Our objective in this paper is to analyse empirically the effects of environmental quality on residential location choices in two Belgian cities, using a detailed description of the urban environment derived from remotely sensed data and using GIS tools. According to urban models which include amenities, environmental quality may influence land rents and location by income in the city. In order to test these relations, average land rents and mean income per district are regressed on distance to the centre and several environmental characteristics, using the instrumental variables method in order to take account of endogeneity. Fourteen environmental variables, representing socioeconomic facilities and natural attributes are obtained from aerial photographs, satellite images, and ancillary data. Their spatial representations are constructed using GIS functions. The empirical results confirm the impact of greenery on location choice and the existence of a higher environmental quality at the periphery than near the centre of the two cities. They also reveal that the impact of environmental quality components on residential location depends on the shape and history of the cities and on the relative scarcity of the environmental attributes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnasAArnottR JSmallK A, 1998, “Urban spatial structure”Journal of Economic Literature361426–1464.
2.
BartikT JButlerJ SLiuJ T, 1992, “Maximum score estimates of the determinants of residential mobility: Implications for the value of residential attachment and neighbourhood amenities”Journal of Urban Economics32233–256.
3.
BastianC TMcLeodD MGerminoM JReinersW ABlaskoB J, 2002, “Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: A Hedonic model using geographic information systems data”Ecological Economics40337–349.
4.
BaumC FSchafferM EStillmanS, 2003, “Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing”Stata Journal31–31.
5.
BensonE D, 1998, “Pricing residential amenities: The value of the view”Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics1655–73.
6.
BlackS E, 1999, “Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education”Quarterly Journal of Economics114577–599.
BruecknerJ KThisseJ-FZenouY, 1999, “Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory”European Economic Review4391–107.
9.
CheshirePSheppardS, 1995, “On the price of land and the value of amenities”Economica62247–267.
10.
ChoC J, 2001, “Amenities and urban residential structure: An amenity-embedded model of residential choice”Papers in Regional Science80483–498.
11.
ColwellP FMunnekeH J, 1997, “The structure of urban land prices”Journal of Urban Economics41321–336.
12.
ComblinD, 1994, “Electromagnétisme et santé, les risques sanitaires engendréspar les lignes à haute tension et les utilisations de l‘électricité” [Electromagnetism and health, sanitary risks induced by high-voltage lines and electricity use], dossier 2, Centre d'Etude et de Formation en Ecologie, Namur.
13.
CraneRDaniereA, 1996, “Measuring access to basic services in global cities: Descriptive and behavioural approaches”Journal of the American Planning Association62203–221.
14.
CraneRDaniereAHarwoodS, 1997, “The contribution of environmental amenities to low-income housing: A Comparative study of Bangkok and Jakarta”Urban Studies341495–1512.
15.
CremerH, 1990, “Residential choice and the supply of local public goods”Journal of Urban Economics27168–187.
16.
CropperM LLelandB DMcConnellK E, 1988, “On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions”Review of Economics and Statistics70668–675.
17.
DavidsonRMcKinnonJ G, 1989, “Testing for consistency using artificial regressions”Econometric Theory5363–384.
18.
DiamondD B, 1980, “Income and residential location: Muth revisited”Urban Studies171–12.
19.
FarberS, 1998, “Undesirable facilities and property values: A Summary of empirical studies”Ecological Economics241–14.
20.
ForsterB C, 1985, “An examination of some problems and solutions in monitoring urban areas from satellite platforms”International Journal of Remote Sensing11225–235.
21.
FujitaM, 1989Urban Economic Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
22.
GerminoM JReinersW ABlaskoB JMcLeodDBastianC T, 2001, “Estimating visual properties of Rocky Mountain landscapes using GIS”Landscape and Urban Planning5371–83.
23.
GlaeserE LKahnM E, 2004, “Sprawl and urban growth”, in Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics volume 4, Eds HendersonVThisseJ F (North-Holland, Amsterdam) forthcoming.
GyourkoJKahnM ETracyJ, 1999, “Quality of life and environmental comparisons”, in Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics volume 3, Eds MillsE SCheshireP (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 1413–1454.
