Traditionally, agrarian beliefs have been assigned an important place in studies of the formative processes of agricultural policymaking. However, such work has tended to privilege these beliefs with a passive, conditioning, or reactive role in decisionmaking and decision taking. In this paper, we show that these deeply engrained notions also provide the basis for articulating more complex proactive strategies, aimed at advancing agricultural interests. We demonstrate how widely held agrarian beliefs in British society, relating to ‘trusteeship’ by farming of the natural environment, have been deployed by policy élites in the British Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) as a means of legitimising a suite of agri-environment policies to sectoral constituencies and the general public which are strongly supportive of both bureaucratic and producer group ambitions. We examine the impact of these beliefs on the formation by MAFF of the British negotiating position towards the European Union's ‘agri-environment’ regulation, EU 2078/92.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldockD MLoweP D, 1996, “The development of European agri-environment policy”, in The European Experience of Policies for the Agricultural Environment Ed. WhitbyM, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon OX10 8DE, pp 8–25
2.
BaptistaF O, 1995, “Agriculture, rural society and the land question in Portugal”Sociologia Ruralis35(3/4) 309–321
3.
BensonJ K, 1975, “The interorganizational network as a political economy”Administrative Science Quarterly20(1) 229–249
4.
BensonJ K, 1980, “A framework for policy analysis”, in Interorganizational Coordination: Theory, Research, and Implementation Eds RogersD LWhettenD A, (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA) pp 137–176
5.
Boehmer-ChristiansenS, 1994, “Politics and environmental management”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management37(1) 69–85
6.
BullerH, 1992, “Agricultural change and the environment in Western Europe”, in Agricultural Change, Environment and Economy Ed. HoggartK, (Mansell, London) pp 68–88
7.
CEC, 1990, “Commission proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on the introduction and the maintenance of agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside COM (90) 366”Official Journal number C267 (Commission of the European Economic Communities, Brussels) 23 October, pp 11–14
8.
CEC, 1991, “Commission proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside COM (91) 415 final”Official Journal number C300 (Commission of the European Economic Communities, Brussels) 21 November, pp 7–11
9.
CEC, 1992, “Council Regulation (EEC) Number 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside”Official Journal L215 (Commission of the European Economic Communities, Brussels) 30 July, pp 85–90
10.
ClarkJ R AJonesAPotterCLobleyM, 1997, “Conceptualising the evolution of the European Union's agri-environment policy: A discourse approach”Environment and Planning A291869–1885
11.
ClokePMacLaughlinB, 1989, “Politics of the alternative land use and rural economy (ALURE) proposals in the UK: Crossroads or blind alley?”Land Use Policy6235–250
12.
CoxGLoweP D, 1983, “A battle not the war: The politics of the Wildlife and Countryside Act”, in Countryside Planning Yearbook 4 Ed. GilgA, (Geo Books, Norwich) pp 48–76
13.
CoxGLoweP DWinterM, 1985, “Land use conflict after the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981: The role of the Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group”Journal of Rural Studies1173–183
14.
CoxGLoweP DWinterM, 1988, “Private rights and public responsibilities: The prospects for agricultural and environmental controls”Journal of Rural Studies4323–338
15.
CoxGLoweP DWinterM, 1991The Voluntary Principle in Conservation: The Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group (Packard, Chichester, Sussex)
16.
DavidsonJ, 1978, “Practical conservation and land use management: The case of modern agriculture”, in Conservation and Agriculture Ed. HawkesJ G, (Gerald Duckworth, London) pp 95–100
17.
DeverreC, 1995, “Social implications of agro-environmental policy in France and Europe”Sociologia Ruralis35227–247
18.
FriedrichP, 1989, “Language, ideology and political economy”American Anthropologist91295–312
19.
GrantW, 1993, “Transnational companies and environmental policy making: The trend of globalisation”, in European Integration and Environmental Policy Eds LiefferinkJ DLoweP DMolA P J, (Belhaven Press, London) pp 59–74
20.
Grove-WhiteR, 1987, “Putting on the pressure”The Countryman92(2) 22–28
21.
