The paper examines Australian Indymedia collectives as a means to improve understanding of the practices of alter-globalisation movements. Two key issues are explored. The first concerns the politics of the alter-globalisation movements—what they demand and how they practise their aims. The second concerns the potential of information and communication technologies (ICTs) to provide a space within which to build a radical politics. Several dilemmas facing Indymedia and alter-globalisation movements emerge from this analysis. First, there remain many limitations of using ICTs as a space for the constitution of a radical politics. Second, Indymedia collectives have had success in aligning their aims to their practices; however, informal hierarchies did form around editorial decisions and technical skills. Third, there is continued potential for these movements to appear exclusive. In this respect, simply being ‘open’ is not enough to widen these spaces of resistance. Fourth, there is the continued importance of structure to strengthen the ability of groups to operate non-hierarchically Despite these dilemmas, many of the alter-globalisation movements' practices are proving workable. It is the ability of participants to acknowledge these dilemmas and to continue to be reflexive about their practices that is one of the greatest strengths of these emerging movements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ, 2004, “Spatial politics in practice: the style and substance of environmental direct action”Antipode36106–125
AttonC, 2003a, “Reshaping social movement media for a new millennium”Social Movement Studies23–15
9.
AttonC, 2003b, “Infoshops in the shadow of the state”, in Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World Eds CouldryNCurranJ (Rownman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD)
BeyH, 1991The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism (Autonomedia, New York)
12.
BlissetL, 2002, “Police minister fails to shut down anti-WTO websites”The Paper November, page 15
13.
BrandUWissenM, 2005, “Neoliberal globalisation and the internationalization of protest: a European perspective”Antipode379–18
14.
BrianS, 2001, “Reporting from the frontline”On Fire: The Battle of Genoa and the Anti-capitalist Movement (One Off Press, London)
15.
BrownM P, 1992, “The possibility of local autonomy”Urban Geography13257–279
16.
ButlerC TRothsteinA, 1988On Conflict and Consensus: A Handbook on Formal Consensus Decisionmaking (Food Not Bombs Publishing, Takoma Park, MD), http://www.consensus.net/
17.
CallinicosA, 2003An Anti-capitalist Manifesto (Polity Press, Cambridge)
18.
CastellsM, 1996The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Oxford)
19.
CastellsM, 2001The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
20.
ChestersGWelshI, 2001, “Re-framing social movements: margins, meanings and governance”, WP 19, Department of Social Sciences, Cardiff University
ClarkG L, 1984, “A theory of local autonomy”Annals of the Association of American Geographers74195–208
23.
ClokeP, 2002, “Deliver us from evil? Prospects for living ethically and acting politically in human geography”Progress in Human Geography26587–604
24.
CockburnASt ClairJSekulaA, 2000Five Days That Shook the World: The Battle for Seattle and Beyond (Verso, London)
25.
DeFilippisJ, 2004Unmaking Goliath: Community Control in the Face of Capital Mobility (Routledge, London)
26.
DowningJ, 2003a, “Audience and readers of alternative media: the absent lure of the virtually unknown”Media, Culture and Society25625–645
27.
DowningJ, 2003b, “The IMC movement beyond, ‘the West’”, in Representing Resistance: Media, Civil Disobedience and the Anti-globalisation Movement Eds OpelAPompperD (Greenwood, Westport, CT) pp 241–258
28.
FeatherstoneD, 2003, “Spatialities of transnational resistance to globalization: the maps of grievance of the Inter-Continental Caravan”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series28404–421
29.
FeatherstoneD, 2005, “Towards the relational construction of militant particularisms: or why the geographies of past struggles matter for resistance to neoliberal globalisation”Antipode32250–271
30.
FroehlingO, 1999, “Interauts and guerrilleros: the Zapatista rebellion in Chiapas, Mexico and its extension into cyberspace”, in Virtual Geographies: Bodies, Space and Relations Eds CrangMCrangPMayJ (Routledge, London) pp 205–221
31.
FullerD, 1999, “Part of the action, or ‘going native?’ Learning to cope with the ‘politics of integration’”Area31221–227
32.
GrahamS, 2004, “Introduction: from dreams of transcendence to the remediation of urban life” in The Cybercities Reader Ed. GrahamS (Routledge, London) pp 1–30
33.
