In this paper I analyze the recently completed struggle to rewrite the city charter of Los Angeles. I read charter reform in the context of an emergent literature on politics in global cities. That literature emphasizes the rising importance in global city politics of new social movements among marginalized populations. It argues that the new movements are increasingly playing a central role in global city politics. In the struggle over charter reform in Los Angeles, however, such movements were conspicuously absent. This finding does not invalidate the literature on new movements in global city politics, but it does point to the need for more detailed research into just what role such movements will play in global city politics. In particular, the case suggests that both formal political structures and electoral politics remain significant features of global city politics. If the new social movements are to have a lasting and transforming impact on global city politics, part of their project will have to engage such formal politics. In this paper I demonstrate the need for more research that investigates how and why new social movements engage the local state and electoral politics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abu-LughodJ, 1999New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's Global Cities (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
2.
BaubockR, 1994Transnational Citizenship: Membership Rights in International Migration (Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT).
3.
BlakelyESnyderM, 1997Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).
4.
BoyteH, 1980The Backyard Revolution: Understanding the New Citizen Movement (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA).
5.
BrennerN, 1998, “Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe”Review of International Political Economy11–37.
6.
BrownM, 1997Replacing Citizenship: AIDS Activism and Radical Democracy (Guilford Press, New York).
7.
BurgosRPulidoL, 1998, “The politics of gender in the Los Angeles Bus Riders' Union/Sindicato de Pasajeros”Capitalism, Nature, Socialism975–84.
8.
CaldeiraT, 1999City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in Sao Paulo (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
9.
CandaeleKDreierP, 2000, “LA's progressive mosaic: Beginning to find its voice”The Nation27124–26.
10.
CastellsM, 1989The Informational City (Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).
11.
ChemerinskyE, 1999, “On LA council, selfish rule”Los Angeles Times 27 May, page B9.
12.
City News Service, 1999, “Charter supporters say revised document could keep city together”City News Service 1 June.
13.
ClarkD, 1996Urban World, Global City (Routledge, New York).
14.
ClarkeSGaileG, 1997, “Local politics in a global era: Thinking locally, acting globally”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science55128–43.
15.
CochraneA, 1989, “Restructuring the state: The case of local government”, in Politics in Transition Eds CochraneAAndersonJ, (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 95–140.
16.
CoxKMairA, 1988, “Locality and community in the politics of local economic development”Annals of the Association of American Geographers78307–325.
17.
CranfordC, 1998, “Gender and citizenship in the restructuring of janitorial work in Los Angeles”Gender Issues1625–40.
18.
DavisM, 1987“Chinatown, part two? The ‘internationalization’ of downtown Los Angeles”New Left Review number 164, 65–86.
19.
DavisM, 1990City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (Vintage Books, New York).
20.
DearMWolchJ, 1987Landscapes of Despair: From Deinstitutionalization to Homelessness (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
21.
DelantyG, 2000, “The resurgence of the city in Europe?”, in Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City Ed. IsinE, (Routledge, New York) pp 79–92.
22.
DouglassMFriedmannJ, (Eds), 1998Cities for Citizens (John Wiley, New York).
23.
EadeJ, (Ed.), 1997Living the Global City: Globalization as a Local Process (Routledge, New York).
24.
FalkR, 2000, “The decline of citizenship in an era of globalization”Citizenship Studies45–18.
25.
FincherRJacobsJ, 1998Cities of Difference (Guilford Press, New York).
26.
FisherR, 1984Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in America (Twayne Publishers, Boston, MA).
27.
FlaniganJ, 1999, “New LA charter would benefit business, region”Los Angeles Times 8 June, page C1.
28.
FlustyS, 1994Building Paranoia: The Proliferation of Interdictory Space and the Erosion of Spatial Justice (Los Angeles Forum for Architecture and Urban Design, West Hollywood, CA).
29.
FriedmannJ, 1986, “The world city hypothesis”Development and Change1769–83.
30.
FriedmannJWolffG, 1982, “World city formation: An agenda for research and action”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research6309–344.
31.
GeronK, 1997, “The local/global context of the Los Angeles hotel-tourism industry”Social Justice2484–103.
32.
GillettR, 1997, “Living wage ordinance: A victory for the working poor”Tikkun1247–49.
33.
HarveyD, 1989aThe Urban Experience (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MA).
34.
HarveyD, 1989b, “From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism”Geografiska Annaler71B3–17.
35.
HermanB, 1999, “For VICA, many issues are far from resolved”Los Angeles Times 7 February, page B17.
36.
HolstonJ, 1998, “Spaces of insurgent citizenship”, in Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural Planning History Ed. SandercockL, (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 35–52.
37.
IsinE, 1996, “Global city-regions and citizenship”, in Local Places in the Age of the Global City Eds KeilRWekerleG, (Black Rose Books, Montreal) pp 21–36.
38.
IsinE, 2000, “Governing cities without government”, in Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City Ed. IsinE, (Routledge, New York) pp 148–168.
39.
IsinEWoodP, 1999Citizenship and Identity (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
40.
JessopB, 1998, “The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development”International Social Science Journal15529–45.
41.
JohnstonRPattieC, 1996, “Local government in governance: The 1994–95 restructuring of local government in England”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20671–696.
42.
KeilR, 1998aLos Angeles: Globalization, Urbanization, and Social Struggles (John Wiley, New York).
