In this paper we seek to present a challenge to the normative prescriptive role of strategic urban planning practice. In effect, we challenge what has traditionally been regarded as the essence of strategic or ‘forward’ planning: the plan as a statement of what the city ought to become. Using Lacanian-inspired analysis we seek to understand how urban issues may be identified as metaphorical deficiencies or illnesses, to which planners apply a therapeutic salve in the form of strategic policies. Turning to the psychological utopianism of Ernst Bloch, a Freudian-inspired predecessor of Lacan, we suggest a way forward in Bloch's immanent transcendent conceptualisation of hope. We suggest replacement of the transcendent term ‘utopian’ by ‘utopic’, as a practice which is critical, inclusive, and dynamic; performative rather than normative.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllmendingerPGunderM, 2005, “Applying Lacanian insight and a dash of Derridean deconstruction to planning's ‘dark side’”Planning Theory487–112
2.
AminAThriftN, 2002Cities: Reimagining the Urban (Polity, Cambridge)
3.
AmisM, 2002, “The books interview”The Observer 8 August, page 18
4.
AndersonB, 2002, “A principle of hope: recorded music, listening practices and the immanence of utopia”Geografiska Annaler84B211–227
5.
AndersonB, 2006, “‘Transcending without transcendence’: utopianism and a practice of hope”Antipode38691–710
6.
ARC, Auckland Regional Council, 21 Pitt Street, Private Bag 92-012, Auckland2003Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy 2003
7.
ARC, Auckland Regional Council, 21 Pitt Street, Private Bag 92-012, Auckland 2004, “Smart growth in smart living”Horizons17
ArnsteinS, 1969, “A ladder of citizen participation”Journal of the American Institute of Planners35216–224
10.
BaetenG, 2002a, “The spaces of utopia and dystopia”Geografiska Annaler special issue 84B3–4
11.
BaetenG, 2002b, “Hypochondriac geographies of the city and the new urban dystopia: coming to terms with the ‘other’ city”City6103–115
12.
BaumH, 1995, “Practising planning theory in a political world”, in Explorations in Planning Theory Eds MandelbaumSMazzaLBurchellR (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 365–382
13.
BaumanZ, 1976Socialism, the Active Utopia (HarperCollins, London)
14.
BaumanZ, 2003, “Utopia with no topos”History of the Human Sciences1611–25
15.
BlochE, 1986a [1955–59] The Principle of Hopethree volumes (Blackwell, Oxford)
16.
BlochE, 1986b [1961] Natural Law and Human Dignity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
17.
BlochE, 2000 [1923] The Spirit of Utopia (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
18.
BonzaniS, 2004, “Le projet local: du modele au scenario”Revue Urbanisme33667–68
19.
BourriaudN, 2002Relational Aesthetics (Les Presses du Réel, Paris)
20.
BoyerM, 1983Dreaming the Rational City (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
BridgeGWatsonS, 2000, “City interventions”, in A Companion to the City Eds BridgeGWatsonS, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 505–516
22.
BrutonM, 1974The Spirit and Purpose of Planning (Hutchinson, London)
23.
BurnyeatM, 1992, “Utopia and fantasy: the practicability of Plato's ideally just city”, in Psychoanalysis, Mind and Art Eds HopkinsJSavileA, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 175–187
24.
CampbellCFainsteinS, 2003, “The structure and debates of planning theory”, in Readings in Planning Theory2nd edition, Eds CampbellCFainsteinS (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–16
25.
CampbellHMarshallR, 1998, “Acting on principle: dilemmas in planning practice”Planning Practice and Research13117–128
26.
Committee for Melbourne, 1990Melbourne Docklands (Committee for Melbourne, Melbourne)
27.
CussenK, 2000, “‘Is’ or ‘ought’ in planning”Australian Planner37130–132
28.
de JouvenelH, 2004An Invitation to Foresight (Futuribles, Paris)
29.
DixonJDupuisA, 2003, “Urban intensification in Auckland, New Zealand: a challenge for new urbanism”Housing Studies18353–368
30.
Docklands Authority, 1993Docklands Plan (Victoria Government Publication, Melbourne)
31.
Docklands Authority, 1995Melbourne Docklands: Towards the 21st Century (Victoria Government Publication, Melbourne)
32.
DoveyK, 2005Fluid City (University of New South Wales Press, Sydney)
33.
DyckmanJ, 1964, “Summary: planning and metropolitan systems”, in Explorations into Urban Structure Eds WebberMDyckmanJFoleyDGuttenbergAWheatonWWursterC B (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA) pp 220–237
34.
FindlayAMorrisARogersonR, 1988, “Where to live in Britain, 1988”Cities August, 268–276
35.
FishmanR, 1977Urban Utopias in the 20th Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier (Basic Books, New York)
36.
FloridaR, 2000Competing in the Age of Talent: Environment, Amenities, and the New Economy (Mellon Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA)
37.
FloridaR, 2002The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it's Transforming Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life (Basic Books, New York)
ForrestD, 2000, “Theorising empowerment thought: illuminating the relationship between ideology and politics in the contemporary era”Sociological Research Online4(4), http://socresonline.org.uk/4/4/forresthtml.html
40.