HalleckD, 2004, “Indymedia: building an international activist internet network”, in The IMC—A New Model: Don't Hate the Media, Be the Media Ed. Indymedia (Hedonist Press, Walcot, Somerset) pp 116–121
34.
HermanE SChomskyN, 1995Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (Vintage Books, New York)
JankowskiN WJansenM, 2003, “Indymedia: exploration of an alternative internet-based source of movement news”, presented at Digital News, Social Change and Globalisation Conference, Hong Kong, 11–12 December, http://baserv.uci.kun.nl/∼jankow/Jankowski/
37.
JordanT, 2002Activism! Direct Action, Hacktivism and the Future of Society (Reaktion Books, London)
38.
KahnRKellnerD, 2005, “Oppositional politics and the Internet: a critical/reconstructive approach”Cultural Politics175–100
39.
KiddD, 2003a, “Indymedia.org: a new communications commons”, in Cyberactivism: On-line Activism in Theory and Practice Eds McCaugheyMAyersM (Routledge, London) pp 41–70
40.
KiddD, 2003b, “Become the media: the global IMC network”, in Representing Resistance: Media, Civil Disobedience and the Anti-globalisation Movement (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT) pp 223–240
41.
KiddD, 2004, “The independent media center: a new model”, in The IMC—A New Model: Don't Hate the Media, Be the Media Ed. Indymedia (Hedonist Press, Walcot, Somerset) pp 9–14
42.
KingsnorthP, 2004One No, Many Yeses: A Journey to the Heart of the Global Resistance Movement (Free Press, New York)
43.
LangloisA, 2004, “The praxis of open publishing: uniting philosophy with policy and practice”Journal for the Arts, Sciences and Technology2(1) 63–73
44.
LovinkGSchneiderF, 2002, “New rules, new actonomy”, in Sarai Reader 2: The Cities of Everyday Life Eds VasudevanRSundaramRBagchiJNarnlaMLouinkGSenguptaS (Sarai, Delhi) pp 314–319
45.
McKayG, 1998DIY Culture Party and Protest in Nineties' Britain (Verso, London)
46.
MamadouhV, 2004, “Internet, scale and the global grassroots: geographies of the Indymedia network of independent media centres”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie95482–497
MoodyG, 2002Rebel Code: Linux and the Open Source Revolution (Penguin Books, London)
49.
NogueiraA, 2002, “The birth and promise of the Indymedia revolution”, in From ACT UP to the WT: Urban Protest and Community Building in the Era of Globalization Eds ShepardBHaydukR (Verso, London) pp 290–297
50.
Notes From Nowhere (Eds), 2003We Are Everywhere, the Irresistible Rise of Anti Capitalism (Verso, London)
51.
PainR, 2003, “Social geography; on action-oriented research”Progress in Human Geography27649–657
52.
PickerillJ, 2003Cyberprotest: Environmental Activism On-line (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
53.
PickerillJ, 2004, “Rethinking political participation: experiments in internet activism in Australia and Britain”, in Electronic Democracy: Mobilisation, Organisation and Participation via new ICTs Eds GibsonRRoemmeleAWardS (Routledge, London) pp 170–193
PickerillJChattertonP, 2006, “Notes towards autonomous geographies: creation, resistance and self-management as survival tactics”Progress in Human Geography30(6) 1–17
56.
RheingoldH, 1994The Virtual Community: Surfing the Internet (Minerva, London)
57.
RoutledgeP, 2003, “Convergence space: process geographies of grassroots globalization networks”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series28333–349
58.
SchalitJ (Ed.), 2002The Anti-capitalism Reader: Anti-market Politics in Theory and Practice, Past, Present and Future (Akashic Books, New York)
59.
SeelB, 1997, “‘If not you, then who?’ Earth First! in the UK”Environmental Politics6(3) 172–179
60.
SimpsonS, 2004, “Explaining the commercialization of the internet: a neo-Gramscian contribution”Information, Communication and Society750–68
61.
SmithJ, 2001, “Cyber subversion in the information economy”Dissent48(2) 48–52
62.
StarrAAdamsJ, 2003, “Anti-globalization: the global fight for local autonomy”New Political Science2519–42
63.
VaneigemR, 1979Revolution of Everyday Life (Rising Free Collective, London)
64.
WolmanHGoldsmithM, 1990, “Local autonomy as a meaningful analytic concept”Urban Affairs Quarterly263–27
