies of the agenda: Public policy, the discipline and its (re)‘turns’” Progress in Human Geography 26 629–646

James A Gray M Martin R Plummer P , “Commentary” Environment and Planning A 36 1901–1905

Martin R , 2001, “Geography and public policy: The case of the missing agenda” Progress in Human Geography 25 189–210

Noblit G Hare R , 1988 Metaethnography: Synthesising Qualitative Studies (Sage, Newbury Park, CA)

Peck J , 1999, “Grey geography” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 24 131–134

Spencer L Ritchie J Lewis J Dillon L , 2003 Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence Government Chief Social Researcher's Office (Cabinet Office, London)

Valentine G , 2005, “Joining up evidence on social exclusion: Re-using and scaling up qualitative data”, paper out to review, available from the author