43.
KeilR, 1998b, “Globalization makes states: Perspectives of local governance in the age of the world city”Review of International Political Economy5616–646.
44.
KeilRWekerleGBellD, (Eds), 1996Local Places in the Age of the Global City (Black Rose Books, Montreal).
45.
LaguerreM, 1998Diasporic Citizenship: Haitian Americans in Transnational America (St Martin's Press, New York).
46.
LoganJMolotchH, 1987Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
MarstonSTowersG, 1993, “Private spaces and the politics of places: Spatioeconomic restructuring and community organizing in Tucson and El Paso”, in Mobilizing the Community: Local Politics in the Era of the Global City Eds FisherRKlingJ, (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) pp 75–102.
49.
MayerM, 1994, “Post-Fordist city politics”, in Post-Fordism: A Reader Ed. AminA, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 316–337.
50.
MitchellK, 1998, “Reworking democracy: Contemporary immigration and community politics in Vancouver's Chinatown”Political Geography17729–750.
51.
MollenkopfJCastellsM, (Eds), 1991Dual City: Restructuring New York (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).
52.
MouffeC, 1988, “Hegemony and new political subjects: Toward a new concept of democracy”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture Eds NelsonCGrossbergL, (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) pp 89–101.
53.
NewtonJ, 1999, “Riordan urges voters to OK charter reform”Los Angeles Times 27 May, B10.
54.
OrlovR, 1998, “Groups suggest plan for charter”Daily News 31 December, page N3.
55.
PainterJGoodwinM, 1995, “Local governance and concrete research: Investigating the uneven development of regulation”Economy and Society24334–356.
56.
PayneTSkelcherC, 1997, “Explaining less accountability: The growth of local quangos”Public Administration75207–224.
57.
PincetlS, 1994, “Challenges to citizenship: Latino immigrants and political organizing in the Los Angeles area”Environment and Planning A26895–914.
58.
PlattK, 1997, “Chicana strategies for success and survival: Cultural poetics of environmental justice from the mothers of East Los Angeles”Frontiers1848–65.
59.
PulidoL, 1994, “Restructuring and the contraction and expansion of environmental rights in the United States”Environment and Planning A26915–936.
60.
PulidoL, 1996a, “Development of the ‘people of color’ identity in the environmental justice movement of the southwestern United States”Socialist Review26145–181.
61.
PulidoL, 1996bEnvironmentalism and Economic Justice: Two Chicano Struggles in the Southwest (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ).
62.
PulidoL, 2000, “Rethinking environmental racism: White privilege and urban development in Southern California”Annals of the Association of American Geographers9012–40.
63.
PurcellM, 1997, “Ruling Los Angeles: Neighborhood movements, urban regimes, and the production of space in Southern California”Urban Geography18684–704.
64.
PurcellM, 2001a, “Neighborhood activism among homeowners as a politics of space”The Professional Geographer53178–194.
65.
PurcellM, 2001b, “Metropolitan political reorganization and the political economy of urban growth: The case of San Fernando Valley secession”Political Geography20101–121.
66.
RoccoR, 1996, “Latino Los Angeles: Reframing boundaries/borders”, in The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century Eds ScottASojaE, (University of California Press, Los Angeles, CA) pp 365–389.
67.
RoccoR, 1998, “Citizenship, culture and community”, in Latino Cultural Citizenship: Claiming Identity, Space, and Rights Eds FloresWBenmayorR, (Beacon Press, Boston, MA) pp 97–123.
68.
RoccoR, 2000, “Associational rights—claims, civil society and place”, in Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City Ed. IsinE, (Routledge, New York) pp 218–239.
69.
SalmonS, 2001, “The right to the city? Globalism, citizenship, and the struggle over urban space”, paper presented at the 97th Annual Meetings of the Association of American Geographers, New York, February.
70.
SandercockL, 1998Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities (John Wiley, New York).
71.
SassenS, 1991The Global City (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
72.
SassenS, 1994Cities in a Global Economy (Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA).
73.
SassenS, 1996Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization (Columbia University Press, New York).
74.
SassenS, 1998Globalization and Its Discontents (New Press, New York).
75.
SassenS, 1999, “Whose city is it? Globalization and the formation of new claims”, in Cities and Citizenship Ed. HolstonJ, (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 177–194.
76.
SassenS, 2000, “The global city: Strategic site/new frontier”, in Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City (Routledge, New York) pp 48–61.
TaylorP, 1995, “World cities and territorial states: The rise and fall of their mutuality”, in World Cities in a World-system Eds KnoxPTaylorP, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
82.
TurnerB, 1993, “Contemporary problems in the theory of citizenship”, in Citizenship and Social Theory Ed. TurnerB, (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) pp 1–18.
83.
WardK, 2000, “A critique in search of a corpus: Re-visiting governance and re-interpreting urban politics”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series25169–185.
84.
WekerleG, 2000, “Women's rights to the city: Gendered spaces of a pluralistic citizenship”, in Democracy, Citizenship and the Global City Ed. IsinE, (Routledge, New York) pp 203–217.
85.
WolchJ, 1998, “America's new urban policy: Welfare reform and the fate of American cities”Journal of the American Planning Association648–11.
86.
WolchJDearM, 1993Malign Neglect: Homelessness in an American City (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).
