This paper explores the potential for environmental information to play an instrumental rational role in planning through an empirical investigation of regional planning processes in the German federal state of Brandenburg. The findings show that environmental information is used in only a limited number of policy issues and processes and that where it plays a role in choice making, its function is procedural rather than instrumental. The author concludes that the influence of the regulatory framework on the decisionmaking jurisdiction of regional planning and the disappearance of environmental information in decisions of great economic importance are key constraints on a rational instrumental role for environmental information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirkmanJ, 2003, “Vom Monitoring zum Controlling: Weiterentwicklung von Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren für die Regionalplanung am Beispiel eines Monitoring- und Controllingsystems ‘Gewerbeflächen’—Fallbeispiel Ostthüringen” [From monitoring to controlling: Refinement of sustainability indicators for regional planning based on a monitoring and controlling system for business areas—the case study of east Thuringia]Raumordnung und Raumforschung61357–370
2.
Brandenburger Landesregierung, 1999, “Vereinbarung zur Zusammenarbeit in einer Regierungskoalition für die 3. Wahlperiode des Brandenburger Landtages 1999 bis 2004” [Government coalition cooperation agreement for the third term of the Brandenburg Parliament 1999–2004], http://www.mlur.brandenburg.de/cms/detail.php?id=121972&_siteid=30
3.
CampbellH, 1990The Use of Geographical Information in Local Authority Planning Departments PhD thesis, Department of Town and Regional Planning, Sheffield University, Sheffield
4.
CaplanNMorrisonAStambaughR, 1975The Use of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Decisions at the National Level (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI)
5.
CounsellD, 1998, “Sustainable development and structure plans in England and Wales: A review of current practice”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management41(2) 177–194
6.
FeldmanM SMarchJ G, 1981, “Information in organisations as sign and symbol”Administrative Science Quarterly26171–186
7.
FischerT, 1999Strategic Environmental Assessment for Transport Infrastructure Related Policies, Plans and Programmes: A Comparative Analysis of North West England, Noord-Holland and Brandenburg-Berlin PhD thesis, Faculty of the Arts, University of Manchester, Manchester
8.
FlyvbjergB, 1998Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
9.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
10.
ForesterJ, 1993Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
11.
Gemeinsame Landesplanung Berlin-Brandenburg, 1998Raumordnungsbericht1998 [Spatial Planning Report 1998] Gemeinsame Landesplanungsabteilung der Länder Berlin und Brandenburg GL1, Potsdam
12.
GrühnDKennewegH, 1998Berücksichtigung der Belange von Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in der Flächennutzungsplanung [Consideration of nature and landscape protection interests in preparatory land-use planning] (BfN-Schriftenvertrieb im Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster)
13.
HabermasJ, 1984Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society (Polity Press, London)
14.
HawkenPLovinsALovinsH, 1999Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution (Earthscan, London)
15.
HillsS, 2003The Role of Environmental Information in Spatial Planning: A Case Study of Regional Planning in Brandenburg, Germany unpublished PhD thesis, Faculty of the Built Environment, The University of the West of England, Bristol
16.
InnesJ, 1988, “Effects of data requirements on planning: Case studies of environmental impact assessment and community development block grants”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems1277–88
17.
InnesJ, 1990Knowledge and Public Policy: The Search for Meaningful Indicators (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ)
18.
InnesJ, 1998, “Information in communicative planning”Journal of the American Planning Association6452–63
19.
JonesCWoodCDipperB, 1998, “Environmental assessment in the UK planning process: A review of practice”Town Planning Review69315–339
20.
JordonR, 2000, “Ist die Flächennutzungsplanung wirklich so schlecht?” [Is prepatory land-use planning really so bad?]Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung32(8) 236–241
21.
LindblomC ECohenD K, 1979Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
22.
LukesS, 1974Power: A Radical View (Macmillan, London)
23.
MarchJ QSimonH A, 1959Organisations (John Wiley, New York)
24.
Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umweltschutz und Raumordnung des Landes Brandenburg, 1999, “Grundsätze Brandenburger Umwelt und Raumordnungspolitik” [The principles of Brandenburg's environmental and spatial planning policy]; copy available from author
25.
NelkinD, 1979Controversy: The Politics of Technical Decisions (Sage, Beverley Hills, CA)
26.
PotschinMThaterM, 2003, “Zunehmender Landschaftsverbrauch in Deutschland: Eine Betrachtung am Beispiel der Golfplatzentwicklung im Landkreis Lörrach” [The increasing development of landscape areas in Germany]Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung35(7) 197–211
27.
ReinH, 2000Ansatzpunkte zur Effektivierung der Landschaftsplanung am Beispiel der Landschaftsrahmenplanung Brandenburg [Starting points for increasing the effectiveness of landscape planning based on the example of landscape framework planning in Brandenburg] (Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung, Berlin)
28.
StephensonR, 1999Information Systems and Policy Processes in Planning unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Town and Regional Planning, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford
29.
UNCED, 1992Agenda 21 and the UNCED Proceedings 4 Ed. RobinsonN, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Oceana Publications, New York)
30.
WeissC, 1979, “The many meanings of research utilization”Public Administration Review39426–431
31.
WeissC HBucuvalasM J, 1977, “The challenge of social research to decision making”, in Using Social Research in Public Policy Making Ed. WeissC H (Lexington Books, Lanham, MD) pp 213–233
