In this paper I explore both the causes and the effects of defining land-cover categories for the mapping of landscapes. Utilizing a participatory remote sensing technique in a case example from Rajasthan, India, I demonstrate that local and expert characterizations of the environment are qualitatively and quantitatively divergent. Satellite imagery, I therefore conclude, is not an impartial tool for the settlement of debates about land cover but is instead the result of prior debates about the character of nature. Moreover, such imagery acts as a force in the transformation of the environment; by fixing certain interpretations of the environment and forcing certain forms of management, technology changes on the land through a process of reverse adaptation. I conclude, therefore, that bureaucratic efforts at mechanical objectivity serve to institutionalize and therefore create measurable, quantifiable, and aggressive land covers through the practice of ecological modernization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AggarwalJ P, 1988, “Role of remote sensing techniques in site identification for afforestation programme in wasteland areas”, in Wasteland Development for Fuelwood and Fodder Production Ed. MaithanaG P (Forest Research Institute and Colleges, Dehra Dun) pp 11–13.
2.
Al-HumaidA IWarragM O A, 1998, “Allelopathic effects of mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) foliage on seed germination and seedling growth of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)”Journal of Arid Environments38237–243.
3.
BarnesT JDuncanJ S, 1992, “Introduction: Writing worlds”, in Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text, and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape Eds BarnesT JDuncanJ S (Routledge, New York) pp 1–17.
4.
BeethamD, 1996Bureaucracy (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
5.
BinnsT, 1990, “Is desertification a myth?”Geography75106–113.
6.
BowkerG CStarS L, 2000Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
7.
BraraR, 1992, “Are grazing lands wastelands? Some evidence from Rajasthan”Economic and Political Weekly 22 February, pp 411–418.
8.
CarstensenL W, 1987, “A measure of similarity for cellular maps”The American Cartographer14345–358.
9.
CAZRI, 1998, “Inventory of geographical distribution of arid wastelands and testing of existing technologies in participatory mode”, Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur.
10.
CorbridgeSJewittS, 1997, “From forest struggles to forest citizens? Joint forest management in the unquiet woods of India's Jarkhand”Environment and Planning A292145–2164.
11.
DasR J, 1998, “The social and spatial character of the Indian state”Political Geography17787–808.
12.
DassH CHarshL NShankarnarayanaK A, 1988, “Techniques for wasteland afforestation of arid areas in Rajasthan”, in Wasteland Development for Fuelwood and Fodder Production Ed. MaithanaG P (Forest Research Institute and College, Dehra Dun) pp 265–275.
13.
DouglasM, 1986How Institutions Think (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY).
14.
DoveM, 1994, “The existential status of the Pakistani farmer: Studying official constructions of social reality”Ethnology33331–351.
15.
DoveM, 1995, “The theory of social forestry intervention: The state of the art in Asia”Agroforestry Systems30315–340.
16.
EastmanRMcKendryJFulkM, 1991Change and Time Series Analysis (UNITAR, Geneva).
17.
EllenR, 1982Environment, Subsistence and System: The Ecology of Small Scale Social Formations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
18.
FairheadJLeachM, 1998Reframing Deforestation: Global Analysis and Local Realities: Studies in West Africa (Routledge, New York).
19.
GadgilMGuhaR, 1992This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India (Oxford University Press, New Delhi).
20.
GadgilMGuhaR, 1995Ecology and Equity: The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India (Routledge, London).
21.
Government of India Ministry of Environment and Forests, 1990Developing India's Wastelands (Government of India, New Delhi).
22.
HajerM A, 1997The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
23.
HarrisTWeinerD, 1998, “Empowerment, marginalization, and ‘community-integrated’ GIS”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25(2) 67–76.
24.
HarveyD, 1996Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).
25.
HaysS P, 1987, “The politics of environmental administration”, in New American States: Bureaucracies and Policies since World War II Ed. GalambosL (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 21–53.
26.
