NIMBY and regulatory takings are two well-known phenomena associated with land-use change in US cities. I claim that both are manifestations of what economists refer to as a ‘hold-up problem’ and analyze how fast-growing private zoning, namely the ground-lease system and common interest developments, have evolved to respond to these problems. My argument is based on two spatial facts: the consumption of local collective goods is bundled with land and property; property owners have only limited ex post mobility. By comparing five different combinations of property rights and land use control, I submit that private zoning is most efficient in relieving the agency problem in urban land use. Policy implications of NIMBY and equity issues of private zoning are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlchianA ADemsetzH, 1972, “Production, information costs, and economic organization”American Economic Review62777–795.
2.
BartonS ESilvermanC J, 1994Common Interest Communities: Private Governments and the Public Interest (Institute of Governmental Studies Press, Berkeley, CA).
3.
BarzelY, 1982, “Measurement cost and the organization of markets”Journal of Law and Economics2527–48.
4.
BarzelYSassT B, 1990, “The allocation of resources by voting”The Quarterly Journal of Economics150745–771.
5.
BeckmannP, 1973Eco-hysterics and the Technophobes (Golem, Boulder, CO).
6.
BeitoD T, 2002, “The private places of St Louis: Urban infrastructure through private planning”, in The Yoluntary City: Choice, Community, and Civil Society Eds BeitoD TGordonPTabarrokA (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI pp 47–75.
7.
BoudreauxD JHolcombeR G, 2002, “Contractual governments in theory and practice”, in The Voluntary City: Choice, Community and Civil Society Eds BeitoDGordonPTabarrokA (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI pp 289–306.
8.
BrennanGBuchananJ M, 1980The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
9.
BuchananJ M, 1965, “An economic theory of clubs”Economica321–14.
10.
BuchananJ MTollisonRTullockG, 1980Towards a Theory of the Rent-seeking Society (Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX).
11.
CaplinAChanSFreemanCTracyJ, 1997Housing Partnerships: A New Approach to a Market at a Crossroads (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
12.
CoaseR H, 1974, “The lighthouse in economics”Journal of Law and Economics17357–376.
13.
CoaseR H, 1991, “The nature of the firm”, in The Nature of the Firm Eds WilliamsonO EWinterS G (Oxford University Press, New York pp 18–33.
14.
DaviesS, 2002, “Laissez-faire urban planning”, in The Voluntary City: Choice, Community, and Civil Society Eds BeitoD TGordonPTabarrokA (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI pp 18–46.
15.
DengF F, 2002a, “Ground lease-based land use system versus common interest development”Land Economics78(2) 190–206.
16.
DengF F, 2002b, “The political economy of public land leasing in Beijing, China”, in Public Leasehold: International Experiences in Leasing Public Land Eds BourassaS CHongY-H (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA) forthcoming.
17.
DilgerR J, 1992Neighborhood Politics: Residential Community Associations in American Governance (New York University Press, New York).
18.
DiPasqualeDGlaeserE L, 1999, “Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens?”Journal of Urban Economics45354–384.
19.
Directory of Major Malls2000 (MJJTM Publications Corp, Suffen, NY).
20.
DownsA, 1994New Visions for Metropolitan America (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).
21.
EllicksonR C, 1998, “New institutions for old neighborhoods”Duke Law Journal48(1) 75–110.
22.
FischelW A, 1985The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
23.
FischelW A, 1995Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, and Politics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
24.
FischelW A, 1999, “Does the American way of zoning cause the suburbs of metropolitan areas tobe too spread out?”, in Governance and Opportunity in Metropolitan America Eds AltshulerAMorrillWWolmanHMitchellF (National Academy Press, Washington, DC pp 151–191.
25.
FischelW A, 2001The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-use Policies (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
26.
FishbackP V, 1992, “The economics of company housing: Historical perspectives from the coal fields”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization8346–365.
27.
FoldvaryF, 1994Public Goods and Private Communities (Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT).
28.
GarreauJ, 1988Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (Doubleday, New York).
29.
GeorgeH, 1879Progress and Poverty (The Robert Schalkenbach Foundation, New York).
