In a context of growing car dependency and suburban sprawl, planners search for ways of intensifying urban development and reducing reliance on the automobile. The creation of planned mixed-use centres intended to become hubs of transit and pedestrian movement within the dispersed suburban environment represents one such intensification strategy. I investigate three suburban mixed-use centres in the Greater Toronto Area, selected for their advanced level of development, and identify the planning rationales and objectives that have led to their creation. To verify the extent to which they meet their intensification goal, I monitor the three selected centres' level of development, modal split, land-use pattern, inner synergy, and inner movements. Findings are mixed. If the suburban centres have been successful in attracting development and attaining levels of transit use, pedestrian movement and inner synergy exceeding those of the typical suburban area, they are not as distinct from the remainder of the suburb as intended and thus fall short from their planning objectives. I conclude that a strategy combining the creation of nodes (such as suburban mixed-use centres) with high-density, transit-oriented corridors within the suburban environment would be more effective in bringing intensification to this portion of the metropolitan region.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderCNeisHAnninouAKingI, 1987A New Theory of Urban Design (Oxford University Press, New York).
2.
APA, 1982Designing Effective Pedestrian Improvements in Business Districts (Chicago, Planning Advisory Series Report 368), American Planning Association, Chicago, IL.
3.
BLG and MMM, 1994The Flexible Region: Regional Structure Strategy, Region of Peel Official Plan, Final ReportBerridge, Lewinberg Greenberg and Marshall Macklin Monaghan, 111 Queen Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5C 1S2.
4.
BoarnetM GSarmientoS, 1998, “Can land-use policy really affect travel behavior: A Study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics”Urban Studies351155–1169.
5.
BourneL S, 1991, “Recycling urban systems and metropolitan areas: A Geographical agenda for the 1990s and beyond”Economic Geography67185–209.
6.
BuntingTFilionP, 1996, “The dispersed city: Its spatial and temporal dynamics”, in The Dynamics of the Dispersed City; Geographic and Planning Perspectives on Waterloo Region Eds FilionPBuntingTCurtisK, Department of Geography Publication Series 47, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, pp 9–54.
7.
BurkeS, 1996, “Edge cities: A Case study evaluation of the usefulness of the nodal concept as a regional planning strategy for the Greater Toronto Area”, unpublished masters thesis, School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario.
8.
CerveroR, 1986Suburban Gridlock Center for Urban Policy Research (Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ).
9.
CerveroR, 1989America's Suburban Centres: The Land Use — Transportation Link (Unwin Hyman, London).
10.
CerveroR, 1996, “Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey”Transportation Research A30361–377.
11.
CerveroRWuK-L, 1997, “Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay Area”Environment and Planning A29865–886.
12.
City of Mississauga, 1994aCity Centre Secondary Plan: Official Plan Amendment 90 City of Mississauga, Planning and Building Department, 300 City Centre Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L5B 3C1.
13.
City of Mississauga, 1994bUrban Design Vision: Mississauga City CentreCity of Mississauga, Planning and Building Department, 300 City Centre Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L5B 3C1.
14.
City of Mississauga, 19991997 Employment Profile ReportCity of Mississauga, Planning and Building Department, 300 City Centre Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L5B 3C1.
15.
City of Mississauga, 2000Mississauga Development Profile March, City of Mississauga, Planning and Building Department, 300 City Centre Drive, Mississauga, Ontario L5B 3C1.
16.
City of North York, 1991City of North York Official PlanCity of North York, 5100 Yonge Street, North York, Ontario M2N 5V7.
17.
City of North York, 1994Downtown and Uptown: Official Plan ConsolidationCity of North York, 5100 Yonge Street, North York, Ontario M2N 5V7.
18.
City of North York, 1995aCity Centre Population Monitoring Report, 1994City of North York, 5100 Yonge Street, North York, Ontario M2N 5V7.
19.
City of North York, 1995bCity Centre Monitoring Report: 1992–1993—Traffic, Transit, Development City of Scarborough, Planning and Buildings, Works and Environment Departments, 150 Borough Drive, Scarborough, Ontario M1P 4N7.
20.
City of Scarborough, 1996Scarborough Official Plan (Official Consolidation)City of Scarborough, 150 Borough Drive, Scarborough, Ontario M1P 4N7.
21.
City of Toronto, 1976Official Plan City of Toronto, Planning and Development Department, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2.
22.
City of Toronto, 1993Official Plan Part 1: Cityplan City of Toronto, Planning and Development Department100 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2.
23.
CodeW R, 1983, “The strength of the centre: Downtown offices and metropolitan decentralization policy in Toronto”Environment and Planning A151361–1380.
24.
FilionP, 2000, “Balancing concentration and dispersion? Public policy and urban structure in Toronto”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18163–189.
25.
FrancisM, 1984, “Mapping downtown activity”Journal of Architectural and Planning Research121–35.
26.
FultonW, 1996, “Are edge cities losing their edge”Planning65(5) 4–7.
27.
GadG, 1979, “Face-to-face linkages and office decentralization potentials: A Study of Toronto”, in Spatial Patterns of Office Growth and Location Ed. DanielsP W (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 277–323.
