This paper uses the case of the Khong-Chi-Mun (KCM) interbasin transfer project in northeast Thailand to explore questions of power and scale in the context of state intervention in river basins. The KCM project figures strongly in the Thai state's long-term aim of transforming its water-poor northeast region through large-scale irrigation works and agroindustrial development. The project has also become a key element in interstate negotiations over coordinated development of the Lower Mekong Basin. The early stages of the project have met with resistance in the form of both national and local Thai social movements arguing against it on social justice and ecological grounds. Proponents of the project in the Thai government are employing different scalar narratives to justify and legitimate implementation of the scheme. Scale and power are intimately related within complex environmental conflicts, and tracing their linkages through an array of actors and across a variety of scales, the approach associated with actor-network methodologies, can reveal a great deal about how power and scale are co-created.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 1999, “The new geopolitics of power”, in Human Geography Today Eds MasseyDAllenJSarreP (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 173–193
2.
AllenJ, 1999, “Spatial assemblages of power: from domination to empowerment”, in Human Geography Today Eds MasseyDAllenJSarreP (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 194–218
3.
AllenT H F, 1998, “The landscape ‘level’ is dead: persuading the family to take it off the respirator”, in Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications Eds PetersonDParkerV T (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 35–54
4.
AminA, 2002, “Spatialities of globalisation”Environment and Planning A34385–399
5.
BallT, 1992, “New faces of power”, in Rethinking Power Ed. WartenbergT (SUNY Press, Albany, NY) pp 14–31
Biwater, 1987Investigation and Preparation of a Water Resource Development Programme for North East Thailand, Final Report: Water Resources (Kingdom of Thailand, Bangkok)
8.
BrennerN, 2001, “The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration”Progress in Human Geography25591–614
9.
BurgessJClarkJHarrisonC, 2000, “Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme”Ecological Economics35119–132
10.
CallonM, 1986, “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”, in Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge Ed. LawJ (Routledge, London) pp 196–232
11.
CallonMLawJ, 1995, “Agency and the hybrid collectif”South Atlantic Quarterly94481–507
12.
CastreeNBraunB, 1998, “The construction of nature and the nature of construction: analytical and political tools for building survivable futures”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium Eds BraunBCastreeN (Routledge, London) pp 3–42
ChainarongSKittimaNOlssonA, 2000, “Social impacts of the Rasi Salai dam, Thailand: loss of livelihood security and social conflict”, paper prepared for the Fourth Regional Consultation of the World Commission on Dams, Hanoi, Vietnam, 26–27 February, http://www.dams.org/kbase/submissions/showsub.php?rec=soc174
15.
ChallinorD (Ed.), 1973Some Environmental Considerations for the Mekong Basin ProjectSoutheast Asia Development Advisory Group of the Asia Society, 725 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10021
16.
CleggS, 1989Frameworks of Power (Sage, London)
17.
CoxK, 1997, “Representation and power in the politics of scale”Political Geography1741–44
18.
DangL V, 1967, “Problems related to fisheries in the Mekong delta”, paper presented at Seminar on Economic Development in the Mekong Delta, Mekong Committee, Bangkok; copy available from the author
19.
DarierE (Ed.), 1999Discourses of the Environment (Blackwell, Oxford)
20.
DeanM, 1999Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society (Sage, London)
21.
DelaneyDLeitnerH, 1997, “The political construction of scale”Political Geography1693–97
22.
EdenSTunstallS MTapsellS M, 2000, “Translating nature: river restoration as nature–culture”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18257–273
23.
GlassmanJ, 2002, “From Seattle (and Ubon) to Bangkok: the scales of resistance to corporate globalization”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20513–533
24.
GOT, 1976The Fourth National Economic and Social Development Plan (1977–1981)National Economic and Social Development Board, Office of the Prime Minister, Government of Thailand, Bangkok
25.
HindessB, 1996Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault (Blackwell, Oxford)
26.
