For some geographers, the world has become imaginatively alive with arrays of new nonhumans. Yet how well these vocabularies actually adhere to personal practice is something which could be better explored. Recent accounts of consumption, meanwhile, are committed to closely observed contextual experience. Yet, physical things can seem somewhat subdued in these accounts. With these ideas in mind, in this paper I align a geographical embrace of material vitality and an in-depth approach to practised consumption. I report on a period of ethnographic work with seven garden centres in London to reconsider the ways in which contemporary urbanites encounter the items on sale there. In the London garden centre there are some different ways of approaching life and some changing cultures of control, as the rumbling agencies that certain products purvey are both openly enjoyed and nervously negated. Exploring the unease associated with this situation and its impact upon personal behaviour and physical format, I reflect, in particular, on the current experience of plants. The conclusion that follows is potentially perverse as, although we can benefit from being with life, it seems that, in certain city spaces at least, we now deal better with that which is more dead.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaradK, 1998, “Getting real: technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality”Differences1087–128
BerlinBKayP, 1969Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
5.
BoltonL, 2001, “Classifying the material: food, textiles and status in north Vanuatu”Journal of Material Culture6251–268
6.
BurgessJ, 1995, “Growing in confidence: a study of perceptions of risk in urban fringe woodlands”, Technical Report CCP 457, Countryside Commission, John Dover House, Crescent Place, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire GL50 3RH
7.
CastreeN, 2003a, “Environmental issues: relational ontologies and hybrid politics”Progress in Human Geography27203–211
8.
CastreeN, 2003b, “Commodifying what nature”Progress in Human Geography27273–297
9.
ChurchA, 2001, “Nature, leisure, retailing and the home”, paper presented to the Institute of British Geographers Conference, Portsmouth, UK, copy available from A Church, School of Environment, University of Brighton, Brighton
10.
Colloredo-MansfieldR, 2003, “Matter unbound”Journal of Material Culture8245–254
11.
CookI, 1994, “New fruits and vanity: symbolic production in the global food economy”, in From Columbus to Con Agra: The Globalisation of Agriculture and Food Order Eds BonannoABuschLFriedlandWLourdesGMingioneE (Kansas University Press, Lawrence, KS) pp 103–106
12.
CreweL, 2000, “Geographies of retailing and consumption”Progress in Human Geography24275–290
13.
CussinsC, 1998, “Ontological choreography: agency for women patients in an infertility clinic”, in Differences in Medicine: Unravelling Practices, Techniques and Bodies Eds BergMMolA (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 166–201
14.
DaviesG, 2000, “Narrating the natural history unit: institutional orderings and spatial strategies”, Geoforum31539–551
15.
DescolaP, 1994In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
16.
DickensP, 1996Reconstructing Nature: Alienation, Emancipation and the Division of Labour (Routledge, London)
17.
GuthrieS, 1993Faces in the Clouds (Oxford University Press, New York)
18.
HinchliffeS, 2001, “Indeterminacy in-decisions—science policy and politics in the BSE crisis”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series26182–204
19.
HinchliffeSDegenMKearnesMWhatmoreS, 2003Living Cities: A New Agenda for Urban Natures research report available from S Hinchliffe, Geography Discipline, The Open University, Milton Keynes, http://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/habitable_cities
20.
HitchingsR, 2004, “At home with someone nonhuman”Home Cultures1169–186
21.
HitchingsRJonesV, 2004, “Living with plants and the exploration of botanical encounter within human geographic research practice”Ethics, Place and Environment73–18
22.
IngoldT, 2000The Perception of the Environment (Routledge, London)
23.
JacksonP, 2004, “Local consumption cultures in a globalizing world”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series29165–178
24.
JacksonPThriftN, 1995, “Geographies of consumption”, in Acknowledging Consumption Ed. MillerD (Routledge, London) pp 204–238
25.
JonesOClokeP, 2002Tree Cultures: The Place of Trees and Trees in their Place (Berg, Oxford)
26.
KaplanR, 2001, “The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits”Environment and Behaviour33507–542
KongLYuenBSodhiNBriffettC, 1999, “The construction and experience of nature: perspectives of urban youths”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie903–16
30.
KopytoffI, 1986, “The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process”, in The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective Ed. AppaduraiA (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 64–91
31.
KriegerM, 1973, “What's wrong with plastic trees?”Science179446–454
32.
LatourB, 2000, “When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences”British Journal of Sociology51107–123
33.
LatourB, 2004Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
MansfieldB, 2003, “‘Imitation crab’ and the material culture of commodity production”Cultural Geographies10176–195
42.
MarcusG, 1995, “Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography”Annual Review of Anthropology2495–117
43.
MillerD, 1997Capitalism: An Ethnographic Approach (Berg, Oxford)
44.
MillerD, 1998, “Why some things matter”, in Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter Ed. MillerD (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 3–21
45.
MillerD, 2001, “Possessions”, in Home Possessions: Material Culture and the Home Ed. MillerD (Berg, Oxford) pp 107–122
46.
Mintel, 1999, Home and Garden Monthly Digest Series, 111, May
47.
Mintel, 2001, “Garden products retailing”, Mintel International Group Ltd, 18–19 Long Lane, London EC1A 9PL
48.
PadenR, 1994, “Against grand theory in environmental ethics”Environmental Values361–70
49.
RobinsonC, 2002, “Speaking across time and cultures in bioethics and environmental ethics”Ethics, Place and Environment5271–280
50.
RoseD, 1995, “Active ingredients”, in Contemporary Marketing and Consumer Behaviour: An Anthropological Sourcebook Ed. SherryJ (Sage, London) pp 51–85
51.
RussellH, 1995Research Methods in Anthropology (AltaMira, Walnut Creek, CA)
52.
SadallaESheetsV, 1993, “Symbolism in building materials: self-presentation and cognitive components”Environment and Behaviour25155–180
53.
SchneeklothL, 1989. “‘Where did you go, what did you see?’ ‘Nothing’”Children's Environments Quarterly614–17
54.
SheetsVManzerC, 1991, “Affect, cognition and urban vegetation: some effects of adding trees along city streets”Environment and Behaviour23285–304
55.
ShoveE, 2003Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organisation of Normality (Berg, Oxford)
56.
SlaterDTonkissF, 2001Market Society (Polity Press, Cambridge)
57.
SpencerTWhatmoreS, 2001, “Bio-geographies: putting life back into the discipline”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series26139–141
58.
ThriftN, 2003, “Closer to the machine? Intelligent environments, new forms of possession and the rise of the supertoy”Cultural Geographies10389–407
59.
ThriftN, 2004, “Summoning life”, in Envisioning Human Geography Eds ClokePCrangPGoodwinM (Arnold, London) pp 81–103
60.
UlrichR, 1984, “View through a window may influence recovery from surgery”Science224420–421
61.
VidalJ, 1999, “This green and instant land”The Guardian 22 May
62.
WhatmoreS, 1999, “Hybrid geographies: rethinking the ‘human’ in human geography”, in Human Geography Today Ed. MasseyDAllenJSarreP (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 24–39
