Since 1997 the border between Hong Kong and Mainland China has been officially referred to as a boundary, instead of a border. In this paper the author analyses to what extent actual changes in cross-border interactions support this notional change. It points to an ongoing step-by-step integration process on the functional level. The main empirical basis of this analysis is a survey on cross-border trips in 1999, supplemented by additional data. In looking at the changing boundary regime between Hong Kong and Mainland China the author also develops a framework for the study of border regimes and their transformation in general.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BreitungW, 2001Hongkong und der Integrationsprozess: Räumliche Strukturen und planerische Konzepte in Hongkong [Hong Kong and the integration process: spatial structures and planning concepts in Hong Kong] (Wepf, Basel).
2.
CastellsM, 1989The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban–Regional Process (Blackwell, Oxford).
3.
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong1996Hong Kong Monthly Digest of Statistics November.
4.
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong1997, “Hong Kong residents married in Mainland China”, Special Topics Report, 15.
5.
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong1999, “Hong Kong residents with spouse/children in the mainland of China”, Special Topics Report, 22.
6.
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong2000Hong Kong Monthly Digest of Statistics March.
7.
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong2001, “Hong Kong residents working in the mainland of China”, Special Topics Report, 30, pp 31–75.
8.
DAB, 1999, “Summer consumer behaviour survey”, Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong, Northern District Office, Fanling, Hong Kong.
9.
DonnanHWilsonT M, 1999Borders: Frontiers of Identity, Nation and State (Berg, Oxford).
10.
FauN, 1999, “Hong Kong et Singapour, des métropoles transfrontalières” [Hong Kong and Singapore, transborder metropolitan areas]L'Espace géographique28241–255.
11.
GuldinG E, 1995, “Toward a Greater Guangdong: Hong Kong's sociocultural on the Pearl River Delta and beyond”, in The Hong Kong–Guangdong Link: Partnership in Flux Eds KwokR Y WSoA Y (Sharpe, Armonk, NY) pp 89–118.
12.
Hang Seng Bank, 1999, “The rise in cross-border consumption”Hang Seng Economic Monthly February.
13.
HelliwellJ F, 1998How Much Do National Borders Matter? (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
14.
HerzogL A, 1990Where North meets South: Cities, Space and Politics on the US–Mexican Border (University of Texas Press, Austin, TX).
15.
HirstPThompsonG, 1995, “Globalization and the future of the nation state”Economy and Society24408–442.
16.
HoK CSoA Y, 1997, “Semi-periphery and borderland integration: Singapore and Hong Kong experiences”Political Geography16241–259.
17.
KoK, 2000, “HK buyers drawn to value over the border” South China Morning Post 27 September Kolossov V, O'Loughlin J, 1998, “New borders for new world orders: Territorialities at the fin-desiecle”Geojournal44259–273.
18.
KwokS, 1998, “Elderly fear cost of dying in Guangdong”South China Morning Post 27 October.
19.
LeeV, 1997, “Elderly set for homes in China”South China Morning Post 2 June.
20.
LeimgruberW, 1991, “Boundary, values and identity: The Swiss-Italian transborder region”, in The Geography of Border Landscapes Eds RumleyDMinghiJ V (Routledge, London) pp 43–62.
21.
LiS M, 1995, “Economic integration between Hong Kong and Mainland China and its implications for industrial relocation in Hong Kong”Bulletin of the Geographical Society of China231–24.
22.
LiS, 2000, “Bargain hunters cross the border”South China Morning Post 26 April.
23.
LinC S G, 1997Red Capitalism in South China: Growth and Development of the Pearl River Delta (UBC Press, Vancouver).
24.
MartinezO J, 1994Border People: Life and Society in the US–Mexico Borderlands (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ).
25.
MasseyD BJessP, 1995A Place in the World? Places, Cultures and Globalization (Open University Press, Milton Keynes).
26.
MDR, 2000, “Cross boundary travel survey”, MDR Technology Ltd, Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong, with Planning Department, Hong Kong.
27.
MinghiJ V, 1991, “From conflict to harmony in border landscapes”, in The Geography of Border Landscapes Eds RumleyDMinghiJ V (Routledge, London) pp 15–30.
28.
NewmanDPaasiA, 1998, “Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography”Progress in Human Geography22186–207.
29.
PrescottJ R V, 1987Political Frontiers and Boundaries (Allen and Unwin, London).
30.
RattiR, 1993, “Strategies to overcome barriers: From theory to practice, in Theory and Practice of Transborder Cooperation Eds RattiRReichmannS (Helbing u. Lichtenhahn, Basel) pp 241–267.
31.
RietveldP, 2001, “Obstacles to openness of border regions in Europe”, in Gaining Advantage from Open Borders: An Active Space Approach to Regional Development Eds Van GeenhuizenMRattiR (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 79–96.
32.
SanjuanT, 1997A l'ombre de Hong Kong, le delta de la rivière des Perles [In the shadow of Hong Kong, the Pearl River Delta] (L'Harmattan, Paris).
33.
ScheinerJ, 2000Eine Stadt—zwei Alltagswelten? Ein Beitrag zur Aktionsraumforschung und Wahrnehmungsgeographie im vereinten Berlin [One city—two living spheres? A contribution to activity space research and perception geography in the reunited Berlin] (Reimer, Berlin).
SibleyD, 1995Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West (Routledge, London).
36.
SitVWongS L, 1989Small and Medium Industries in an Export-oriented Economy. The Case of Hong Kong (University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong).
37.
SkeldonR, 1997, “Hong Kong: Colonial city to global city to provincial city? ” Cities14(5) 265–271.
38.
SungY W, 1998Hong Kong and South China: The Economic Synergy (City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong).
39.
SzetoW, 1997, “Plea for pupils crossing border”South China Morning Post 24 November.
40.
TaylorP J, 1996, “Territorial absolutism and its evasions”Geography Research Forum161–12.
41.
TohM HLowL, 1993Regional Cooperation and Growth Triangles in ASEAN (Times Academic Press, Singapore).
42.
Van der WustenH, 1994, “Variations of territoriality: States and borders in present-day Europe, in Political Boundaries and Coexistence Ed. GalluserW (Peter Lang, Bern) pp 402–412.
43.
Van GeenhuizenMRattiR, 2001Gaining Advantagefrom Open Borders. An Active Space Approach to Regional Development (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants).
44.
Wastl-WalterDKoflerA, 2000, “Grenzforschung als Thema der Politischen Geographie—Rückblick und Perspektiven” [Border research as an issue of political geography—retrospection and perspectives], in Festschrift für Martin Seger Ed. PalencsarF (Institut für Geographie und Regionalforschung, Klagenfurt, Austria) pp 259–269.
45.
Wesley-SmithP, 1998Unequal Treaty 1898–1997: China, Great Britain, and Hong Kong's New Territoriesrevised edition (Oxford University Press, Hong Kong).
46.
WuC T, 1998, “Cross-border development in Europe and Asia”GeoJournal44(3) 189–201.
47.
Yang Cheng Wan Pao2001, “Guang Dong Shen Tong Ji Ju Gong Bu Di Wu Ci Quan Guo Ren Kou Pu Cha Zhu Yao Shu Ju” [Yang Chen Evening News “Guangdong Province Statistic Bureau's fifth national population census and its important figures”] 16 April, www.cpirc.org.cn/5cendata21.htm.
48.
YehA G O, 1996, “Planning of Hong Kong's border area”, in Planning Hong Kong for the 21st Century: A Preview of the Future Role of Hong Kong Ed. YehA G O, Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, pp 303–328.
