In this paper I explore the potential of using geographical information systems (GIS) in qualitative research by disentangling the seemingly rigid association of the field of geographic information science with quantitative geography. I examine the opposition between quantitative and qualitative methods as an extension of different epistemologies and not as indicative of their innate incompatibility, and reposition GIS within these methods seen as a continuum. I show that the always-assumed alignment of GIS with quantitative research has never been complete and the many openings in GIS enable qualitative research. I also discuss how critical geographers can engage with and transform GIS as well as enhance their explanations and social theory in general by representing spatially complex social processes and relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminAThriftN, 2000, “What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography?”Antipode324–9
2.
BabbieER, 2000The Practice of Social Research9th edition (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA)
3.
BarnesTJ, 1994; “Probable writing: Derrida, deconstruction, and the quantitative revolution in human geography”Environment and Planning A261021–1040
4.
BarnesTJ, 1996Logics of Dislocation: Models, Metaphors, and Meanings of Economic Space (Guilford Press, New York)
5.
BarnesTJ, 1998, “A history of regression: Actors, networks, machines, and numbers”Environment and Planning A30203–223
6.
BarnesTJ, 2000a, “Quantitative methods”, in The Dictionary of Human Geography Eds JohnstonRJGregoryDPrattGWattsM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 663–664
7.
BarnesTJ, 2000b, “Inventing Anglo-American economic geography, 1889–1960”, in A Companion to Economic Geography Eds SheppardESBarnesTJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 11–26
8.
BarnesTJ, 2001a, “Lives lived and lives told: Biographies of geography's quantitative revolution”Environment and Planning D: Society and space19409–429
9.
BarnesTJ, 2001b, “Retheorizing economic geography: From the quantitative revolution to the ‘cultural turn’”Annals of the Association of American Geographers91546–565
10.
BarnesTJ, 2003, “The place of locational analysis: A selective and interpretive history”Progress in Human Geography2769–95
11.
BarnesTJHannahMG, 2001, “The place of numbers: Histories, geographies, and theories of quantification”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19379–383
12.
BellSReedM, 2004, “Adapting to the machine: Integrating GIS into qualitative research”Cartographica39 (1) 55–66
13.
CadwalladerM, 1996Urban Geography: An Analytical Approach (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ)
14.
CieriM, 2003, “Between being and looking: Queer tourism promotion and lesbian social space in Greater Philadelphia”ACME: An International E-journal for Critical Geographies2 (2) 147–166
15.
ClarkMJ, 1998, “GIS—democracy or delusion?”Environment and Planning A30303–316
16.
ClarkeKC, 1999Getting Started with Geographic Information Systems2nd edition (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ)
17.
CliffordNJValentineG (Eds), 2003Key Methods in Geography (Sage, London)
18.
ClokePPhiloCSadlerD, 1991Approaching Human Geography: An Introduction to Contemporary Theoretical Debates (Guilford Press, New York)
19.
CopeM, 1998, “Home–work links, labor markets, and the construction of place in Lawrence, Massachusetts, 1920–1939”The Professional Geographer50126–140
20.
CraigWJHarrisTMWeinerD (Eds), 2002Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (Taylor and Francis, London)
21.
CramptonJW, 2001, “Maps as social constructions: Power, communication, and visualization”Progress in Human Geography25235–252
22.
CramptonJW, 2003, “Cartographic rationality and the politics of geosurveillance and security”Cartography and Geographic Information Science30135–148
23.
CrangM, 2002, “Qualitative methods: The new orthodoxy? Progress report”Progress in Human Geography26647–655
CurryMR, 1997, “The digital individual and the private realm”Annals of the Association of American Geographers87681–699
26.
DixonDPJonesJPIII, 1996, “For a supercalifragilisticexpialidocious scientific geography”Annals of the Association of American Geographers86767–779
27.
DixonDPJonesJPIII, 2004, “What next?”Environment and Planning A36381–390
28.
