The literature on the theory of regional industrial success, including that focused on regional innovation systems, provides the conceptual foundation for this exploration of the extent to which firms in clusters of advanced technology industry depend on interregional sources for a wide variety of knowledge inputs to support innovation. The substantive focus is the electronics cluster of the Toronto region, Canada's largest manufacturing center. A small, stratified sample of establishments drawn from this cluster is used to verify the importance of external sources of material inputs, and other knowledge sources, and the strength of distant market connections. Interregional and local collaboration vary in importance as a result of scale-dependent resource differences between firms and in response to choices associated with foreign rather than domestic ownership. The results support the rejection of simple models of clusters and learning regions in which internal connections are privileged over interregional and international transactions operating either between or within firms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhernR, 1993, “The role of strategic alliances in the international organization of industry”Environment and Planning A251229–1246
2.
AminARobinsK, 1990, “The re-emergence of regional economies? The mythical geography of flexible accumulation”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space87–34
3.
AndersonM, 1995, “The role of collaborative integration in industrial organization: observations from the Canadian aerospace industry”Economic Geography7155–78
4.
AngelD PEngstromJ, 1995, “Manufacturing systems and technological change in the US personal-computer industry”Economic Geography7179–102
5.
AntonelliC, 2000, “Collective knowledge communication and innovation: the evidence of technological districts”Regional Studies34535–547
6.
AritaTMcCannP, 2000, “Industrial alliances and firm location behaviour: some evidence from the US semiconductor industry”Applied Economics321391–1403
7.
ArundelAGeunaA, 2001, “Does proximity matter for knowledge transfer from public institutes and universities to firms?”, SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, 73, www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/
8.
AsheimB TCookeP, 1999, “Local learning and interactive innovation networks in a global economy”, in Making Connections Eds MaleckiE JOinasP (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 145–178
9.
AydalotPKeebleD (Eds), 1988High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments: The European Experience (Routledge, London)
10.
BestM H, 1990, The New Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
11.
BlankSHaarJ, 1998Making NAFTA Work: U.S. Firms and the New North American Business Environment (North–South Center Press, University of Miami, Miami, FL)
12.
BramantiARattiR, 1997, “The multifaced dimensions of local development”, in The Dynamics of Innovative Regions Eds RattiRBramantiAGordonR (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 3–44
13.
BreschiSLissoniF, 2001, “Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: knowledge ‘tacitness’ reconsidered”Papers in Regional Science80255–273
14.
BrittonJ N H, 1998, “Is the impact of the North American Trade Agreements zero? The Canadian case”Canadian Journal of Regional Science21167–196
15.
BrittonJ N H, 1999, “Does nationality still matter? The new competition and the foreign ownership question revisited”, in The New Industrial Geography Eds BarnesTGertlerM S (Routledge, London) pp 238–264
16.
BruscoS, 1982, “The Emilian model: productive decentralization and social integration”Cambridge Journal of Economics6167–184
17.
BrysonJ RDanielsP W, 1998, “Business Link, strong ties, and the walls of silence: small and medium-sized enterprises and external business-service expertise”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy16265–280
ClarkG L, 1993, “Global interdependence and regional development: business linkages and corporate governance in a world of financial risk”18309–325
20.
CoeN MTownsendA R, 1998, “Debunking the myth of localized agglomerations: the development of a regionalized service economy in South-East England”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series23385–404
21.
CoffeyW JShearmurR, 1997, “The growth and location of high order services in the Canadian urban system, 1971–1991”The Professional Geographer49404–418
22.
CookeP, 1998, “Introduction: origins of the concept”, in Regional Innovation Systems Eds BraczykH-JCookePHeidenreichM (UCL Press, London) pp 2–27
23.
CookeP, 2001, “From technopoles to regional innovation systems: the evolution of localised technology development policy”Canadian Journal of Regional Science2421–39
24.
CookePWillsD, 1999, “Small firms, social capital and the enhancement of business performance through innovation programmes”Small Business Economics13219–234
25.
CornishS L, 1997, “Product innovation and the spatial dynamics of market intelligence: does proximity to markets matter?”Economic Geography73143–165
26.
D'CruzJ RRugmanA M, 1992New Compacts for Canadian CompetitivenessKodak Canada Inc., 3500 Eglinton Avenue W, Toronto M6M 1V3
27.
DiGiovannaS, 1996, “Industrial districts and regional economic development: a regulation approach”Regional Studies30373–386
28.
