In the paper we address the way Japanese housebuilders have developed innovative approaches to supplying highly customised housing. We draw on notions of path dependency to explore the evolution of Japan's large-scale industrialised housing suppliers, the way they have differentiated themselves from local suppliers, and their possible future evolution. We first outline how structural conditions influence the business strategies adopted by housebuilders in general. We then consider the evolution of the Japanese mass customised housebuilding industry, the innovations it has introduced across its production system, and how these have been shaped by the structural conditions within which the industry operates. Finally, we draw conclusions on the role of path dependency in shaping Japan's mass customised housing sector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldenJ, 1986, “Some strengths and weaknesses of Japanese urban planning”Town and Planning Review57127–134.
2.
BallM, 1983Housing Policy and Economic Power: The Political Economy of Owner Occupation (Methuen, London).
3.
BallM, 1996Housing and Construction: A Troubled Relationship? (Policy Press, Bristol).
4.
BarlowJ, 1999, “From craft production to mass customisation: Innovation requirements for the UK housebuilding industry”Housing Studies1423–42.
5.
BarlowJKingA, 1992, “The state, the market, and competitive strategy: The housebuilding industry in the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden”Environment and Planning A24381–400.
6.
BarlowJOzakiR, 2001, “Are you being served? Japanese lessons on customer-focused housebuilding” report of a Department of Trade and Industry Expert Mission, Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex.
7.
BarlowJOzakiR, 2003, “Customer focus in private housebuilding: Lessons from other industries, current practice and the potential of new technologies”Housing Studies1887–101.
8.
BarlowJChilderhousePGannDHong-MinhSNaimNOzakiR, 2003, “Choice and delivery in housebuilding: Examples from Japan”Building Research and Information31(3) 134–145.
9.
BottomDGannDGroákSMeikleJ, 1996, “Innovation in Japanese prefabricated housebuilding industries”, Construction Research and Information Association, Classic House, 174-180 Old Street, London EC1V 9BP.
10.
CalliesD, 1994, “Land use planning and control in Japan”, in Planning for Cities and Regions in Japan Eds ShapiraPMasserIEdgingtonD (Liverpool University Press, Liverpool) pp 59–69.
11.
ClarkeLWallC, 1996Skills and Construction Process: A Comparative Study of Vocational Training and Quality in Social HousebuildingJoseph Rowntree Foundation, The Homestead, 40 Water End, York YO30 6WP.
12.
CohenDGastonC, 2002, “Update on current housing trends in Japan: focus on reform and longevity”, unpublished report prepared for the Manufacturing Industries Branch of Industry Canada; copy available from Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
13.
EcclesR, 1981, “The quasi-firm and the construction industry”Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation2335–357.
14.
FukutakeT, 1989, The Japanese Social Structure: Its Evolution in the Modern Century2nd edition (University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo).
15.
GannD, 1996, “Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialised housing and car production in Japan”Construction Management and Economics14437–450.
16.
GannDBiffinMConnaughtonJDaceyTHillAMoseleyRYoungC, 1999Flexibility and Choice in Housing (Policy Press, Bristol).
17.
GranovetterM, 1985, “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”American Journal of Sociology19481–510.
HarrisRBuzzelliM, 2003, “The virtual housebuilder: constructing divisions of spatial labour”, unpublished report, School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
21.
HebbertM, 1992, “Sen-biki amidst desakota: urban sprawl and urban planning in Japan”, in Planning for Cities and Regions in Japan Ed ShapiraPMasserIEdgingtonD W (Liverpool University Press, Liverpool) pp 70–91.
22.
HendryJ, 1995Understanding Japanese Society2nd edition (Routledge, London).
23.
HooperANicolC, 2000, “Design practice and volume production in speculative housebuilding”Construction Management and Economics18295–310.
24.
IkegamiH, 1997Jyutaku Gyokai Handobuku [Housing industry handbook] (Toyo Keizai, Tokyo).
25.
IwashitaS, 1990, “Production integration in Japanese housing”Habitat International14235–243.
26.
IwashitaS, 2001, “Custom made housing in Japan and the growth of the super subcontractor”Construction Management and Economics19295–300.
27.
KirwanR, 1987, “Fiscal policy and the price of land and housing in Japan”Urban Studies24345–360.
28.
LeijonhufvudA, 1977, “Costs and consequences of inflation”, in The Microeconomic Foundations of Macroeconomics Ed. HarcourtG (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 381–400.
29.
McKellarJ, 1993, “Building technology and the production process”, in House, Home and Community: Progress in Housing Canadians, 1945–1986 Ed. MironJ (McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal and Kingston) pp 136–154.
30.
Management and Coordination Agency, 1993The Survey of Housing StatisticsManagement and Coordination Agency, Government of Japan, Tokyo.
31.
NaimMBarlowJ, 2003, “An innovative supply chain strategy for customised housing”Construction Management and Economics21593–602.
32.
NicolCHooperA, 1999, “Contemporary change and the housebuilding industry: Concentration and standardisation in production”Housing Studies1457–76.
33.
OzakiR, 1999Society, Culture and House Form in England and Japan unpublished PhD thesis, Graduate Research Centre in Social Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex.
34.
OzakiR, 2001, “Society and housing form: Home-centredness in England vs. family-centredness in Japan”Journal of Historical Sociology14337-–357.
35.
PatchellJ, 2002, “Linking production and consumption: The co-evolution of interaction systems in the Japanese house industry”Annals of the Association of American Geographers92284–301.
36.
PavittK, 1984, “Patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory”Research Policy13343–373.
37.
SabelCZeitlinJ, 1985, “Historical alternatives to mass production: Politics, markets and technology in 19th century industrialization”Past and Present108133–176.
38.
ScrantonP, 1987Proprietary Capitalism: The Textile Manufacture at Philadelphia 1800–1885Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
39.
ScrantonP, 1994, “Manufacturing diversity: Production systems, markets, and an American consumer society, 1870–1930,”Technology and Culture35476–505.
40.
ShibataT, 1990, “Daitoshi kou chika mondai to toshi kaihatsu” [Problems of high land prices in metropolitan areas and urban development], in Daitoshi no tochi mondai to seisaku [Land problems in metropolitan areas and policies], Ed. IshidaY (Nihon Hyouron Sha, Tokyo).
41.
SlaughterS, 1998, “Models of construction innovation”Journal of Construction Engineering and Management124226–231.
42.
Tochi RiyouKenkyukai, 1999Hayawakari Kokudo Riyo Keikaku-ho [Understanding the Land Use Planning Act] (Taisei Shuppan-sha, Tokyo).
43.
WilliamsKHaslamCWilliamsJ, 1992, “Ford versus ‘Fordism’: The beginnings of mass production”Work, Employment and Society6517–555.
44.
WoodallB, 1992, “The politics of land in Japan's dual political economy”, in Land Issues in Japan: A Policy Failure? Eds HaleyJYamamuraK, Society for Japanese Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-3650.
45.
YoshidaK, 1990, “Genkouhou no paradaimu to tochi kihonhou” [A paradigm of existing legislation and the Basic Land Act], in Tochikihonhou woyomu [Reading of the Basic Land Act], Eds HonmaYHaradaSIgarashiT (Nihon Keizai Hyouron sha, Tokyo).
46.
ZetterJ, 1986, “Challenges for Japanese urban policy: Some findings from the OECD review”Town Country and Planning Review57135–140.
47.
ZhouNLoganJ, 1996, “Market transition and the commodification of housing in urban China”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20400–421.
