Self-help housing is clearly an ‘architecture that works’. Owner-occupation is also a highly desired tenure among the Third World urban poor. Governments in most poor countries are encouraging self-help ownership. But what do poor households actually gain through ownership? Unlike the housing of the better off, consolidated self-help housing is seldom sold. If there is a limited market for this kind of property, capital appreciation must be limited and, therefore, the poor are likely to lose out relative to the rich. If the poor do not sell their consolidated self-help homes what do they do with them? Are homes merely to live in or do they have economic functions too? The author attempts to answer some of these questions with the aid of research on consolidated self-help suburbs in Bogotá, Colombia. He broadly concludes that self-help ownership does not offer the same advantages in terms of capital appreciations as does ownership in higher income areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abt Associates Inc., 1982, “Informal housing in Egypt”, mimeo, Abt Associates Inc., Washington, DC
2.
AlonzoA, 1994, “The development of housing finance for the urban poor in the Philippines: The experience of the Home Development Mutual Fund”Cities11398–401
3.
AmisPLloydP (Eds), 1990Housing Africa's Urban Poor (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
4.
ArimahB C, 1997, “The determinants of housing tenure choice in Ibadan, Nigeria”Urban Studies34105–124
5.
BakenR-JNientiedPPeltenburgMZaaijerM, 1991, “Neighbourhood consolidation and economic development of informal settlements”, WP3, Institute of Housing Studies, Rotterdam
6.
BallMMartensMHarloeM, 1986, “Mortgage finance and owner-occupation in Britain and West Germany”Progress in Planning26185–260
7.
BarossPMesaN, 1986, “From land markets to housing markets: The transformation of illegal settlements in Medellin”Habitat International10153–170
8.
BuckleyR M, 1996Housing Finance in Developing Countries (Macmillan, London)
9.
BurgessR, 1982, “Self-help housing advocacy: A curious form of radicalism. A critique of the work of John F C Turner”, in Self-help Housing: A Critique Ed. WardP M (Mansell, London) pp 56–98
10.
CENAC, 1997aElmercado de edificaciones en Neiva (The Market for Buildings in Neiva)Centro de la Constructión y el Desarrollo Urbano y Regional, Bogotá
11.
CENAC, 1997bEl mercado de edificaciones en Popayán (The Market for Buildings in Popayán)Centro de la Construcción y el Desarrollo Urbano y Regional, Bogotá
12.
ClarkW A VOnakaJ L, 1983, “Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility”Urban Studies2047–57
13.
ConwayDBrownJ, 1980, “Intraurban relocation and structure: Low-income migrants in Latin America and the Caribbean”Latin American Research Review1595–125
14.
CurticeJ, 1991, “House and home”, in British Social Attitudes Eds JowellRBrookLTaylorB (Dartmouth, Aldershot, Hants) pp 98–107
15.
DAPD, 1996Estadísticas Santa Fe de Bogotá DC (Statistics: Santa Fe de Bogotá)Departamento Administrativo de Planeación Distrital, Bogotá
16.
DANE, 1996Censo de Poblacióny ViviendaDepartamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, Bogotá
17.
DattaK, 1996, “The organization and performance of a low income rental market: The case of Gaborone, Botswana”Cities13237–245
18.
DoebeleW, 1975, “The private market and low-income urbanization in developing countries: The ‘pirate’ subdivision of Bogotá”, discussion paper D75–11, Department of City and Regional Planning, Harvard University
19.
DolingJ, 1976, “The family life cycle and housing choice”Urban Studies1355–58
20.
EdelMSclarE DLuriaD, 1984Shaky Palaces: Home Ownership and Social Mobility in Boston's Suburbanization (Columbia University Press, New York)
21.
ForestRMurieA, 1994, “Home ownership in recession”Housing Studies955–74
22.
GilbertA G, 1981, “Pirates and invaders: Land acquisition in urban Colombia and Venezuela”World Development9657–678
23.