DunningJ H, 1997Alliance Capitalism and Global Business (Routledge, London)
29.
EdenL, 1994, “Who does what after NAFTA? Location strategies of U.S. multinationals”, in Multinationals in North America Ed. EdenL (University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta) pp 193–252
30.
EdquistC, 1997Systems of Innovation—Technologies, Institutions and Organizations (Pinter, London)
EttlingerN, 1997, “An assessment of the small-firm debate in the United States”Environment and Planning A29419–442
33.
FeldmanM P, 1994The Geography of Innovation (Kluwer, Boston, MA)
34.
FeldmanM P, 2000, “Location and innovation: the new economic geography of innovation, spillovers, and agglomeration”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkG LFeldmanM PGertlerM S (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 373–394
35.
FloridaR, 1995, “Toward the learning region”Futures27527–536
36.
FreemanC, 1987Technology Policy and Economic Performance—Lessons from Japan (Pinter, London)
37.
FreemanCPerezC, 1988, “Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour”, in Technical Change and Economic Theory Eds DosiGFreemanCNelsonRSilverbergGSoeteL (Pinter, London) pp 38–66
38.
GardinerPRothwellR, 1989, “The strategic management of re-innovation”R&D Management19147–160
39.
GertlerM S, 1995, “‘Being there’: proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies”Economic Geography701–26
40.
GertlerM SWolfeD AGarkutD, 1998, “The dynamics of regional innovation in Ontario”, in Local and Regional Systems of Innovation Eds De la MotheJPaquetG (Kluwer, Boston, MA) pp 211–238
41.
GertlerM SWolfeD AGarkutD, 2000, “No place like home? The embeddedness of innovation in a regional economy”Review of International Political Economy7688–718
42.
GlaeserE L, 2000, “The new economics of urban and regional growth”, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography Eds ClarkG LFeldmanM PGertlerM S (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 83–98
GranovetterM, 1985, “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness”American Journal of Sociology91481–510
45.
GrayMGolobEMarkusenA, 1996, “Big firms, long arms, wide shoulders: the ‘hub-and-spoke’ industrial district in the Seattle region”Regional Studies30651–666
46.
GrotzRBraunB, 1993, “Networks, milieux and individual firm strategies: empirical evidence of an innovative SME environment”Geografiska Annaler B75149–162
47.
GrotzRBraunB, 1997, “Territorial or trans-territorial networking: spatial aspects of technology-oriented cooperation within the German mechanical engineering industry”Regional Studies31545–557
48.
HarrisonBKelleyM RGantJ, 1996, “Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change”Economic Geography72233–258
49.
HenryNPinchS, 2000, “Spatialising knowledge: placing the knowledge community of Motor Sport Valley”Geoforum31191–208
50.
HolbrookJ A DSquiresR J, 1996, “Firm-level analysis of determinants of Canadian industrial R&D performance”Science and Public Policy23369–374
51.
HowellsJ, 1990, “The internationalization of R&D and the development of global research networks”Regional Studies24495–512
52.
HowellsJ, 1999a, “Regional systems of innovation?”, in Innovation Policy in a Global Economy Eds ArchibugiDHowellsJMichieJ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 67–93
53.
HowellsJ, 1999b, “Research and technology outsourcing”Technology Analysis and Strategic Management1117–29
54.
Information Design Associates, with ICF Kaiser International, 1997Cluster-based Economic DevelopmentUS Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, Washington, DC
55.
IsaksenA, 2001, “Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in a global economy”Canadian Journal of Regional Science24101–120
56.
JaffeA, 1989, “The real effects of academic research”American Economic Review79957–970
57.
JaffeATrajtenbergMHendersonR, 1993, “Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations”Quarterly Journal of Economics108577–598
58.
KeebleDLawsonCLawton-SmithHMooreBWilliamsonF, 1998, “Internationalisation processes, networking and local embeddedness in technology-intensive small firms”Small Business Economics11327–342
59.
KeebleDLawsonCMooreBWilkinsonF, 1999, “Collective learning processes, networking and ‘institutional thickness’ in the Cambridge region”Regional Studies33319–332
60.
KlineSRosenbergN, 1986, “An overview of the process of innovation”, in The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth Eds LandauRRosenbergN (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) pp 275–306
61.