HirschP, 1997, “Environment and environmentalism in Thailand: material and indeological bases”, in Seeing Forests for Trees: Environment and Environmentalism in Thailand Ed. HirschP (Silkworm Books, Chiang Mai, Thailand) pp 15–36
27.
HowittR, 2002, “Scale and the other: Levinas and geography”Geoforum33299–313
28.
JessopB, 2000, “The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24323–360
29.
JonesK, 1997, “Scale as epistemology”Political Geography1725–28
30.
JonesM, 2001, “The rise of the regional state in economic governance: ‘partnerships for prosperity’ or new scales of state power?”Environment and Planning A331185–1211
31.
KamolS, 1995, “Mekong: a river in peril”The Nation [Bangkok] 7 April, pages A8–10
32.
KortelainenJ, 1999, “The river as an actor-network: the Finnish forest industry utilization of lake and river systems”Geoforum30235–247
33.
LatourB, 1986, “The powers of association”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 264–280
34.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern translated by PorterC (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
35.
LatourB, 1998, “To modernize or ecologise? That is the question”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium Eds BraunBCastreeN (Routledge, London) pp 221–242
36.
LatourB, 1999, “On recalling ANT”, in Actor Network Theory and After Eds LawJHassardJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 15–25
37.
LawJ (Ed.), 1986Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? (Routledge, London)
38.
LawJ (Ed.), 1991A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination (Routledge, London)
39.
LeeR, 2000, “Radical and postmodern? Power, social relations, and regimes of truth in the social construction of alternative economic geographies”Environment and Planning A32991–1009
40.
LevinS, 1992, “The problem of pattern and scale in ecology”Ecology731943–1967
41.
LohmannL, 1998, “Mekong dams in the drama of development”Watershed350–60
42.
LukeT, 1995, “Sustainable development as a power/knowledge system: the problem of governmentality”, in Greening Environmental Policy: The Politics of a Sustainable Future Eds FischerFBlackM (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 21–32
43.
LukeT, 1999Capitalism, Democracy, and Ecology: Departing from Marx (University of Chicago Press, Urbana, IL)
44.
MarstonS, 2000, “The social construction of scale”Progress in Human Geography24219–242
45.
MarstonSSmithN, 2001, “States, scales and households: limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner”Progress in Human Geography25615–619
46.
Mekong Committee, 1972Report of the Eighteenth Session of the Advisory Board of the Mekong Committee Bangkok, 27 September–4 October, Mekong River Commission Secretariat, PO Box 1112, 364 Preah Monivong Boulevard, Phnom Penh
47.
Mekong Committee, 1973Report of the Sixty-second Session (Special) of the Mekong Committee Tokyo, 11–23 April, Mekong River Commission Secretariat, PO Box 1112, 364 Preah Monivong Boulevard, Phnom Penh
48.
Mekong Secretariat, 1977Thailand and the Mekong Project (Mekong River Commission Secretariat, PO Box 1112, 364 Preah Monivong Boulevard, Phnom Penh)
49.
Mekong Secretariat, 1989The Mekong Committee: A Historical Account (1957–89)Mekong River Commission Secretariat, PO Box 1112, 364 Preah Monivong Boulevard, Phnom Penh
50.
MurdochJ, 1998, “The spaces of actor-network theory”Geoforum29357–374
51.
MurdochJMarsdenT, 1995, “The spatialization of politics: local and national actor-spaces in environmental conflict”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series20368–380
52.
NguyenT D, 1999The Mekong River and the Struggle for Indochina: Water, War, and Peace (Praeger, Westport, CT)
53.
Nippon Koei Co Ltd, 1993The Study on the Regional Development Plan for the Lower Northeast and the Upper East Regions in the Kingdom of Thailand, Final ReportJapan International Cooperation Agency and National Economic and Social Development Board, Bangkok
54.
OnnuchaH, 1998, “Conflict turns into political game”Bangkok Post 30 November, page 3
55.
PennapaH, 2000, “Minister orders opening of Rasi Salai dam gates”The Nation [Bangkok] 7 July, page A4
56.