26.
HarrisPVenturaS, 1995, “The integration of geographic data with remotely-sensed imagery to improve classification in an urban area”Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing61993–998.
27.
HornR, 1993Statistical Indicators for the Economic and Social Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
28.
IrwinE G, 2002, “The effects of open space on residential property values”Land Economics78465–481.
29.
IrwinE GBockstaelN E, 2001, “The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential property values”American Journal of Agricultural Economics83698–704.
30.
IstazDPouleurJVerdoodtJ-C, 1988, “Itinéraire d'une grande cité industrielle” [Description of a large industrial city]Hommes et Paysages61–48.
31.
KetkarK, 1992, “Hazardous waste sites and property values in the state of New Jersey”Applied Economics18170–184.
32.
LovettABatemanI, 2001, “Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems25131–139.
33.
LuttikJ, 2000, “The value of trees, water, and open space as reflected by the house prices in the Netherlands”Landscape and Urban Planning48161–167.
34.
McMillenD P, 2003, “The return of centralization to Chicago: Using repeat sales to identify changes in house price distance gradients”Regional Science and Urban Economics33287–304.
35.
MoranchoA B, 2003, “A hedonic valuation of urban green areas”Landscape and Urban Planning6635–41.
36.
MosmansADumontDDelpiere-DramaisCh, 1994, “Estimation du coût de la pollution acoustique occasionnée par les transports [Estimation of the cost of traffic-related acoustic pollution], Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut de sociologie, Groupe d'Economie des Transports, Bruxelles.
37.
MuthR, 1969Cities and Housing (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
38.
NelsonJ P, 1979, “Residential choice, hedonic prices and the demand of urban air quality”Journal of Urban Economics5357–369.
39.
NelsonJ P, 1980, “Airports and property values”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy1437–52.
40.
OrlandBViningJEbreoA, 1992, “The effects of trees on perceived values of residential property”Environment and Behaviour24298–325.
41.
PalmquistR B, 1992, “Valuing localized externalities”Journal of Urban Economics3159–68.
42.
PapageorgiouY, 1973, “The impact of the environment upon the distribution of population and land values”Economic Geography49251–256.
43.
PatersonR WBoyleK J, 2002, “Out of sight, out of mind? Using GIS to incorporate visibility in hedonic property value models”Land Economies78417–425.
44.
PittDSoergelKZubeE, 1981, “Trees in the city”, in Nature in Cities: The Natural Environment in the Design and Development of Urban Green Space Ed. LaurieI C (John Wiley, New York) pp 205–230.
45.
RichardsonH W, 1977, “On the possibility of positive rent gradients”Journal of Urban Economics460–68.
46.
RiciP FPerronL EEmmettB A, 1977, “Environmental quality, expenditure patterns, and urban location: Effects on income groups”Socio-Economic Planning Science11249–258.
47.
RogersonsR JFindlayA MMorrisA SCoombesM G, 1989, “Indicators of quality of life: Some methodological issues”Environment and Planning A211655–1666.
48.
RosenS, 1974, “Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition”Journal of Political Economy8834–55.
49.
SheppardS, 1999, “Hedonic analysis of housing markets”, in Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics volume 3, Eds MillsE SCheshireP (North-Holland, Amsterdam) pp 1595–1635.
50.
SmithB H, 1993, “The effect of ocean and lake coast amenities in cities”Journal of Urban Economics33115–123.
51.
SöderbergBJanssenC, 2001, “Estimating distance gradients for apartment properties”Urban Studies3861–79.
52.
SoguelN, 1994Evaluation Monétaire des Atteintes à l'Environnement [Monetary valuation of environmental damage], unpublished PhD thesis, IRER, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
53.
StockJ HYogoM, 2002, “Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression”, WP 0284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
54.
TyrväinenLMiettinenA, 2000, “Properties prices and urban forest amenities”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management39205–223.
55.
WooldridgeJ M, 2002Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
56.
WuJPlantingaA J, 2003, “The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management46288–309.