28.
GadG, 1985, “Office location dynamics in Toronto: Suburbanization and central district specialization”Urban Geography6331–351.
29.
GarreauJ, 1991Edge City: Life on the New Frontier (Doubleday, New York).
30.
GehlJ, 1987Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York).
31.
Greater Toronto Area Task Force, 1996Greater Toronto: Report of the Greater Toronto Area Task Force (Queen's Printer for Ontario, Toronto).
32.
HainesV A, 1986, “Energy and urban form: A Human ecological critique”Urban Affairs Quarterly21337–353.
33.
HandyS L, 1992, “Regional versus local accessibility: Neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel”Built Environment18253–267.
34.
HandyS L, 1996, “Urban form and pedestrian choices: Study of Austin neighborhoods”Transportation Research Record number 1552, 135–144.
35.
HartshornT A, 1992Interpreting the City: An Urban Geography2nd editionJohn Wiley, New York).
36.
HartshornT AMullerP O, 1989, “Suburban downtowns and the transformation of metropolitan Atlanta's business landscape”Urban Geography10375–395.
37.
Henson Consulting Ltd and the Coopers and Lybrand Consulting Group, 1993The Outlook for Population and Employment in the Greater Toronto AreaGreater Toronto Co-ordinating Committee, 10 Bay Street, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2R8.
38.
IBI Group, 1990Greater Toronto Area Urban Structure Concepts Study; Background Report No. 1, Description of Urban Structure ConceptsIBI Group, 240 Richmond West, Toronto, Ontario M5V 1V6.
39.
JacobsJ, 1961The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Random House, New York).
40.
LewisP F, 1993, “Suburban activity centers as public policy”, WP 93–1, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center of Domestic and Comparative Policy Studies, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
41.
MatthewM R, 1992, “Office buildings in office parks and suburban downtowns”Canadian Journal of Urban Research139–57.
42.
MatthewM R, 1993a, “The suburbanization of Toronto offices”The Canadian Geographer37293–306.
43.
MatthewM R, 1993bCase Studies of Some Suburban Centres in TorontoInstitute of Urban Studies, The University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
44.
MatthewM R, 1996, “Another tale of two (or three) cities”, paper given at the Canadian Association of Geographers' Annual ConferenceSaskatoon, Saskatchewan.
45.
Metro Toronto, 1980Official Plan for the Urban StructureThe Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, 55 John Street, Toronto, Ontario M5V 3C6.
46.
Metro Toronto, 1992Office Space and Employment Characteristics: Metropolitan Toronto and the Greater Toronto AreaThe Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, 55 John Street, Toronto, Ontario M5V 3C6.
47.
Metro Toronto, 1994The Official Plan of the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto: The Liveable MetropolisThe Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, 55 John Street, Toronto, Ontario M5V 3C6.
48.
Metro Toronto, 1995Key Facts 1995The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, 55 John Street, Toronto, Ontario M5V 3C6.
49.
MillerE JIbrahimA, 1996, “Urban form and transportation energy and efficiency: Preliminary analyses”, paper given at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Regional Science Association, St. Catharines, Ontario; copy available from MillerE J, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
50.
MillerE JIbrahimA, 1998, “Urban form and vehicular travel issues: Empirical findings”Transportation Research Record number 1617, 18–27.
51.
NewmanPKenworthyJ R, 1989Cities and Automobile Dependence: A Sourcebook (Gower, Aldershot, Hants).
52.
OGTA, no date Urban Form: Bringing the Vision into FocusOffice for the Greater Toronto Area, 10 Bay Street, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2R8.
53.
PivoG, 1990, “The net of mixed beads; suburban office in six metropolitan regions”Journal of the American Planning Association56457–469.
54.
PivoG, 1993, “A taxonomy of suburban office clusters: The case of Toronto”Urban Studies3031–49.
55.
PushkarevB SZupanJ M, 1977Public Transport and Land Use Policy (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, ID).
56.
RelphE, 1991, “Suburban downtowns of the Greater Toronto Area”The Canadian Geographer35421–425.
57.
RoweP G, 1991Making a Middle Landscape (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
58.
Royal Commission on the Future of the Toronto Waterfront, 1992Regeneration—Toronto's Waterfront and the Sustainable City: Final Report Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa (Queen's Printer of Ontario, Toronto).
59.
SheerB CPetkovM, 1998, “Edge city morphology; a comparison of commercial centres”Journal of the American Planning Association64298–310.
60.
SobermanR M, 1997The Track Ahead: Organization of the TTC Under the New Amalgamated City of TorontoToronto Transit Commission, 1900 Yonge Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4S 1Z2.
61.
SouthworthM, 1997, “Walkable suburbs? An evaluation of neotraditional communities at the urban edge”Journal of the American Planning Association6328–44.
62.
Statistics Canada, 1987Census Tracts, Toronto: Part 1Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa, Catalogue Number 95–163, Statistics Canada, RH Coats Building, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0T6.
63.
Statistics Canada, 1999Profile of Census Tracts in TorontoMinister of Industry, Ottawa, Catalogue Number 95–206-XPB, Statistics Canada, RH Coats Building, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0T6.