GilbertA G, 1997, “On subsidies and homeownership: Colombian housing policy during the 1990s”Third World Planning Review1951–70
24.
GilbertA G, 1998aThe Latin American City (Latin America Bureau, London)
25.
GilbertA G, 1998b, “Market efficiency and the secondary housing market in third world cities”, final report to Department for International Development, 94 Victoria Street, London SW1E 5JL
26.
GilbertA GHealeyP, 1985Political Economy of Land: Urban Development in an Oil Economy (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
27.
GilbertA GVarleyA, 1991Landlord and Tenant: Housing the Poor in Urban Mexico (Routledge, London)
28.
GilbertA GWardP M, 1982, “Residential movement among the poor: The constraints on Latin American urban mobility”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series7129–149
29.
GilbertA GCamachoO OCoulombRNecocheaA, 1993In Search of a Home: Rental and Shared Housing in Latin America (UCL Press, London)
30.
GoughK, 1998, “House for sale? The self-help housing market in Pereira, Colombia”Housing Studies13149–160
31.
HamerA M, 1982, “Los mitos y realidades de la construcción de vivienda suplementaria” (Myths and realities about the construction of supplementary housing)Revista de la Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá45–469–81
32.
HarmsH, 1982, “Historical perspectives on the practice and purpose of self-help housing”, in Self-help Housing: A Critique Ed. WardP M (Mansell, London) pp 15–55
33.
HoffmanM LWalkerCStruykR JNelsonK, 1991, “Rental housing in urban Indonesia”Habitat International15181–206
34.
JohnsonT EJnr, 1987, “Upward filtering of housing stock: A study of upward filtering of housing stock as a consequence of informal sector upgrading in developing countries”Habitat International11173–190
35.
KumarS, 1996, “Landlordism in Third World urban low-income settlements: A case for further research”Urban Studies33753–782
36.
LongL, 1992, “Changing residence: Comparative perspectives on its relationship to age, sex and marital status”Population Studies46141–158
37.
McLavertyPYipN M, 1993, “The preference for owner-occupation”Environment and Planning A251559–1572
MohanR, 1994Understanding the Developing Metropolis: Lessons from the City Study of Bogotá and Cali, Colombia (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
41.
Molina L, and others, 1993El futuro de la capital: Estudio prospectivo de vivienda (The future of the capital: Overview of housing) (Misión Bogotá Siglo XXI, Bogotá)
42.
MurieANinerPWatsonC, 1976Housing Policy and the Housing System (Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
43.
NIUA, 1989, “Rental housing in India: An overview”, Research Study Series No.31, National Institute of Urban Affairs, New Delhi
44.
OguV I, 1996/7, “Enabling strategies and sustainable infrastructure development: Focus on Benin City, Nigeria”Regional Development Strategies3199–217
45.
OkpalaD C I, 1994, “Financing housing in developing countries: A review of the pitfalls and potentials in the development of formal housing finance systems”Urban Studies311571–1586
46.
OPCS, 1995, “Living in Britain: Preliminary results from the 1994 General Household Survey”Office of Population Census and Surveys (The Stationery Office, London)
47.
PayneG, 1989Informal Housing and Land Subdivisions in Third World Cities: A Review of the LiteratureCentre for Environmental and Development Planning, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford
48.
Pérez-PreciadoA, 1997Perfil ambiental de Santafé de Bogotá (Environmental profile of Santafé de Bogotá) (Corporación Misión Siglo XXI, Bogotá)
49.
PersaudT, 1992, “Housing delivery system and the urban poor: A comparison among six Latin American countries”, report 23, Latin America and the Caribbean Technical Department Regional Studies Program, World Bank, Washington, DC
50.
RakodiC, 1992, “Housing markets in Third World cities: Research and policy into the 1990s”World Development2039–55
51.