HagedornK, 1985, “CAP reform and agricultural economics: A dialogue of the deaf?”, in Can the CAP be Reformed? Ed. PelkmansJ, (Institut Európeen d'Administration Publique, Paris) pp 13–51
22.
HoggartKBullerHBlackR, 1995Rural Europe, Identity and Change (Edward Arnold, Sevenoaks, Kent)
23.
JonesA, 1986The Role of Institutions in Agricultural Despecialisation in Languedoc-Roussillon PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Leicester, England
24.
JonesAClarkJ R A, 1998, “The ‘agri-environment’ Regulation EU 2078/92: The role of the European Commission in policy shaping and setting”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1651–68
LoweP DBodiguelM, (Eds), 1990Rural Studies in Britain and France (Belhaven Press, London)
27.
LoweP DWinterM, 1987, “Alternative perspectives on the alternative land-use debate”, Merlewood Research and Development Paper number 112, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-over-Sands, Cumbria LA11 6JU
28.
LoweP DCoxGMacEwanMO'RiordanTWinterM, 1986Countryside Conflicts: The Politics of Farming, Forestry and Conservation (Gower and Maurice Temple Smith, Aldershot, Hants)
29.
LowenthalD, 1991, “British national identity and the English landscape”Rural History2205–230
30.
LowndesV, 1996, “Varieties of new institutionalism: A critical appraisal”Public Administration74181–197
MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2HH 1988, “Three reasons why agriculture is important to city dwellers”, MAFF News Release 200/88, 28 May
33.
MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2HH 1989a, “Ministerial speech to Oxford Farmers Conference”, MAFF News Release unnumbered, 4 January
34.
MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2HH 1989b, “Environmental protection should be science based”, MAFF News Release 167/89, 18 April
35.
MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2HH 1990, “Conservation and farming can work together”, MAFF News Release 279/90, 2 August
36.
MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2HH 1992, “Environmental protection is not an add-on extra—Minister”, MAFF News Release 290/92, 7 September
37.
MajoneG, 1992, “Ideas, interests and policy change”, EUI WP-91/9, Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Florence, Italy
38.
MarsdenT, 1993Constructing the Countryside (UCL Press, London)
39.
MarshDRhodesR A W, 1992Policy Networks in British Government (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
40.
MazeySRichardsonJ J, (Eds), 1993Lobbying in the European Community (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
41.
MingayG E, 1981The Victorian Countrysidetwo volumes (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
42.
O'RiordanT, 1985, “Halvergate: The politics of policy change”, in Countryside Planning Yearbook 1985 Ed. GilgA, (Geo Books, Norwich) pp 101–106
43.
PaarlbergD, 1980Farm and Food Policy: Issues for the 1980s (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE)
44.
PlaschkeH, 1994, “National economic cultures and economic integration”, in National Cultures and European Integration: Exploratory Essays on Cultural Diversity and Common Policies Ed. ZetterholmS, (Berg, Providence, RI) pp 113–143
45.
SabatierP, 1988, “An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein”Policy Sciences21129–168
46.
ScheinE H, 1996, “Culture: The missing concept in organization studies”Administrative Science Quarterly41229–240
47.
SchlagerEBlomquistW, 1996, “A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process”Political Research Quarterly49651–672
48.
SmithM J, 1990The Politics of Agricultural Support in Britain: The Development of the Agricultural Policy Community (Dartmouth, Aldershot, Hants)
49.
StapletonR G, 1935The Land (Faber and Faber, London)
50.
StreetA G, 1937Farming England (Batsford, London)
51.
SwansonL, 1992, “Agro-environmentalism: The political economy of soil erosion in the USA”, in The Greening of Rural Policy. International Perspectives Ed. HarperS, (Belhaven Press, London) pp 101–118
52.
SwidlerA, 1986, “Culture in action: Symbols and strategies”American Sociological Review51273–286
53.
VogelerI, 1981The Myth of the Family Farm: Agribusiness Dominance of US Agriculture (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
WilksS, 1990, “The embodiment of industrial culture in bureaucracy and management”, in Capitalism in Contrasting Cultures Eds CleggS RReddingG S, (De Gruyter, Berlin)
56.
WintersL A, 1986, “The political economy of the agricultural policies of industrialised countries”European Review of Agricultural Economics14285–304