FournierV, 2002, “Utopianism and the cultivation of possibilities: grassroots movements of hope”, in Utopia and Organisation Ed. ParkerM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 189–216
41.
FriedmannJ, 1987Planning in the Public Domain (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
42.
FriedmannJ, 2000, “The good city: in defence of utopian thinking”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24473–489
43.
FriedmannJ, 2002The Prospect of Cities (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
44.
GelkeH, 1988, “The wish and the phenomenology of the wish in ‘The Principle of Hope’”New German Critique4555–69
45.
GeogheganV, 2003, “Hope lost, hope regained”History of the Human Sciences16151–157
46.
GleesonBLowN, 2000Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas (Allen and Unwin, Sydney)
47.
GreyCGarstenC, 2002, “Organised and disorganised utopias: an essay on presumption”, in Utopia and Organisation Ed. ParkerM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 9–23
48.
GunderM, 2003a, “Passionate planning for the others' desire: an agonistic response to the dark side of planning”Progress in Planning60235–319
49.
GunderM, 2003b, “Planning policy formulation from a Lacanian perspective”International Planning Studies8279–294
50.
GunderM, 2004, “Shaping the planner's ego-ideal: a Lacanian interpretation of planning education”Journal of Planning Education and Research23299–311
51.
GunderM, 2005, “The production of desirous space: mere fantasies of the utopian city?”Planning Theory4173–199
52.
GunderMHillierJ, 2004, “Conforming to the expectations of the profession: a Lacanian perspective on planning practice, norms and values”Planning Theory and Practice5217–235
53.
HardyD, 2000Utopian England: Community Experiments 1900–1945 (Spon, London)
54.
HarveyD, 2000Spaces of Hope (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
HillierJ, 2002Shadows of Power (Routledge, London)
57.
HillierJ, 2003, “Agon'izing over consensus—why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘Real’”Planning Theory237–59
58.
HillierJGunderM, 2005, “Not over your dead bodies! A Lacanian interpretation of urban planning discourse and practice”Environment and Planning A31049–1066
59.
HoffmanSKrumholzNO'BrienK, 2000, “How capital budgeting helped a sick city: thirty years of capital improvement planning in Cleveland”Public Budgeting and Finance2024–37
60.
HudsonW, 1983The Marxist Philosophy of Ernst Bloch (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants)
61.
HuntT, 2004Building Jerusalem: The Rise and Fall of the Victorian City (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London)
62.
KatzP, 1994The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community (McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, CA)
63.
LaclauE, 1996Emancipation(s) (Verso, London)
64.
LaclauE, 2000, “Identity and hegemony”, in Contingency, Hegemony, Universality Eds ButlerJLaclauEŽižekS (Verso, London) pp 44–89
65.
LangH, 2003, “Language and ginitude”, in Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theoryvolume III, Ed. ŽižekS (Routledge, London) pp 221–265
66.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford)
67.
LefebvreH, 1996Writings on Cities (Blackwell, Oxford)
68.
LefebvreH, 2003The Urban Revolution (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
69.
LevitasR, 1990The Concept of Utopia (Phillip Allen, Deddington, Oxon)
70.
LevitasR, 2003a, “On dialectical utopianism”History of the Human Sciences16137–150
71.
LevitasR, 2003b, Introduction: the elusive idea of utopia”History of the Human Sciences161–10
72.
LynchK, 1981A Theory of Good City Form (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
73.
McCannE, 2004, “‘Best places’: interurban competition, quality of life and popular media discourse”Urban Studies411909–1929
ParkerM, 2002, “Utopia and the organisational imagination”, in Utopia and Organisation Ed. ParkerM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 1–8
84.
PeaseB, 2002, “Rethinking empowerment: a postmodern appraisal for emancipatory practice”British Journal of Social Work32135–147
85.
PietikainenP, 2004, “‘The sage knows you better than you know yourself’: psychological utopianism in Erich Fromm's work”History of Political Thought2586–115
86.
PinderD, 2002, “In defence of utopian urbanism: imagining cities after the ‘end of utopia’”Geografiska Annaler84B229–241
SandercockL, 2003Mongrel Cities: Cosmopolis II (Continuum, London)
96.
SandercockL, 2004, “Towards a planning imagination for the 21st century”Journal of the American Planning Association70133–141
97.
SargissonL, 2000Utopian Bodies and the Politics of Transgression (Routledge, London)
98.
SchaerRClaeysGSargentL, 2000Utopia: The Search for the Ideal Society in the Western World (Oxford University Press, New York)
99.
SchönDReinM, 1994Frame Reflection (Basic Books, New York)
100.
SimmelG, 2000, “The metropolis and mental Life”, in Readings in Social Theory: The Classic Tradition to Post-modernism Ed. FarganisJ (McGraw-Hill, New York) pp 149–157
101.
SnowM, 2004, “Towards an urban design agenda for Queensland”Australian Planner41(2) 22–24
102.
TalenE, 2002, “The social goals of new urbanism”Housing Policy Debate13165–188
103.
TaylorC, 2004Modern Social Imaginaries (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
104.
ThriftN, 2004, “Summoning life”, in Envisioning Human Geography Eds ClokePCrangMGoodwinM (Arnold, London) pp 81–103
105.
ThriftN, 2005, “But malice aforethought: cities and the natural history of hatred”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30133–150