HockingD (Ed.), 1993Trees for Drylands (IBH Publishing, New Delhi).
27.
Hoeschele, 2000, “Geographic information engineering and social ground truth in Attappadi, Kerala State, India”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90293–321.
28.
HoojaB, 1984, “Rajasthan 2000 AD and the challenges of land management”, in Resource Management in Drylands Eds MenschingH GSharmaR C (Rajesh Publications, New Delhi) pp 237–254.
29.
JewittS, 1995, “Europe's ‘others’? Forestry policy and practices in colonial and postcolonial India”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1367–90.
30.
KeilRGrahamJ, 1998, “Reasserting nature: Constructing urban environments after Fordism”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium Eds BraunBCastreeN (Routledge, New York) pp 100–125.
31.
KulaW, 1986Measures and Men (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
32.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
33.
LillesandT MKieferR W, 1994Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation (John Wiley, New York).
34.
LivermanDMoranERindfussRSternE (Eds), 1998People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).
35.
LukeT W, 1999, “Eco-manageralism: Environmental studies as a power knowledge formation”, in Living with Nature: Environmental Politics as Cultural Discourse Eds FischerFHajerM A (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 103–120.
36.
MuthanaK D, 1988, “Afforestation of arid zones wastelands for fuelwood and fodder production”, in Wasteland Development for Fuelwood and Fodder Production Ed. MaithanaG P (Forest Research Institute and Colleges, Dehra Dun) pp 40–42.
37.
NoorMSalamUKhanM A, 1995, “Allelopathic effects of Prosopis juliflora Swartz”Journal of Arid Environments31(1) 83–90.
38.
NorheimR, 1999, “How institutional cultures affect results: comparing two old-growth forest mapping projects”, International Conference on Geographic Information and Society, June, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; abstract available from http://www.geog.umn.edu/gisoc99/gisoc99.html.
39.
OttLLarsonR FMendenhallW, 1983Statistics: A Tool for the Social Sciences (Duxbury Press, Boston, MA).
40.
PelusoN, 1995, “Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia.”Antipode27383–388.
41.
PorterT M, 1995Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
42.
Rajputana-Gazetteers, 1908The Western Rajputana States Residency and Bikaner (Vintage Books, Gurgaor).
43.
RanganH, 1997, “Indian environmentalism and the question of the state: Problems and prospects for sustainable development”Environment and Planning A292129–2143.
44.
RichardsJ A, 1993Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction (Springer, Berlin).
45.
RobbinsP, 1998, “Paper forests: Imagining and deploying exogenous ecologies in arid India”Geoforum2969–86.
46.
RobbinsP, 2000, “The practical politics of knowing: State environmental knowledge and local political economy”Economic Geography76(2) 126–144.
47.
RobbinsP, 2001, “Interrogating land cover categories: Metaphor and method in remote sensing”Cartography and Geographic Information Science forthcoming.
48.
RosenfieldG HFitzpatrick-LinsK, 1986, “A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy”Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing52223–227.
49.
RudolphL IRudolphS H, 1967The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
50.
SargentCBassS, 1992Plantation Politics: Forest Plantations in Development (Earthscan, London).
51.
SingerM, 1972When a Great Tradition Modernizes (Praeger, New York).
52.
SchroederR A, 1999Shady Practices: Agroforestry and Gender Politics in the Gambia (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
53.
SrinivasM N, 1987The Dominant Caste and Other Essays (Oxford University Press, New Delhi).
54.
VereginH, 1995, “Computer innovation and adoption in geography: A Critique of conventional technological models”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ (Guilford Press, New York) pp 88–112.
55.
WeberM, 1978Economy and Society (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
56.
WeinerDWarnerT AHarrisT MLevinR M, 1995, “Apartheid representations in a digital landscape: GIS, remote sensing and local knowledge in Kiepersol, South Africa”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems22(1) 30–44.
57.
WinnerL, 1977Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a Theme in Political Thought (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