RakodiC, 1995, “Housing finance for lower income urban households in Zimbabwe”Housing Studies10199–227
52.
RenaudB, 1984, “Housing and financial institutions in developing countries: An overview” WP658, World Bank, Washington, DC
53.
RichardsB, 1994A Home of One's Own: Housing Policy Under Neoliberalism in Chile unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Geography, University College London
54.
RichardsB, 1995, “Poverty and housing in Chile: The development of a neo-liberal welfare state”Habitat International19515–527
55.
RobbenP J M, 1987, “Measurement of population dynamics following squatter settlement improvement in Ashok Nagor, Madras”, in Shelter Upgrading for the Urban Poor: Evaluation of Third World Experience Eds SkinnerR JTaylorJ LWegelenE A (Institute of Housing Studies, Rotterdam) pp 87–106
56.
RoheW MStewartL S, 1996, “Homeownership and neighbourhood stability”Housing Policy Debate737–81
57.
RossiP HWeberE, 1996, “The social benefits of homeownership: Empirical evidence from national surveys”Housing Policy Debate71–35
58.
SalmenL F, 1987Listen to the People (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
59.
SaundersP, 1990A Nation of Home Owners (Unwin Hyman, London)
60.
SkinnerR JRodellM J (Eds), 1983People, Poverty and Shelter: Problems of Self-help Housing in the Third World (Methuen, London)
61.
SkinnerR JTaylorJ LWegelinE A (Eds), 1987Shelter Upgrading for the Urban Poor: Evaluation of Third World Experience (Institute of Housing Studies, Rotterdam)
62.
SmithN1987, “Review of shaky palaces”Environment and Planning A19127–128
63.
StruykR J, 1989, “Who gets formal housing finance in Jordan?”Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies123–36
64.
TippleA GWillisK G, 1991, “Tenure choice in a West African city”Third World Planning Review1327–46
65.
TippleA GKorboeDGarrodG, 1997, “Income and wealth in house ownership studies in urban Ghana”Housing Studies12111–126
66.
TomlinsonM, 1995, “The first million is the hardest: Will the consensus on housing endure?”, Policy Review Series 8, Centre for Policy Studies, London
67.
TurnerJ F C, 1967, “Barriers and channels for housing development in modernizing countries”Journal of the American Institute of Planners33167–181
68.
TurnerJ F C, 1968a, “The squatter settlement: An architecture that works”Architectural Design38357–360
69.
TurnerJ F C, 1968b, “Housing priorities, settlement patterns, and urban developing in modernizing countries”Journal of the American Institute of Planners34354–363
70.
UNCHS, 1989Strategies for Low-income Shelter and Services Development: The Rental-housing OptionUnited Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat), Nairobi
71.
UNCHS, 1993Support Measures to Promote Rental Housing for Low-income GroupsUnited Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat), Nairobi
72.
UNCHS, 1996An Urbanising World: Global Report on Human Settlements 1996United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
73.
UNDP, 1991Cities, People and Poverty: Urban Development Cooperation in the 1990sDevelopment Program, United Nations, New York
74.
Van der LindenJ, 1994, “Where do we go from here?”Third World Planning Review16223–230
75.
Van LindertP, 1991, “Moving up or staying down? Migrant—native differential mobility in La Paz”Urban Studies28433–463
76.
VernezG, 1973, “The residential movements of low-income families: The case of Bogota, Colombia”, Rand Institute, New York
77.
WardP M (Ed.), 1982Self-help Housing: A Critique (Mansell, London)
78.
World Bank, 1980Shelter (World Bank, Washington, DC)
79.
World Bank, 1991Urban Policy and Economic Development: An Agenda for the 1990s (World Bank, Washington, DC)
80.
World Bank, 1992, “Housing indicators program—extensive survey”, mimeo, World Bank, Washington, DC
81.
World Bank, 1993Housing: Enabling Markets to Work (World Bank, Washington, DC)
