In this paper I argue that a neo-Gramscian strategic relational approach (SRA) offers the relational and constructivist perspectives necessary to enhance our concrete and theoretical understandings of urban governance. Moreover, I argue for the utility of using discourse as a productive entry point for neo-Gramscian analysis. Taking a discursive approach to a case study of the governance of ‘global Sydney’ since the mid-1990s, I explore how engaging a neo-Gramscian SRA can connect theoretically informed explanation of the practical accomplishment of urban governance to its broader politico-economic embeddedness and to the territoriality of the state. I explore how the activation of Sydney's governance via the hegemonic project of producing the ‘competitive city’ is shaping a contingent and scaled state form—with a specific (and scaled) institutional form, regime of representation, and range of interventions. Additionally, I consider how counterhegemonic claims and currents shape this process. The relational and constructivist perspectives of the neo-Gramscian SRA ensure that, at all times, urban governance is understood both as a multiscalar production and as a political construction. The result of neo-Gramscian analysis, then, is more theoretically informed and theoretically informative studies of the situated practice of urban governance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Access Economics and Maunsell McIntyre, 2000Sydney's Gateways to the 21st Century Committee for Sydney, http://www.sydney.org.au/index.htm
2.
AllenL, 2001, “Beggars beware: Sydney wants more” Australian Financial Review 2 February, page 1
3.
Antipode2002, “From the new localism to the space of neoliberalism”, special issue 34(3)
4.
AtkinsonR, 1999“Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration”Urban Studies3659–72
5.
BellS, 1997Ungoverning the Economy: The Political Economy of Australian Economic Policy (Oxford University Press, Melbourne)
6.
BrennerN, 1998“Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16459–481
7.
BrennerN, 1999“Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The rescaling of urban governance in the European Union”Urban Studies3431–451
8.
BrennerN, 2000“The urban question as a scale question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24362–378
9.
BrennerNTheodoreN, 2002a“Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’”Antipode34349–379
10.
BrennerNTheodoreN, 2002b“Preface: From the ‘new localism’ to the spaces of neoliberalism”Antipode34341–347
11.
CaplingAConsidineMCrozierM, 1998Australian Politics in the Global Era (Longman, Melbourne)
12.
CernyP, 1990The Changing Architecture of Politics (Sage, London)
13.
City of Sydney, 1999Positioning Sydney as the Clever City Council of the City of Sydney, Sydney
CochraneA, 1999, “Redefining urban politics for the twenty-first century”, in The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later Eds JonasAWilsonD (SUNY Press, Albany, NY) pp 109–124
16.
CollingeC, 1999“Self-organisation of society by scale: A spatial reworking of regulation theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17557–574
17.
CollingeCHallS, 1997, “Hegemony and regime in urban governance: Towards a theory of the locally networked state”, in Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Division Eds JewsonNMacGregorS (Routledge, New York) pp 132–140
18.
CoxK R, 1993“The local and the global in the new urban politics: A critical view”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11433–448
19.
CoxK, 1998“Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scales, or: Looking for local politicsPolitical Geography171–24
20.
CoxK, 2001“Territoriality, politics and the urban”Political Geography20745–762
21.
CoxKJonasA, 1993“Urban development, collective consumption and the politics of metropolitan fragmentation”Political Geography128–37
22.
CoxK RMairA, 1988“Locality and community in the politics of local economic development”Annals of the Association of American Geographers78307–325
23.
CoxK RMairA, 1991“From localised social structures to localities as agents”Environment and Planning A23197–213
24.
CS, Committee for Sydney, http://www.sydney.org.au/index.htm1998Sydney 2020: The City We Want. Summary Report PriceWaterhouseCoopers 2001 The Golden Egg: Terms of Reference
25.
DalyMPritchardB, 2000, “Sydney: Australia's financial and corporate capital”, in Sydney: The Emergence of a World City Ed. ConnellJ (Oxford University Press, Melbourne) pp 167–189
26.