DoelMA, 2001, “1a. Qualified quantitative geography”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19555–572
29.
DorlingD, 1998, “Human cartography: When it is good to map”Environment and Planning A30277–288
30.
EastmanJR, 2003IDRISI Kilimanjaro Guide to GIS and Image Processing (Clark University, Worcester, MA)
31.
EdneyM, 1997Mapping the Empire: The Geographical Construction of British India (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
32.
ElwoodSALeitnerH, 1998, “GIS and community based planning: Exploring the diversity of neighborhood perspectives and needs”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems2577–88
33.
FlowerdewR, 1998, “Reacting to Ground Truth”, Environment and Planning A30289–301
34.
FotheringhamAS, 1997, “Trends in quantitative methods 1: Stressing the local”Progress in Human Geography2188–96
35.
GetisAOrdJK, 1996, “Local spatial statistics: An overview”, in Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment Eds LongleyPBattyM (Geoinformation International, Cambridge) pp 261–277
36.
Gibson-GrahamJ-K, 1996The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy (Blackwell, Oxford)
37.
Gibson-GrahamJ-K, 2000, “Poststructuralist interventions”, in A Companion to Economic Geography Eds SheppardESBarnesTJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 95–110
38.
GodlewskaASmithN (Eds), 1994Geography and Empire (Blackwell, Malden, MA)
39.
GossJ, 1995, “Marketing the new marketing: The strategic discourse of geodemographic information systems”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ (Guilford Press, New York) pp 130–170
40.
GravesSM, 2003, “Landscapes of predation, landscapes of neglect: A locational analysis of payday lenders and banks”The Professional Geographer55303–317
41.
HansonS, 1997, “As the world turns: New horizons in feminist geographic methodologies”, in Thresholds in Feminist Geography: Difference, Methodology, Representation Eds JonesJPIIINastHJRobertsSM (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD) pp 119–128
42.
HansonS, 2002, “Connections”Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography9301–303
43.
HansonSPrattG, 1995Gender, Work, and Space (Routledge, New York)
44.
HansonSKominiakTCarlinS, 1997, “Assessing the impact of location on women's labor market outcome: A methodological exploration”Geographical Analysis29282–297
45.
HarleyJB, 1992, “Deconstructing the map”, in Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text, and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape Eds BarnesTJDuncanJS (Routledge, New York) pp 231–247
46.
HarveyD, 1973Social Justice and the City (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
47.
HarveyFChrismanN, 1998, “Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology”Environment and Planning A301683–1694
48.
HeppleLW, 1998, “Context, social construction, and statistics: Regression, social science, and human geography”Environment and Planning A30225–234
49.
HeywoodISCorneliusCarverS, 2002An Introduction to Geographical Information Systems2nd edition (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
50.
HuffmanNH, 1997, “Charting the other maps: Cartography and visual methods in feminist research”, in Thresholds in Feminist Geography: Difference, Methodology, Representation Eds JonesJPIIINastHJRobertsSM (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD) pp 255–283
51.
JiangH, 2003, “Stories remote sensing images can tell: Integrating remote sensing analysis with ethnographic research in the study of cultural landscapes”Human Ecology: A Interdisciplinary Journal31215–232
52.
JohnstonRJ, 2000, “On disciplinary history and textbooks: Or where has spatial analysis gone?”Australian Geographical Studies38125–137
53.
JonesJPIIIDixonDP, 1998, “My dinner with Derrida, or spatial analysis and poststructuralism do lunch”Environment and Planning A30247–260
54.
KwanM-P, 1999a, “Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space–time measures”The Professional Geographer51210–227
55.
KwanM-P, 1999b, “Gender, the home–work link, and space–time patterns of non-employment activities”Economic Geography75370–394
56.
KwanM-P, 2002a, “Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research”Annals of the Association of American Geographers92645–661
57.