30.
GerrardM B, 1994Whose Backyard, Whose Risk: Fear and Fairness in Toxic and Nuclear Siting (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
31.
GordonPRichardsonH W, 2001, “The geography of transportation and land use”, in Smarter Growth: Market-based Strategies for Land-use Planning in the 21st Century Eds HolcombeR GStaleyS R (Greenwood Press, Westport, CT pp 27–58.
32.
GrossmanS JHartO D, 1986, “The costs and benefits of ownership: A Theory of vertical and lateral integration”Journal of Political Economy94691–719.
33.
HamiltonB W, 1976, “Capitalization of intrajurisdictional differences in local tax prices”American Economic Review66743–753.
34.
HartOMooreJ, 1990, “Property rights and the nature of the firm”Journal of Political Economy981119–1158.
35.
HayekF A, 1945, “The use of knowledge of society”American Economic Review35519–530.
36.
HayekF A, 1988The Fatal Conceit (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
37.
HirschmanA O, 1970Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
38.
HolcombeR G, 1989, “The median voter model in public choice theory”Public Choice61115–125.
39.
HongY-H, 1998, “Transaction costs of allocating increased land value under public leasehold systems: Hong Kong”Urban Studies351577–1595.
40.
InhaberH, 1998Slaying the NIMBY Dragon (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).
41.
LalD, 1998Unintended Consequences: The Impact of Factor Endowments, Culture, and Politics on Long-run Economic Performance (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
42.
LiL H, 1997, “The political economy of the privatisation of the land market in Shanghai”Urban Studies34321–335.
43.
McAvoyG E, 1999Controlling Technocracy: Citizen Rationality and the NIMBY Syndrome (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC).
44.
MacCallumS H, 1970The Art of Community (Institute for Humane Studies, Menlo Park, CA).
45.
MacCallumS H, 1997, “The quickening of social evolution”The Independent Review2287–302.
46.
McKenzieE, 1994Privatopia (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
47.
MieszkowskiPMillsE S, 1993, “The causes of metropolitan suburbanization”Journal of Economic Perspective7(3) 135–147.
48.
NelsonR H, 1977Zoning and Property Rights: An Analysis of the American System of Land-use Regulation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
49.
NelsonR H, 1999, “Privatizing the neighborhood: A Proposal to replace zoning with private collective property rights to existing neighborhood”George Mason Law Review7827–880.
50.
NeutzeM, 2002, “Leasing of publicly owned land in Canberra, Australia”, in Public Leasehold: International Experiences in Leasing Public Land Eds BaurassaS CHongY-H (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA) forthcoming.
51.
NorthD CThomasR P, 1971, “The rise and fall of the manorial system: A Theoretical model”Journal of Economic History31777–803.
52.
PashigianB PGouldE D, 1998, “Internalizing externalities: The pricing of space in shopping malls”Journal of Law and Economics41115–142.
53.
RuskD, 1999Inside Game Outside Game: Winning Strategies for Saving Urban America (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).
54.
SamuelsonP, 1954, “The pure theory of public expenditure”Review of Economics and Statistics36387–389.
55.
ShillerR J, 1993Macro Markets: Creating Institutions for Managing Society's Largest Economic Risks (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
56.
SieganB H, 1972Land Use without Zoning (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).
57.
The Economist2001, “America's new utopias”, 31 August.
58.
TieboutC M, 1956, “A pure theory of local expenditure”Journal of Political Economy64416–424.
59.
TreeseC J, 1999, Community Associations FactbookCommunity Associations Institute, 225 Reinekers Lane, Suite 300, Alexandria, VA 22314.
60.
WilliamsonO E, 1975Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-trust Implications (The Free Press, New York).
61.
WilliamsonO E, 1985The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, New York).
62.
YehA G-O, 1994, “Land leasing and urban planning: Lessons from Hong Kong”Regional Development Dialogue15(2) 3–21.
63.
ZhuJ, 1999The Transition of China's Urban Development: From Plan-controlled to Market-led (Praeger, Westport, CT).