LarssonSMalmbergA, 1999, “Innovations, competitiveness and local embeddedness—a study of machinery producers in Sweden”Geografiska Annaler B811–18
62.
LlobreraJ TMeyerD RNammacherG, 2000, “Trajectories of industrial districts: impact of strategic intervention in medical districts”Economic Geography7668–98
63.
LundvallB-Å, 1988, “Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation”, in Technical Change and Economic Theory Eds DosiGFreemanCNelsonRSilverbergGSoeteL (Pinter, London) pp 349–369
64.
LundvallB-Å (Ed.), 1992National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (Pinter, London)
65.
LundvallB-ÅJohnsonB, 1994, “The learning economy”Journal of Industrial Studies123–42
66.
LyonsD, 1995, “Agglomeration economies among high technology firms in advanced production areas: the case of Denver/Boulder”Regional Studies29265–278
67.
McCannP, 1995, “Rethinking the economics of location and agglomeration”Urban Studies32563–577
68.
MacPhersonA, 1988a, “Industrial innovation in the small business sector: empirical evidence from metropolitan Toronto”Environment and Planning A20953–971
69.
MacPhersonA, 1988b, “New product development among small Toronto manufacturers: empirical evidence on the role of new technical service linkages”Economic Geography6462–75
70.
MacPhersonA, 1997, “The contribution of external service inputs to the product development efforts of small manufacturing firms”R&D Management27127–144
71.
MaillatD, 1991, “The innovation process and the role of the milieu”, in Regions Reconsidered Eds BergmanEMaierGTödtlingF (Mansell, London) pp 103–117
72.
MalmbergAMaskellP, 2002, “The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering”Environment and Planning A34429–449
73.
ManzagolC, 1991, “The rise of a technological complex: some comments on the Phoenix case”. in Industrial Change and Regional Development Eds BenkoGDunfordM (Belhaven Press, London) pp 237–251
74.
MarkusenA, 1996, “Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts”Economic Geography72293–313
75.
MarkusenALeeY-SDiGiovannaS, 1999Second Tier Cities: Rapid Growth Beyond the Metropolis (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
76.
MaskellP, 2001, “Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster”Industrial and Corporate Change10921–943
77.
MaskellPMalmbergA, 1999a, “The competitiveness of firms and regions: ‘ubiquitification’ and the importance of localized learning”European Urban and Regional Studies69–25
78.
MaskellPMalmbergA, 1999b, “Localised learning and industrial competitiveness”Cambridge Journal of Economics23167–186
79.
MaskellPTörnqvistG, 1999Building a Cross-border Learning Region (Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen)
80.
MorganK, 1997, “The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal”Regional Studies31491–503
81.
MundayMMorrisJWilkinsonB, 1995, “Factories or warehouses—a Welsh perspective on Japanese transplant manufacturing”Regional Studies291–17
82.
NarulaRHagedoornJ, 1999, “Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements”Technovation19283–294
83.
NauwelaersCReidA, 1995, “Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential”Scientometrics34497–511
84.
NelsonR R (Ed.), 1993National Innovation Systems (Oxford University Press, New York)
85.
NiosiJ, 1996, “Strategic technological collaboration in Canadian industry: towards a theory of flexible or collective innovation”, in Technological Collaboration Eds CoombsRRichardsASaviottiP PWalshV (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos) pp 98–118
86.
OakeyRRothwellRCooperS, 1988The Management of Innovation in High-technology Small Firms: Innovation and Regional Development in Britain and the United States (Pinter, London)
87.
OECD, 1994, “Main definitions and conventions for the measurement of research and experimental development (R&D)—a summary of the Frascati Manual 1993” GD(94)84 (OECD, Paris)
88.
OECD, 2001Innovative Clusters—Drivers of National Innovation Systems (OECD, Paris)
89.
OinasP, 2000, “Activity-specificity in organizational learning: implications for analyzing the role of proximity”Geo Journal49363–372
90.
OinasPMaleckiE J, 1999, “Spatial innovation systems”, in Making Connections Eds MaleckiEOinasP (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 7–33
91.
ParkS O, 1996, “Networks and embeddedness in the dynamic types of new industrial districts”Progress in Human Geography20476–493
92.
PavittKPatelP, 1999, “Global corporations and national systems of innovation: who dominates whom?”, in Innovation Policy in a Global Economy Eds ArchibugiDHowellsJMichieJ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 94–119
93.