KwanM-P, 2002b, “Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s”Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography9271–279
58.
KwanM-P, 2002c, “Is GIS for women: a critical reflection”, presentation at the Department of Geography, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 25 October; copy available from the author, Department of Geography, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
59.
LakeRW, 1993, “Planning and applied geography: Positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems”Progress in Human Geography17404–413
60.
LawsonV, 1995, “The politics of difference: Examining the quantitative/qualitative dualism in post-structural feminist research”The Professional Geographer47449–457
61.
LewisGM (Ed.), 1998Cartographic Encounters: Perspectives on Native American Mapmaking and Map Use (University of Chicago Press, IL)
62.
LivingstoneDN, 1992The Geographical Tradition: Episodes in the History of a Contested Enterprise (Blackwell, Oxford)
63.
McDowellL, 1992, “Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series17399–416
64.
McLaffertySL, 1995, “Counting for women”The Professional Geographer47436–442
65.
McLaffertySL, 2002, “Mapping women's worlds: Knowledge, power, and the bounds of GIS”Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography9263–269
66.
MargaiFL, 2001, “Health risks and environmental inequality: A geographical analysis of accidental releases of hazardous materials”The Professional Geographer53422–434
67.
MasseyD, 1985, “New directions in space”, in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 9–19
68.
MatthewsSBurtonLDetwilerJ, 2001, “Viewing people and places: conceptual and methodological issues in coupling geographic information analysis and ethnographic research”, presented at the GIS and Critical Geographic Research conference, New York, 25 February; copy available from Dr Matthews, Sociology and Crime, Law and Justice, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, CA
69.
MilesMBHubermanAM, 1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, London)
70.
NachmiasDFrankfort-Nachmias, 2000Research Methods in the Social Sciences6th edition (St Martin's Press, New York)
71.
OpenshawS, 1991, “A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again”Environment and Planning A23621–628
72.
OpenshawS, 1998, “Towards a more computationally minded scientific human geography”Environment and Planning A30317–332
73.
OpenshawSTaylorPJ, 1979, “A million or so correlated coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem”, in Statistical Applications in the Spatial Sciences Ed. WrigleyN (Pion, London) pp 127–144
74.
PavlovskayaME, 2002, “Mapping urban change and changing GIS: Other views of economic restructuring”Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography9281–289
75.
PavlovskayaME, 2004, “Other transitions: Multiple economies of Moscow households in the 1990s”Annals of the Association of American Geographers94329–351
76.
PeetR, 1998Modern Geographic Thought (Blackwell, Oxford)
77.
PhilipLJ, 1998, “Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to social research in human geography—an impossible mixture?”Environment and Planning A30261–276
78.
PhiloC, with MitchellRMoreA, 1998, “Reconsidering quantitative geography: The things that count”Environment and Planning A30191–201
79.
PicklesJ (Ed.), 1995aGround Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information systems (Guilford Press, New York)
80.
PicklesJ, 1995b, “Representations in an electronic age—geography, GIS and democracy”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ (Guilford Press, New York) pp 1–30
81.
PicklesJ, 1997, “Tool or science? GIS, technoscience, and the theoretical turn”Annals of the Association of American Geographers87363–372
82.
PlummerPS, 2000, “The modeling tradition”, in A Companion to Economic Geography Eds SheppardESBarnesTJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 27–40
83.
PlummerPSSheppardES, 2001, “Must emancipatory economic geography be qualitative?”Antipode33194–200
84.
PlummerPSSheppardESHainingRP, 1998, “Modeling spatial price competition: Marxian versus neoclassical approaches”Annals of the Association of American Geographers88578–594
85.
PoonJPH, 2004, “Quantitative methods: Past and present”Progress in Human Geography28807–814
86.
RobbinsPMaddockT, 2000, “Interrogating land cover categories: Metaphor and method in remote sensing”Cartography and Geographic Information Science27295–309
87.
RobinsonG, 1998Quantitative and Qualitative Techniques in Human Geography (John Wiley, New York)
88.
RocheleauD, 1995, “Maps, numbers, text, and context: Mixing methods in feminist political ecology”The Professional Geographer47458–466
89.
RundstromR, 1995, “GIS, indigenous people, and epistemological diversity”Cartography and Geographic Information systems2245–57
90.
St. MartinK, 1995, “Changing borders, changing cartography: Possibilities for intervening in the new world order”, in Marxism in the Postmodern Age: Confronting the New World Order Eds CallariACullenbergSBiewenerC (Guilford Press, New York) pp 459–468
91.
St. MartinK, 2001, “Making space for community resource management in fisheries”Annals of the Association of American Geographers91122–142
SchuurmanN, 1999a, “Speaking with the enemy? A conversation with Michael Goodchild”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space171–3
94.
SchuurmanN, 1999b, “An interview with Michael Goodchild, January 6, 1998, Santa Barbara, California”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space173–15
95.
SchuurmanN, 2001, “Critical GIS: Theorizing an emerging science”Cartographica36(4) 1–108
96.
SchuurmanN, 2002, “Women and technology in geography: A cyborg manifesto for GIS”The Canadian Geographer46262–265
97.
SchuurmanNKwanM-P, 2004, “Taking a walk on the social side of GIS”Cartographica39 (1) 1–3
98.
SchuurmanNPrattG, 2002, “Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS”Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography9291–299
99.
ScottMCutterSLMenzelCJiM, 1997, “Spatial accuracy of the EPA's environmental hazards databases and their use in environmental equity analysis”Applied Geographic Studies1(1) 45–61
100.
SheppardES, 1993, “Automated geography: What kind of geography for what kind of society?”The Professional Geographer45457–460
101.
SheppardES, 2001, “Quantitative geography: Representations, practices, and possibilities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19535–554
102.
SieberRE, 2004, “Rewiring for GIS/2”Cartographica39 (1) 25–39
103.
SmithS, 2000, “Qualitative methods”, in The Dictionary of Human Geography Eds JohnstonRJGregoryDPrattGWattsM (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 660–662
104.
SparkeM, 1998, “A map that roared and the original atlas: Canada, cartography, and the narration of nation”Annals of the Association of American Geographers88463–495
105.
StraussAL, 1995Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
106.
TashakkoriATeddlieC, 1998Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (Sage, London)
107.
TashakkoriATeddlieC, 2002Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research (Sage, London)
108.
WangF, 2000, “Modeling commuting patterns in Chicago in a GIS environment: A job accessibility perspective”The Professional Geographer52120–133
109.
WeinerDWarnerAHarrisTMLevinRM, 1995, “Apartheid representations in a digital landscape: GIS, remote sensing and local knowledge in Keipersol, South Africa”Cartography and Geographic Information Science2230–44
110.
WescoatJ, 1992, “Common themes in the work of Gilbert White and John Dewey: A pragmatic appraisal”Annals of the Association of American Geographers82587–607
111.
WinchesterHPM, 1999, “Interviews and questionnaires as mixed methods in population geography: The case of lone fathers in Newcastle, Australia”The Professional Geographer5160–67
112.
WingJSt. MartinK, 2005, “The discourse of GIS and the potential for heterodoxy”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Denver, CO, 5–9 April; copy available from Dr St. Martin, Department of Geography, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ
113.
WongDWS, 2003, “Spatial decomposition of segregation indices: A framework toward measuring segregation at multiple levels”Geographical Analysis35 (3) 179–195
114.
WrightDJGoodchildMFProctorJD, 1997, “Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as ‘tool’ versus ‘science’?”Annals of the Association of American Geographers87346–362
115.
YapaL, 1998, “Why GIS needs postmodern social theory and vice versa”, in Policy Issues in Modern Cartography Ed. TaylorDRF (Elsevier Science, Oxford) pp 249–269