DEWR, 2002NSW Industry Trends January 2002NSW State Office, Analysis and Communication Unit, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, GPO Box 9879, Sydney, NSW 2001
27.
DSRD, Department of State and Regional Development, PO Box N818, Sydney, NSW 1220
28.
1998Annual Report
29.
1999aWorking Together for Growth position paper
30.
1999bAnnual Report
31.
2000aStrategic Plan 2000–2003
32.
2000bAnnual Report
33.
2002aInvestment Guide
34.
2002bAnnual Report
35.
DUAP, Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, GPO Box 3927, Sydney, NSW 2001
36.
1998Annual Report
37.
2000Annual Report
38.
2001Plan First: Review of Plan Making in NSW white paper
39.
DuncanSGoodwinM, 1988The Local State and Uneven Development (Polity Press, Cambridge)
40.
FaganRWebberM, 1999Global Restructuring: The Australian Experience (Oxford University Press, Melbourne)
41.
FarrarAInglisJ, (Eds), 1996Keeping it Together: State and Civil Society in Australia (Pluto Press, Sydney)
42.
FemiaJ, 1981Gramsci's Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
43.
GoldingS, 1988, “The concept of the philosophy of praxis in the Quaderni of Antonio Gramsci”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL (University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL) pp 543–563
44.
GoughJ, 2001, “Workers' strategies to secure jobs, their uses of scale, and competing notions of justice”, paper presented to the American Association of Geographers Conference, New York, February; copy available from the author, Division of Geogrpahy and Environmental Management, Lipman Building, University of Northumbria, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
45.
GramsciA, 1995Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks edited and translated by BoothmanD (Lawrence and Wishart, London)
46.
HajerM, 1989City Politics, Hegemonic Projects and Discourse (Avebury, Sydney)
47.
HastingsA, 1999“Analysing power relations in partnerships: Is there a role of discourse analysis?”Urban Studies3691–106
48.
HayC, 1996Re-stating Social and Political Change (Open University Press, Milton Keynes)
49.
HayC, 1998, “The tangled webs we weave; the discourse, strategy and practice of networking”, in Comparing Policy Networks Ed. HayC (Open University Press, Milton Keynes) pp 33–52
50.
HayC, 1999“Crisis and the structural transformation of the state”British Journal of Politics and International Relations1317–344
51.
ImbroscioD, 1998“Reformulating urban regime theory—the division of labor between state and market reconsidered”Journal of Urban Affairs20233–248
52.
JensonJ, 1989“Paradigms and political discourse: Protective legislation in France and the United States before 1914”Canadian Journal of Political Science22235–258
53.
JensonJ, 1990“Representations in crisis: The roots of Canada's permeable Fordism”Canadian Journal of Political Science23653–683
54.
JensonJ, 1993“Naming nations: Making nationalist claims in Canadian public discourse”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology30337–358
55.
JensonJ, 1995“Mapping, naming and remembering: Globalisation at the end of the twentieth century”Review of International Political Economy296–116
56.
JessopB, 1983“Accumulation strategies, state forms and hegemonic projects”Kapitalistate10/1189–112
57.
JessopB, 1990State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place (Polity Press, Cambridge)
58.
JessopB, 1997a, “A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes: Accumulation strategies, hegemonic projects, and governance”, in Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in Global Economy Ed. LauriaM (Sage, London) pp 51–74
59.
JessopB, 1997b, “The entrepreneurial city: Re-imaging localities, redesigning economic governance, or restructuring capital?”, in Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Division Eds JewsonNMcGregorS (Routledge, London) pp 28–41
60.
JessopB, 1998a, “The narrative of enterprise and the enterprise of narrative: Place marketing and the entrepreneurial city”, in The Entrepreneurial City: Geographers of Politics, Regime and Representation Eds HallTHubbardP (John Wiley, New York) pp 77–102
61.
JessopB, 1998b“The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development”International Social Science Journal5029–46
62.
