Agglomeration offers both static, cost-based advantages and dynamic, innovation-related benefits to participating firms. These ideas have informed regional development policy from the growth poles/centres of the 1950/1960s to the contemporary focus on clusters. Although such policies imply the theoretical prospect of regional diversification by exploiting supply-chain and information-based/knowledge-based relationships, in practice they tend to promote regional specialisation. The experiences of many old industrial areas emphasise the risks of specialisation as advantages mutate into liabilities (territorial lock-in). These experiences are ignored in much of the clusters discourse which often lacks historical perspective. This paper provides such perspective by reflecting upon the relationships between the dynamics of industry evolution, agglomeration, and regional development policy with reference to the chemical industry on Teesside in North East England.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AminACohendetP, 1999, “Learning and adaptation in decentralised business networks”Environment and Planning D, Society and Space1787–104.
2.
AroraALandauRRosenbergN (Eds), 1998Chemicals and Long Term Economic Growth (John Wiley, New York).
3.
AsheimB T, 1996, “Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’: A Condition for prosperity”European Planning Studies4379–400.
4.
AudretschD BFeldmanM P, 1996, “Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle”Review of Industrial Organisation11253–273.
5.
BelussiF, 1996, “Local systems, industrial districts and institutional networks: Towards an evolutionary paradigm of industrial economies?”European Planning Studies45–26.
6.
BeynonHHudsonRSadlerD, 1994A Place Called Teesside: A Locality in a Global Economy (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh).
7.
BoschmaRLambooyJ, 1999, “The prospects of an adjustment policy based on collective learning in old industrial regions”Geojournal49391–399.
BowerJ L, 1986When Markets Quake: The Management Challenge of Restructuring Industry. (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).
10.
CEFIC, 2004Horizon 2015: Perspectives for the European Chemical IndustryEuropean Chemical Industry Council, Avenue Evan Nieuwenhuyse, 4 box 1, B-1160 Brussels.
11.
ChapmanK, 1984, “Petrochemicals and economic development: A Review of expectations and experiences”, in Regional Diversification and Structural Change Eds BarrB MWatersN (Tantalus, Vancouver) pp 87–98.
12.
ChapmanK, 1986Chemicals and the Cleveland EconomyDepartment of Geography, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
13.
ChapmanK, 1991The International Petrochemical Industry: Evolution and Location (Blackwell, Oxford).
14.
Chemicals Innovation and Growth Team, 2002Enhancing the Competitiveness and Sustainability of the UK Chemicals IndustryDepartment of Trade and Industry, Victoria Street, London SW1H OET.
15.
ClarkG LWrigleyN, 1995, “Sunk costs: A Framework for economic geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series20204–223..
16.
Cleveland County Council, 1977Teesside Structure PlanCleveland County Council, Middlesbrough.
17.
CookePMorganK, 1998The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
18.
DarwentD F, 1969, “Growth poles and growth centres in regional planning—a review”Environment and Planning15–32.
19.
DTI, Department of Trade and Industry, Victoria Street, London SW1H OET1995, Press notice, 7 June.
20.
DTI, Department of Trade and Industry, Victoria Street, London SW1H OET 1998Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge-driven Economy Cm 4176 (The Stationery Office, London).
21.
DTI, Department of Trade and Industry, Victoria Street, London SW1H OET 1963The North East: A Programme for Regional Development and Growth Cmnd 2206 (HMSO, London).
22.
FeserE J, 1998, “Old and new theories of industry clusters”, in European Research in Regional Science, Volume 8. Clusters and Regional Specialisation Ed. SteinerM (Pion, London) pp 18–40.
23.
FreemanCSoeteL, 1997The Economics of Industrial Innovation3rd edition (Pinter, London).
24.
FriedrichsJ, 1993, “A theory of urban decline. Economy, democracy and political elites”Urban Studies30907–917.
25.
FritzO MMahringerHValderrammaM T, 1998, “A risk-oriented analysis of regional clusters”, in European Research in Regional Science, Volume 8. Clusters and Regional Specialisation Ed. SteinerM (Pion, London) pp 181–191.
26.
GHK, 2001Tees Valley Baseline and Scenario StudyGHK International Canada Ltd, Toronto.
27.
GlaeserE L, 2000, “The new economics of urban and regional growth”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkG LFeldmanMGertlerM (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 83–98.
28.
GlasmeierA, 1994, “Flexible districts, flexible regions? The institutional and cultural limits to districts in an era of globalisation and technological paradigm shifts”, in Globalisation, Institutions and Regional Development Eds AminAThriftN (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 118–146.
GrabherG, 1993, “The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area”, in The Embedded Firm: On the Socio-economics of Industrial Networks Ed. GrabherG (Routledge, London) pp 255–277.
31.
GrabherGStarkD (Eds), 1997Restructuring Networks in Postsocialism: Legacies, Linkages and Localities (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
32.
GrecoL, 2002Industrial Redundancies: A Comparative Analysis of the Chemical and Clothing Industries in the UK and Italy (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
33.
HassinkR, 1997, “What distinguishes ‘good’ from ‘bad’ industrial agglomerations”Erdkunde512–11.
34.
HassinkRLagendijkA, 2001, “The dilemmas of interregional institutional learning”Environment and Planning C: Government and Planning1965–84.
35.
HerrigelG, 1996, “Crisis in German decentralised production: Unexpected rigidity and the challenge of an alternative form of flexible organisation in Baden WürttembergEuropean Urban and Regional Studies333–52.
36.
HillE NBrennanJ F, 2000, “A methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: The foundation of regional competitive advantage”Economic Development Quarterly1465–96.
37.
HudsonR, 1989Wrecking a Region: State Policies, Party Politics and Regional Change in North East England (Pion, London).
38.
HudsonR, 1994, “Institutional changes, cultural transformation and economic regeneration: Myths and realities from Europe's old industrial regions”, in Globalisation, Institutions and Regional Development Eds AminAThriftN (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 331–345.
39.
IsaksenA, 2003, “Lock-in of regional clusters: The case of offshore engineering in the Oslo area”, in Co-operation, Networks and Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems Eds BrennerTFornahlD (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 247–276.
40.
IsardWSchoolerE WVietoriszT, 1959Industrial Complex Analysis and Regional Development (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
41.
JansenACM, 1970, “The value of the growth pole theory for economic geography”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie6167–76.
LeverW F, 1980, “Manufacturing linkages, industrial dynamics and the transmission of growth”Regional Science and Urban Economics10491–502.
44.
LittleA D, 2002Pharmaceuticals and Specialities in the North East report to One NorthEast, Stella House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NY.
45.
LittleA D, 2003, “The Teesside petrochemical cluster study”, presentation to Teesside stakeholders, 17 October.
46.
LorenzenM, 2001, “Localised learning and policy: Academic advice on enhancing regional competitiveness through learning”European Planning Studies9163–185.
47.
LundequestPPowerD, 2002, “Putting Porter into practice? Practices of regional cluster building: Evidence from Sweden”European Planning Studies10685–704.
48.
MacKinnonDCumbersAChapmanK, 2002, “Learning, innovation and regional development: A Critical appraisal of recent debates”Progress in Human Geography26293–295.
49.
MalmbergAMaskellP, 2002, “The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering”Environment and Planning A34429–449.
50.
MarkusenA R, 1985Profit Cycles, Oligopoly and Regional Development (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
51.
MarkusenA R, 1996, “Sticky places in slippery space: A Typology of industrial districts”Economic Geography72293–313.
52.
MartinRSunleyP, 2003, “Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?”Journal of Economic Geography35–35.
53.
MelachroinosJ ASpenceN, 2001, “Conceptualising sunk costs in economic geography: Cost recovery and the fluctuating value of fixed capital”Progress in Human Geography25347–364.
54.
NorcliffeG, 1984, “Industrial specialisation versus industrial diversification: An assessment of policy alternatives”, in Regional Diversification and Structural Change Eds BarrBWatersN M (Tantalus, Vancouver) pp 7–24.
55.
Northern Region Strategy Team, 1976The Chemical Industry in the Northern Region: Trends and Prospects (Northern Region Strategy Team, Newcastle upon Tyne).
56.
NutiFCainelliG, 1996, “Changing directions in Italy's manufacturing industrial districts: The case of the Emilian footwear districts of Fusignano and San Mauro Pascoli”Journal of Industry Studies3105–118.
57.
One NorthEast, 2002Realising Our Potential: The Regional Economic Strategy for the North East of EnglandOne NorthEast, Stella House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NY.
58.
One NorthEast, Teesside Chemicals Initiative, Pharmaceuticals and Specialities Cluster, and Tees Valley Partnership, 2002The Creation of an Operating Framework to Support Investment in the Chemical Industry in the North East of EnglandSubmission to the Department of Trade and Industry, One NorthEast, Stella House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NY.
59.
OwenGHarrisonT, 1995, “Why ICI chose to demerge”Harvard Business Review March/April, 133–142.
60.
PerrouxF, 1950, “Economic space: Theory and applications”Quarterly Journal of Economics6489–104.
61.
PettigrewA, 1985The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI (Blackwell, Oxford).
62.
PinchSHenryNJenkinsMTallmanS, 2003, “From ‘industrial districts’ to ‘knowledge clusters‘: A Model of knowledge dissemination and competitive advantage in industrial agglomerations”Journal of Economic Geography3373–388.
63.
PorterM E, 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Macmillan, London).
64.
PorterM E, 1998On Competition (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).
65.
PouderRSt. JohnC H, 1996, “Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation”Academy of Management Review211192–1225.
66.
ReaderW J, 1975Imperial Chemical Industries: A History, Volume 2 (Oxford University Press, London).
67.
RosenfeldS A, 1997, “Bringing business clusters into the mainstream of economic development”European Planning Studies53–23.
68.
SadlerD, 2004, “Cluster evolution, the transformation of old industrial regions and the steel industry supply chain in North East England”Regional Studies3855–66.
69.
SadlerDThompsonJ, 2001, “In search of regional industrial culture: The role of labour organisations in old industrial regions”Antipode33660–686.
70.
SaxenianA L, 1994Regional Advantage Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
71.
SchoenbergerE, 1997The Cultural Crisis of the Firm (Blackwell, Oxford).
72.
ScottA J, 1998Regions and the World Economy: The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition and Political Order (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
73.
ScottJ, 1976, “How much more can Teesside take?”New Scientist 15 July, 118–120.
74.
SemmonsPWB, 1970, “The chemical industry”, in Durham County and City with Teesside Ed. DewdneyJ C (British Association, Durham) pp 330–340.
75.
SpitzP H, 1988Petrochemicals: The Rise of an Industry (John Wiley, New York).
76.
SteinerM, 1985, “Old industrial areas: A Theoretical approach”Urban Studies22387–398.
77.
SteinerM (Ed.), 1998European Research in Regional Science, Volume 8. Clusters and Regional Specialisation (Pion, London).
Tees Valley Development Company, no date, “Teesside: a prime location for a European investment in chemicals manufacture”, brochure.
83.
TERU, TBR, 2002The Tees Valley: Economic Future Report for the Tees Valley Partnership by Training and Employment Research Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow and Trends Business Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, http://www.tbv.co.uk.
84.
TichyG, 1991, “The product cycle re-visited: Some extensions and clarifications”. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften11127–54.
85.
TichyG, 1998, “Clusters: Less dispensable and more risky than ever”, in European Research in Regional Science, Volume 8. Clusters and Regional Specialisation Ed. SteinerM (Pion, London) pp 226–237.
86.
TigheC, 2004, “Former ICI site to become garden centre”Financial Times 6 February, page 5.
87.
Trends Business Research, 2001Business Clusters in the UK: A First Assessment report for the Department of Trade and Industry, Victoria Street, London SW1H OET.
88.
VallerDWoodANorthP, 2000, “Local governance and local business interests: A Critical review”Progress in Human Geography24409–428.
89.
WhitfordJ, 2001, “The decline of a model? Challenge and response in the Italian industrial districts”Economy and Society3058–85.
90.
Wilton International, no date Connect to Wilton International promotional brochure, Wilton International, PO Box 1985, Wilton, Middlesbrough TS90 8WS.
