This paper critically examines migration forecasts: numerical guesstimates of future patterns of migration flows. In the enlarging European Union, migration forecasts are often carried out upon requests from mass-migration-fearing policy makers. Most forecasts are based on key principles and working practices adhered to in neoclassical economics and spatial science—notably, equilibrium and place. Offering apparent numerical certainty, migration forecasts speak to a latent desire for aesthetic sociospatial order. Migration is considered a disequilibrium phenomenon, and linear movements and final destinations are presupposed. However, it is argued that these ‘orderly’ aesthetic assumptions do not correspond with ‘messy’ real East–West migration dynamics in the EU, which are foremost temporary and circulatory in nature. Drawing on evidence from the Netherlands, the paper concludes by suggesting that migration forecasts may indirectly strengthen claims for restrictive migration policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmariglioJ, 1990, “Economics as a postmodern discourse”, in Economics as Discourse: An Analysis of the Language of Economists Ed. SamuelsW (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA) pp 15–46
2.
BarnesTHannahM, 2001, “The place of numbers: histories, geographies, and theories of quantification”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19379–383
3.
BauerTZimmermannK, 1999Assessment of Possible Migration Pressure and its Labour Market Impact Following EU-enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe (Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn)
4.
BoeriTBrückerH, 2000The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on Employment and Labour Markets in the EU Member States (European Integration Consortium, Berlin)
5.
BrückerH, 2003Potential Migration from Central and Eastern Europe: An Update (European Integration Consortium, Berlin)
6.
BungeW, 1962Theoretical Geography (Gleerup, Lund)
7.
CallonM, 1998, “Introduction: the embeddedness of economic markets in economics”, in The Laws of the Markets Ed. CallonM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–57
8.
CresswellT, 1996In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology, and Transgression (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
9.
CresswellT, 2001, “The production of mobilities”New Formations4311–25
De MooijRRoodenburgHMorksD, 2004Arbeidsmigratie uit de Midden- en Oost-Europese Toetredingslanden (Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague)
12.
DoelM, 2001, “1a. Qualified quantitative geography”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19555–572
13.
FassmannHHintermannC, 1997Migrationspotential Ostmitteleuropa. Struktur und Motivation potentieller Migranten aus Polen, der Slowakei, Tschechien und Ungarn (Institut für Stadt- und Regionalforschung, Vienna)
14.
FassmannHMünzR, 2002EU-enlargement and Future East – West Migration in Europe: Migration Challenges in Central and Eastern Europe, 2002 Review (International Organisation for Migration, Geneva)
15.
GouldP, 1999Becoming a Geographer (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY)
16.
HaggettP, 1990The Geographer's Art (Blackwell, Oxford)
17.
HarrisJTodaroM, 1970, “Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis”The American Economic Review60126–142
18.
HendryD, 2002, “Forecast failure, expectations formation, and the Lucas critique”Annales d'Économie et de Statistique67–6821–40
19.
HilleHStraubhaarT, 2001Migration Policies and EU-Enlargement: The Case of Central and Eastern Europe (OECD, Paris)
20.
KrugmanP, 1995Development, Geography, and Economic Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
KunzJ, 2002, “Labour mobility and EU-enlargement: a review of current trends and debates”, discussion and working paper, European Trade Union Confederation, Brussels
22.
KupiszewskiM, 2002, “How trustworthy are forecasts of international migration between Poland and the European Union?”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies28627–645
23.
MarquesI d C, 2004, “Mathematical metaphors and politics of presence/absence”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2271–81
24.
OlssonG, 1980Birds in Egg/Eggs in Bird (Pion, London)
25.
PenroseR, 1974, “The role of aesthetic in pure and applied mathematical research”The Institute of Mathematics and its Applications7/81–13
26.
PijpersR, 2006, “‘Help! The Poles are coming’: narrating a contemporary moral panic”Geografiska Annaler B881–13
27.
RösslerM, 1989, “Applied geography and area research in Nazi society: central place theory and planning, 1933 to 1945”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7419–431
28.
SheppardE, 2001, “Quantitative geography; representations, practices, and possibilities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19535–554
29.
SibleyD, 1998a, “Sensations and spatial science: gratification and anxiety in the production of ordered landscapes”Environment and Planning A30235–246
30.
SibleyD, 1998b, “Problematizing exclusion: reflections on space, difference and knowledge”International Planning Studies393–100
31.
SinclairN, 2002, “The kissing triangles: the aesthetics of mathematical discovery”International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning745–63
32.
SinnH-WFlaigGWerdingMMunzSDüllNHofmannH, 2001EU-Erweiterung und Arbeitskräftemigration: Wege zu einer schrittweisen Annäherung der Arbeitsmärkte (Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, München)
33.
StraubhaarT, 2001, “Migration policies and EU-enlargement: east–west migration: will it be a problem?”Intereconomics July/August, 167–170
34.
TodaroM, 1997Economic Development (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
35.
van HoutumH, 2003, “Borders of comfort: ambivalences in spatial economic bordering processes in and by the European Union”Regional and Federal Studies1237–58
36.
van HoutumHvan der VeldeM, 2004, “The power of cross-border labour market immobility”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie95100–107
37.
WallaceC, 1999Migration Potential in Central and Eastern Europe (International Organisation for Migration, Geneva)
38.
WallaceC, 2002, “Opening and closing borders: migration and mobility in east–central Europe”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies28603–625