JessopB, 2001“Institutional re(turns) and the strategic – relational approach”Environment and Planning A331213–1235
63.
JessopB, 2002aThe Future of the Capitalist State (Polity Press, Cambridge)
64.
JessopB, 2002b“Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance”Antipode34452–472
65.
JessopBBonnettKBromleySLingT, 1988Thatcherism: A Tale of Two Nations (Polity Press, Cambridge)
66.
JessopBPeckJTickellA, 1999, “Retooling the machine”, in The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives, Two Decades Later Eds JonasAWilsonD (SUNY Press, Albany, NY) pp 141–162
67.
JewsonNMcGregorS, 1997, “Transforming cities: Social exclusion and the reinvention of partnership”, in Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions Eds JewsonNMcGregorS (Routledge, London) pp 1–15
68.
JohnPColeA, 1998“Urban regimes and local governance in Britain and France—policy adaption and coordination in Leeds and Lille”Urban Affairs Review33382–404
69.
JonasA E G, 1994“The scale politics of spatiality”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space12257–264
70.
JonasA, 1996“In search of order: Traditional business reformism and the crisis of neoliberalism in Massachusetts”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series21617–634
71.
JonesM R, 1997“Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance”Environment and Planning A29831–864
72.
JonesMMacLeodG, 1999“Towards regional renaissance? Reconfiguring and rescaling England's economic governance”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series24295–313
73.
KeilR, 1998“Globalization makes states: Perspective of local governance in the age of the world city”Review of International Political Economy5616–646
74.
KeilR, 2002“‘Common sense’ neoliberalism: Progressive conservative urbanism in Toronto, Canada”Antipode24578–601
75.
KellyP, 1994The End of Uncertainty: Power, Politics and Business in Australia (Allen and Unwin, Sydney)
76.
KipferSKeilR, 2002“Toronto Inc? Planning the competitive city in Toronto”Antipode34227–264
77.
LaclauEMouffeC, 1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (Verso, London)
78.
LaffinMPainterM, 1995Reform and Reversal: Lessons from the Coalition Government in New South Wales 1988–1995 (Macmillan, Melbourne)
79.
LarnerWLeHeronR, 2002“The spaces and subjects of a globalising economy: A situated exploration of method”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20753–774
80.
LauriaM, (Ed.) 1997aReconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in Global Economy (Sage, London)
81.
LauriaM, 1997b, “Introduction: Reconstructing urban regime theory”, in Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics in Global Economy (Sage, London) pp 1–11
82.
LeitnerHSheppardE, 2002“‘The city is dead, long live the net’: Harnessing European interurban networks for a neoliberal agenda”Antipode34495–518
83.
LewisSBoyleJ, 1999, “Push may hit the wall”Australian Financial Review 12 April, page 3
84.
McGovernS, 2001“Cultural hegemony as an impediment to urban protest movements: Grassroots activism and downtown development in Washington, DC”Journal of Urban Affairs23419–443
85.
McGuirkP M, 2003a“Producing the capacity to govern in global Sydney: A multiscaled account”Journal of Urban Affairs25201–223
86.
McGuirkP M, 2003b, “Planning central Sydney”, in Making Space Ed. MacLaranA (Edward Arnold, London) pp 118–147
87.
MacLeodG, 1999“Entrepreneurial spaces, hegemony, and state strategy: The political shaping of privatism in Lowland Scotland”Environment and Planning A31345–375
88.
MacLeodG, 2001“Beyond soft institutionalism: Accumulation, regulation, and their geographical fixes”Environment and Planning A331145–1167
89.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999a“Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: On the state, politics, scale and explanation”Political Geography18697–730
90.
MacLeodGGoodwinM, 1999b“Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance”Progress in Human Geography23503–527
91.
MacLeodGJonesM, 1999“Reregulating a regional rustbelt: Institutional fixes, extrepreneurial discourse, and the ‘politics of representation’”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17575–605
92.
