From focus-group and survey research conducted in Istanbul between 1998 and 2002, I argue that the spatial practice of work is critical to the constitution of what it means to ‘be a woman’ in the Turkish context. My approach to gender and work makes use of Butler's theory of performativity in order to show how discourses and practices of work are not only implicated in the production of male and female gender identities but also provide a variety of routes through which different aspects of masculinity and femininity are performed. In my reading of the discussions and debates assembled by the focus-group texts, I try to show how work compels various performances, such as the ‘good woman’ or the ‘bad girl’ in Istanbul. Further, work not only calls forth different ways of being a woman in relation to the city but also produces differentiated female bodies. Finally, I argue that work is a spatial practice through which belonging, identity, and rights are staked in the urban environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhmedL, 1992Women and Gender in Islam (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
2.
AratY, 1995, “Feminism and Islam: considerations on the Journal Kadın ve Aile”, in Women in Modern Turkish Society Ed. TekeliS (Zed Books, London) pp 66–78
3.
AratZ F, 1998, “Introduction: politics of representation and identity”, in Deconstructing Images of ‘The Turkish Woman’ Ed. AratZ F (Macmillan, London) pp 1–36
4.
BeneriaLRoldanM, 1987The Crossroads of Class and Gender (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
5.
BolakH C, 1995, “Towards a conceptualization of marital power dynamics: women breadwinners and working-class households in Turkey”, in Women in Modern Turkish Society Ed. TekeliS (Zed Books, London) pp 173–198
6.
BondiL, 1992, “Gender and dichotomy”Progress in Human Geography1698–104
7.
BoserupE, 1970Women's Role in Economic Development (St Martin's Press, New York)
8.
Buck-MorssS, 1986, “The flaneur, the sandwichman and the whore: the politics of loitering”New German Critique3999–139
9.
ButlerJ, 1990Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (Routledge, London)
10.
ÇağatayNNuhoğlu-SoysalY, 1995, “Comparative observations on feminism and the nation-building process”, in Women in Modern Turkish Society Ed. TekeliS (Zed Books, London) pp 263–272
11.
ChantS, 1991Women and Survival in Mexican Cities: Perspectives on Gender, Labour Markets and Low-income Households (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
12.
ChatterjeeP, 1993The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NY)
13.
ÇinarE M, 1994, “Unskilled urban migrant women and disguised employment: home-working women in Istanbul, Turkey”World Development22369–380
14.
DauberRCainM L (Eds), 1981Women and Technological Change in Developing Countries (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
15.
De CerteauM, 1984The Practice of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
16.
EcevitF Y, 1995, “The status and changing forms of women's labour in the urban economy”, in Women in Modern Turkish Society Ed. TekeliS (Zed Books, London) pp 81–88
17.
EraydinAErendilA, 1999, “The role of female labor in industrial restructuring: new production processes and labor market relations in the Istanbul clothing industry”Gender, Place and Culture6259–272
18.
ErmanT, 2001, “Rural migrants and patriarchy in Turkish cities”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25118–133
19.
EşimS, 2000, “Solidarity in isolation: urban informal sector women's economic organizations in Turkey”Middle Eastern Studies36140–152
20.
FrancisE, 1995, “Migration and changing divisions of labour: gender relations and economic change in Koguta, Western Kenya”Africa65197–215
21.
GöleN, 1996The Forbidden Modern: Civilization and Veiling (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
22.
GossJ DLeinbachT R, 1996, “Focus groups as alternative research practice: experience with transmigrants in Indonesia”Area28115–123
23.
HansonSPrattG, 1995Gender, Work and Space (Routledge, London)
24.
Hays-MitchellM, 1999, “From survivor to entrepreneur: gendered dimensions of microenterprise development in Peru”Environment and Planning A31251–271
25.
HollosM, 1991, “Migration, education, and the status of women in southern Nigeria”American Anthropologist93852–870
26.
IncirlioğluE O, 1998, “Images of village women in Turkey: models and anomalies”, in Deconstructing Images of The Turkish Woman Ed. AratZ F (Macmillan, London) pp 198–223
27.
IsinE, 2002Being Political: Genealogies of Citizenship (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
28.
JayawardenaK, 1986Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World (Zed Books, London)
29.
KandiyotiD, 1991, “Introduction”, in Women, Islam and the State Ed. KandiyotiD (Macmillan, London) pp 1–21
30.
KandiyotiD, 1997, “Gendering the modern: on missing dimensions in the study of Turkish modernity”, in Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey Eds BosdoğanSKasabaR (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA) pp 113–132
31.
KobayashiAPeakeLBenensonHPicklesK, 1994, “Introduction: placing women and work” in Women, Work and Place Ed. KobayashiA (McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal) pp ix–xiv
32.
KofmanEPeakeL, 1990, “Into the 1990s: a gendered agenda for political geography”Political Geography Quarterly9313–336
33.
KuyaşN, 1982, “Female labor power relations in the urban Turkish family”, in Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey Ed. KağtçıbaşıÇ (Indiana University Turkish Studies, Bloomington, IN) pp 181–206
34.