Pohl-WostlC, 1998, “Ecosystem organization across a continuum of scales: a comparative analysis of lakes and rivers”, in Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications Eds PetersonDParkerV T (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 141–170
RadcliffeS, 1999, “Popular and state discourses of power”, in Human Geography Today Eds MasseyDAllenJSarreP (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 219–242
59.
RamboT, 1991, “The human ecology of rural resource management in northeast Thailand”, Farming Systems Research Project, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
60.
RoseM, 2002, “The seductions of resistance: power, politics, and a performative style of systems”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20383–400
61.
RyderG, 1994, Special Mekong issueWorld Rivers Report9 (fourth quarter)
62.
SharpJRoutledgePPhiloCPaddisonR, 2000aThe Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance (Routledge, London)
63.
SharpJRoutledgePPhiloCPaddisonR, 2000b, “Entanglements of power: geographies of domination/resistance”, in The Entanglements of Power: Geographies of Domination/Resistance Eds SharpJRoutledgePPhiloCPaddisonR (Routledge, London) pp 1–42
64.
SlaterD, 1997, “Spatialities of power and postmodern ethics—rethinking geopolitical encounters”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1555–72
65.
SlaterD, 2002, “Other domains of democratic theory: space, power, and the politics of democratization”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20255–276
66.
SmithN, 1996, “Spaces of vulnerability: the space of flows and the politics of scale”Critique of Anthropology1663–77
67.
SmithN, 1998, “Nature at the millennium: production and re-enchantment”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium Eds BraunBCastreeN (London: Routledge) pp 3–42
68.
SneddonC, 2000Altered Rivers: Socio-ecological Transformations, Water Conflicts and the State in Northeast Thailandunpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
69.
SneddonC, 2002, “Water conflicts and river basins: the contradictions of comanagement and scale in Northeast Thailand”Society and Natural Resources15725–742
70.
SneddonCNguyenB T, 2001, “Politics, ecology and water: the Mekong Delta and development of the Lower Mekong Basin”, in Living with Environmental Change: Social Vulnerability, Adaptation and Resilience in Vietnam Eds AdgerNKellyMNguyenH N (Routledge, London) pp 234–262
71.
SneddonCHarrisLDimitrovRÖzesmiU, 2002, “Contested waters: conflict, scale, and sustainability in aquatic socioecological systems”Society and Natural Resources15663–676
72.
SombatR, 1993, “Cry for water” Bangkok Post 22 August, page 20
73.
SwyngedouwE, 1997a, “Power, nature, and the city. The conquest of water and the political ecology of urbanization in Guyaquil, Ecuador: 1880–1990”Environment and Planning A29311–332
74.
SwyngedouwE, 1997b, “Neither global nor local: ‘glocalization’ and the politics of scale”, in Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local Ed. CoxK (Guilford Press, New York) pp 137–166
75.
SwyngedouwE, 2000, “Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1863–76
76.
TDSC, 1994, “Community forests: local knowledge of sustainable conservation”Thailand Development Support Committee Newsletter2650–52
77.
The Nation [Bangkok], 2000, “Protestors seize dam in Si Sa Ket”, 20 May, page A2
78.
TuanY, 1984Dominance and Affection: The Making of Pets (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
79.
USBR, 1956Reconnaissance Report: Lower Mekong River Basin prepared for International Cooperation Administration, United States Bureau of Reclamation
80.
WalakkamonE, 1995, “Here comes the flood of floods”The Nation [Bangkok] 26 April, pages C1–C2
81.
WartenbergT (Ed.), 1992Rethinking Power (SUNY Press, Albany, NY)
82.
Watershed1995, “Mekong politics: ‘new era’, same old plans”Watershed124–29
83.
WhatmoreSThorneL, 1997, “Nourishing networks: alternative geographies of food”, in Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring Eds GoodmanDWattsM (Routledge, London) pp 287–304
84.
WongsomsakS, 1986, “Salinization in Northeast Thailand”Southeast Asian Studies24133–153
85.
YuwadeeTChakritR, 1997, “Irrigation scheme wins PM's backing” Bangkok Post 12 April, page 2