PhelpsN AFullerC, 2000, “Multinationals, intracorporate competition, and regional development”Economic Geography76224–243
94.
PioreM JSabelC F, 1984The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York)
95.
PorterM E, 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press, New York)
96.
PorterM E, 2000, “Location, competition, and economic development: local clusters in a global economy”Economic Development Quarterly1415–34
97.
PrahaladC KHamelG, 1990, “The core competence of the corporation”Harvard Business Review68 (May/June) 79–91
RalletATorreA, 1999, “Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy?”Geo Journal49373–380
100.
RothwellR, 1986, “Innovation and re-innovation: a role for the user”Journal of Marketing Management2109–203
101.
RustenG, 2000, “Geography of outsourcing: business service provisions among firms in Norway”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie91122–134
102.
SaxenianA, 1994Regional Advantage (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
103.
ScottA J, 1988New Industrial Spaces: Flexible Production Organization and Regional Development in North America and Europe (Pion, London)
104.
ScottA J, 1992, “The role of large producers in industrial districts: a case study of high technology systems houses in Southern California”Regional Studies26265–275
Segal Quince and Partners, 1985The Cambridge Phenomenon: The Growth of High Technology Industry in a University TownSegal Quince and Partners, Cambridge
107.
SimmieJ, 1998, “Reasons for the development of ‘islands of innovation’: evidence from Hertfordshire”Urban Studies351261–1289
108.
SimmieJHartD, 1999, “Innovation projects and local production networks: a case study of Hertfordshire”European Planning Studies7445–462
109.
StaberU1996, “Accounting for variations in the performance of industrial districts: the case of Baden-Wurttemberg”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20299–316
110.
StaberUMorrisonC, 2000, “The empirical foundations of industrial district theory”, in Innovation, Institutions and Territory Eds HolbrookJ AWolfeD A (McGill–Queen's University Press, Montreal) pp 19–41
111.
Statistics Canada, 1997Industrial Research and Development Cat #88–202 XPB (Statistics Canada, Ottawa)
112.
SteedG, 1988, “The Canada–U.S. Free Trade Agreement: a Canadian science and technology viewpoint”, Science Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
113.
StokmanCDocterJ, 1987, “Innovation in manufacturing medium-size and small enterprise: knowledge breeds prospects”, in Innovation: Adaptation and Growth Eds RothwellRBessantJ (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam) pp 213–236
114.
StorperM, 1999, “The resurgence of regional economics—ten years later”, in The New Industrial Geography Eds BarnesT JGertlerM S (Routledge, London) pp 23–53
115.
StorperMChristophersonS, 1987, “Flexible specialization and regional industrial agglomerations—the case of the United State motion picture industry”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77104–117
116.
StorperMScottA J, 1995, “The wealth of regions—market forces and policy imperatives in local and global context”Futures27505–526
117.
SturgeonT, 1997, “Turnkey production networks in electronics manufacturing: a new American model of industrial organization?”, BRIE working paper 92A, in University of California, Berkeley
118.
Suarez-VillaLKarlssonC, 1996, “The development of Sweden's R&D-intensive electronics industries: exports, outsourcing, and territorial distribution”Environment and Planning A28783–817
119.
Suarez-VillaLWalrodW, 1997, “Operational strategy, R&D and intra-metropolitan clustering in a polycentric structure: the advanced electronics industries of the Los Angeles Basin”Urban Studies341343–1380
120.
The Economist2002a, “High-tech America—down in the valley”, 9 February, pages 54–55
121.
The Economist2002b, “Boston's high-tech suburbs—revenge of the Brahmins”, 9 February, page 55
122.
TreflerD, 1999, “Does Canada need a productivity budget?”Policy Options July–August, 66–71
123.
TurockI, 1993, “Inward investment and local linkages: how deeply embedded is ‘Silicon Glen’?”Regional Studies27401–417
124.
Von HippleE, 1994, “Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation”Management Science40429–39
125.
WalshV, 1996, “Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm”Research Policy25509–529
126.
WilliamsonO, 1985The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, New York)
127.
WolfeD A, 2002, “Social capital and cluster development in learning regions”, in Knowledge, Clusters and Regional Innovation: Economic Development in Canada Eds HolbrookJ AWolfeD A, McGill–Queen's University Press, Montreal) pp 11–38
128.
YeungH W, 2000, “Organizing ‘the firm’ in industrial geography 1: networks, institutions and regional development”Progress in Human Geography24301–315