LaclauEMouffeC, 1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (Verso, London)
35.
LaurieN, 1999, “State-backed work programmes and the regendering of work in Peru: negotiating femininity in ‘the provinces’”Environment and Planning A31229–250
36.
LaurieNDwyerCHollowayS LSmithF M, 1999Geographies of New Femininities (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
37.
LawsonV A, 1998, “Hierarchical households and gendered migration in Latin America: feminist extensions to migration research”Progress in Human Geography2239–53
38.
LawsonV, 1999, “Tailoring is a profession, seamstressing is work! Resiting work and reworking gender identities among artisanal garment workers in Quito”Environment and Planning A31209–227
39.
LeonardM, 2001, “Old wine in new bottles? Women working inside and outside the household”Women's Studies International Forum2467–78
40.
LevineN, 1982, “Social change and family crisis: the nature of Turkish divorce”, in Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey Ed. KağıtçbaşıÇ (Indiana University Turkish Studies, Bloomington, IN) pp 323–248
41.
McClureK, 1992, “On the subject of rights: pluralism, plurality and political identity”, in Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community Ed. MouffeC (Verso, London) pp 108–127
42.
McDowellL, 1997Capital Culture: Gender at Work in The City (Blackwell, Oxford)
43.
McDowellLCourtG, 1994, “Missing subjects: gender, power and sexuality in merchant banking”Economic Geography70229–251
44.
MarstonS A, 1990, “Who are ‘the people’?: gender, citizenship, and the making of the American nation”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space8449–458
45.
MiesM, 1982The Lace Makers of Narsapur: Indian Housewives Produce for the World Market (Zed Books, London)
46.
MoghadamV M, 1992, “Development and women's emancipation: is there a connection?”Development and Change23215–255
47.
MohantyC T, 1991, “Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses”, in Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism Eds MohantyC TRussoATorresL (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN) pp 51–80
48.
MohantyC T, 1997, “Women workers and capitalist scripts: ideologies of domination, common interests, and the politics of solidarity”, in Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures Eds AlexanderM JMohantyC T (Routledge, London) pp 3–29
49.
MontellF, 1999, “Focus group interviews: a new feminist method”NWSA Journal1144–71
50.
NatterWJonesJ PIII, 1997, “Identity, space and other uncertainties”, in Space and Social Theory: Interpreting Modernity and Postmodernity Eds BenkoGStrohmayerU (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 141–161
51.
ÖzbayF, 1995, “Changes in women's activities both inside and outside the home”, in Women in Modern Turkish Society Ed. TekeliS (Zed Books, London) pp 89–111
52.
ÖzyeğinG, 2001Untidy Gender: Domestic Service in Turkey (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
53.
PhillipsM W, 1998, “Gendered work: an analysis of work in a Fijian garment factory”Australian Geographer29341–355
54.
PrattG, 1999, “From registered nurse to registered nanny: discursive geographies of Filipina domestic workers in Vancouver, BC”Economic Geography75215–236
55.
RadcliffeS, 1991, “The role of gender in peasant migration: conceptual issues from the Peruvian Andes”Review of Radical Political Economics23129–147
56.
RadcliffeS, 1996, “Gendered nations: nostalgia, development and territory in Ecuador”Gender, Place and Culture35–21
57.
RedcliftNSinclearT (Eds), 1991Working Women: International Perspectives on Labour and Gender Ideology (Routledge, London)
58.
RoccoR, 2000, “Associational rights-claims, civil society and place”, in Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City Ed. IsinE F (Routledge, London) pp 218–239
59.
SecorA J, 2002, “The veil and urban space in Istanbul: women's dress, mobility and Islamic knowledge”Gender, Place and Culture95–22
60.
SrinivasanS, 1997, “Breaking rural bonds through migration: the failure of development for women in India”Journal of Comparative Family Studies2889–102
61.
TekeliS, 1986, “Emergence of the new feminist women in Turkey”, in The New Women's Movement Ed. DahlerupD (Sage, London) pp 179–199
62.
TiendaMBoothK, 1991, “Gender, migration and social change”International Sociology651–72
63.
WGSG, 1997Feminist Geographies: Explorations in Diversity and Difference Women and Geography Study Group (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
64.
WhiteJ B, 1994Money Makes Us Relatives: Women's Labor in Urban Turkey (Texas University Press, Austin, TX)
65.
WhiteJ B, 1996, “Family industry in Istanbul: labor and social identity”Trialog4932–36
66.
WhiteJ B, 2002, “The Islamist paradox”, in Fragments of Culture: The Everyday of Modern Turkey Eds KandiyotiDSaktanberA (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 191–217
67.
WilkinsonS, 1998, “Focus groups in feminist research: power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning”Women's Studies International Forum21111–124
68.
WilkinsonS, 1999, “Focus groups: a feminist method”Psychology of Women Quarterly23221–244
69.
ZeytinoğluI U, 1998, “Constructed images as employment restrictions: determinants of female labor in Turkey”, in Deconstructing Images of ‘The Turkish Woman’ Ed. AratZ F (Macmillan, London) pp 183–197