MarshDRhodesR, 2000“Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach”Political Studies484–21
93.
MarshDSmithM, 2000“Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectic approach”Political Studies484–21
94.
National Economics, 2000A Framework for Whole of State Developmentprepared by National Economics for the Local Government and Shires Associations of NSW, Suite 803, 16–20 Barrack St, Sydney, 2000
95.
NSW Urban Taskforce, 2001Property and Infrastructure: A Future Strategy for the Sydney Metropolis (NSW Urban Taskforce, Sydney)
96.
O'ConnorKStimpsonBDalyM, 2001Australia's Changing Economic Geography (Oxford University Press, Melbourne)
97.
O'NeillP MMcGuirkP M, 2002“Recognising the script you're in: Prosperity along the Eastern seaboard”Australian Geographer33241–261
98.
PaasiM, 1991“Deconstructing regions: Notes on the scales of spatial life”Environment and Planning A23239–256
99.
PainterJ, 2000“A Third Way for Europe: Discourse, regulation and the European questions in Britain”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie91227–236
100.
PainterJGoodwinM, 1995“Local governance and concrete research: Investigating the uneven development of regulation”Economy and Society24334–356
101.
PainterM, 1997, “Reshaping the public sector”, in New Developments in Australian Politics Eds GalliganBMcAllisterIRavenhillJ (Macmillan Education, Melbourne) pp 148–166
2001Working with Government: Guidelines for Privately Funded Projects (NSW Government, Sydney)
110.
PeckJ, 2001Workfare States (Guilford Press, New York)
111.
PeckJ, 2002“Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare”Economic Geography78331–360
112.
PeckJJessopB, 1998, “Fast policy/local discipline: Global – local dialectics in the workfare offensive”, paper presented to the 94th Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Boston, 25–29 March; copy available from J Peck, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
PeetR, 2002“Ideology, discourse and the geography of hegemony: From socialist to neoliberal development in post-apartheid South Africa”Antipode3454–84
115.
PritchardBMcManusP, (Eds), 2000Land of Discontent: The Dynamics of Change in Rural and Regional Australia (UNSW Press, Sydney)
116.
Productivity Commission, 1999Impact of Competition Policy Reforms on Rural and Regional Australia report 8 (Ausinfo, Canberra)
117.
PurcellM, 2002“The state, regulation, and global restructuring: Reasserting the political in political economy”Review of International Political Economy9298–332
118.
RacoMImrieR, 2000“Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy”Environment and Planning A322187–2204
119.
RansomeP, 1992Antonio Gramsci: A New Introduction (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
120.
RobinsonJ, 2002“Global and world cities: A view from off the map”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26531–554
121.
SassenS, 2003“Globalization or denationalization? Annual RIPE Lecture”Review of International Political Economy101–22
122.
ScottA, 2001Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
123.
SearleGBoundsM, 1999“State powers, state land and competition for global entertainment: The case of Sydney”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research23165–172
124.
SmithM, 2001Rethinking State Theory (Routledge, London)
125.
SmithN, 2002“New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy”Antipode34427–450
126.
StillwellFTroyP, 2000“Multilevel governance and urban development in Australia”Urban Studies37909–930
127.
StoneC, 1989Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946–1988 (University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS)
128.
SwyngedouwE, 1997, “Neither global nor local: ‘globalization’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK (Guilford Press, New York) pp 138–166
129.
SwyngedouwE, 2000“Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1863–76
130.
VallerDBetteleyD, 2001“The politics of ‘integrated’ local policy in England”Urban Studies382393–2413
131.
VallerEWoodANorthP, 2000“Local governance and local business interests: A critical review”Progress in Human Geography24409–428
132.
Van DjikT, 1997Discourse as Structure and Process, volume 1 (Sage, London)
133.
WardK, 1996“Rereading urban regime theory: A sympathetic critique”Geoforum27427–438
134.
WilliamsR, 1973, “Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory”New Left Review number 82, 3–16
