In this paper we aim to assess critically the relationship between devolved government and democratic renewal through a focus on the potential for stakeholder involvement within elected regional assemblies. Drawing particularly upon evidence from North East England, we will consider how the creation of elected assemblies could reinvigorate democracy, given the constraints imposed (in regions such as the North East) by the unreformed and unrepresentative political terrain upon which any new assembly is likely to be superimposed. We conclude that existing arrangements and practices are a useful development but fall far short of the radical measures needed to overcome the exclusionary nature of traditional models of governance and government.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminA, 2004, “Regions abound: Towards a new politics of place”Geografiska Annaler B8633–44.
2.
BarberB, 1984Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
3.
BonneyN, 2003, “The Scottish Parliament and participatory democracy: Vision and reality”Political Quarterly74459–467.
4.
BryneD, 2001, “The reconstruction of Newcastle planning since 1945”, in Newcastle and Modern History Eds CollsRLancasterB, (Phillimore, Chichester, Sussex).
5.
Cabinet Office, DTLR, 2002Your Region, Your Choice: Revitalising the English Regions Cm 9511, Cabinet Office and Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (The Stationery Office, London).
CFER, LGIU, 2004, “Regions that work”, Campaign for the English Regions, 140–150 Pilgrim Street, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 6TH; Local Government Information Unit, 22 Upper Woburn House, London WC1H 0TB.
8.
DETR, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Eland House, Bressenden Place, London SW1E 5DU.
9.
DETR1997Building Partnerships for Prosperity: Sustainable Growth, Competitiveness and Employment in the English Regions Cm 3814 (The Stationery Office, London).
10.
DETR1998, “Guidance on voluntary regional chambers”, press release 11 August.
11.
DETR2001, “Strengthening regional accountability; a consultation paper”.
12.
ElkinS L, 2004, “Thinking constitutionally: The problem of deliberative democracy”Social Philosophy and Policy1(1) 39–75.
13.
ESC, 1999, “Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the role and contribution of civil society organisations in the building of Europe”, Economic and Social Committee, European Commission, Brussels.
14.
Federal Trust, 2003, “Encouraging democracy and stakeholder participation in the English regions”, The Federal Trust for Education and Research, 7 Graphite Square, Vauxhall Walk, London SE11 5EE.
15.
FungAWrightE Olin, 2001, “Deepened democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance”Politics and Society295–41.
16.
GiddensA, 1998The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy (Polity Press, Cambridge).
17.
Government of Wales Act, 1998Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 38 (The Stationery Office, London).
18.
HeldD, 1995Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Metropolitan Governance (Polity Press, Cambridge).
19.
HumphreyLPinkneyE, 2003, “Women's participation in public life: Towards a regional network in the North East”, North East Assembly; copy available from the author.
20.
HumphreyLShawK, 2003, “The engagement of stakeholders in a directly elected regional assembly for the North East”, report for the North East Assembly, Universities of Newcastle and Northumbria; copy available from the authors.
21.
HumphreyLTomaneyJ, 2001, “Regional government and democratic renewal”, report to the Centre for Democratic Policy-Making; copy available from the author.
22.
HuttonW, 1996The State We're In: Why Britain is in Crisis and How to Overcome it (Vintage, London).
23.
JohnstonGPercy-SmithJ, 2003, “In search of social capital”Policy and Politics31321–334.
24.
Labour Party National Policy Forum, 2002, “Democracy, citizenship and political engagement”, The Labour Party, 16 Old Queen Street, London SW1H 9HP.
25.
LeachRPercy-SmithJ, 2001Local Governance in Britain (Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hants).
26.
LindsayI, 2000, “The new civic forums”Political Quarterly71404–411.
27.
LoveringJ, 1999, “Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales)”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23379–395.
28.
McCallCWilliamsonA, 2001, “Governance and democracy in Northern Ireland: The role of the voluntary and community sector after the Agreement”Governance14363–383.
29.
McCordN, 1979North East England: An Economic and Social History (Batsford Academic, London).
30.
MeadowcroftJ, 2001, “Community politics, representation and the limits of deliberative democracy”Local Government Studies27(3) 25–42.
NEA, 2002, “Strengthening accountability in the North East: Scrutiny and policy development first report”, North East Assembly, The Guildhall, Quayside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3AF.
33.
NEA, 2003, “Strengthening accountability in the North East: Scrutiny and policy development second report”, North East Assembly, The Guildhall, Quayside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3AF.
34.
ODPM, 2002, “Analysis of the consultation on the involvement of stakeholders in elected regional assemblies”, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 26 Whitehall, London SW1A 2WH.
35.
ODPM, 2004, “Draft Regional Assemblies Bill: Policy statement”, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 26 Whitehall, London SW1A 2WH.
36.
PetersB GPierreJ, 2001, “Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards multi-level governance”Policy and Politics29131–135.
37.
Public Administration Committee, 2001, “Mapping the quango state: Fifth report of Select Committee on Public Administration” (The Stationery Office, London).
38.
Regional Development Agencies Act, 1998Public General Acts—Elizabeth II chapter 45 (The Stationery Office, London).
39.
RhodesR, 1994, “The hollowing out of the state 4: The changing nature of the public service in Britain”Political Quarterly65138–151.
40.
RobinsonF, 2002, “The North East—a journey through time”Cities6317–334.
41.
RobinsonFShawK, 2003, “Who governs North East England? A regional perspective on governance”, in What Do Boards Do? The Governance of Public and Non-profit Organisations Ed. CornforthC, (Routledge, London) pp 1–27.
42.
RobinsonFShawKHopwoodBGraingerP, 2000, “Who runs the north east … now? A review and assessment of governance in North East England”, Department of Sociology, University of Durham, Durham.
43.
Russell-BarterW, 2002, “Regional government in England: Reviewing the evidence base”, in England: The State of the Regions Eds TomaneyJMawsonJ, (Policy Press, Bristol) pp 11–23.
44.
SandfordM, 2001, “Future steps for regional chambers”, The Constitution Unit, University College, London.
45.
SandfordM, 2002, “The inclusiveness of regional chambers”, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 26 Whitehall, London SW1A 2WH.
46.
ShawKHumphreyLO'BrienPTomaneyJ, 2002, “The engagement of economic and social partners in a directly elected assembly for the North East”, report for the North East Assembly, Universities of Newcastle and Northumbria, Newcastle; copy available from the authors.
47.
SkelcherC, 2000, “Changing image of the state: Overloaded, hollowed-out and congested”Public Policy and Administration15(3) 3–19.
48.
TomaneyJ, 2004, “The regional perspective”, in Making Sense of Localism Eds ColesJCooperYRaynsfordN, (The Smith Institute, London) pp 23–31.
49.
WainwrightH, 1987Labour: A Tale of Two Parties? (Hogarth Press, London).
50.
WhileA, 2000, “Accountability and regional governance”Local Economy14329–345.
