The globalisation of the world's economy and the creation of new flexible regimes of accumulation are necessarily generating new forms of corporate organisation. Increasingly, new economies and trade in mutable resources such as information, global finance, and genetic material are controlled not by conventional corporate elites but rather by constellations of disparate but highly influential actors linked together across an equally mutable regulatory landscape. With the aid of my recent research into the elite which controls global trade in genetic material as a case study, I begin to deconstruct conventional notions of what constitutes a corporate elite, positing in its place an alternative construction in which they are understood not as formally constituted, institutionally based entities, but rather as increasingly informal, hybridised, and invisible ‘elite networks’. I then consider some of the methodological issues which confront researchers investigating the constitution and behaviour of these elite networks. In so doing I reflect upon the role which processes such as luck, chance, and intuition play in determining the direction and outcome of research projects. I conclude with a discussion of some of the ethical tensions which surround issues of disclosure, textual representation, and attribution of sources.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AronR, 1988Power, Modernity and Sociology (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos)
2.
BornG, 1995Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez and the Institutionalisation of the Musical Avant-garde (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
3.
BottomoreT, 1993Elites and Society (Routledge, London)
4.
BrennerMBrownJCanterD, (Eds), 1985The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches (Academic Press, London)
5.
CaddesC, 1996Portraits of Success: Impressions of Silicon Valley Pioneers (Tioga Publishers, Palo Alto, CA)
6.
CallonM, 1986, “Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St.Brieuc Bay”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ, (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 196–229
7.
CringelyR, 1996Accidential Empires: How the Boys of Silicon Valley Make their Millions, Battle Foreign Competition and Still Can't get a Date (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
8.
DavisW, 1996One river: Science, Adventure and Hallucinogens in the Amazon Basin (Simon and Schuster, New York)
9.
DelbridgeA, 1992The Macquarie Dictionary (Macquarie University Press, Sydney)
10.
EldersveldS, 1991Political Elites in Modern Societies: Empirical Research and Democratic Theory (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
11.
EnglandK, 1994, “Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality and feminist research”The Professional Geographer4680–89
12.
FieldingJ, 1993, “Qualitative interviewing”, in Researching Social Life Ed. GilbertN, (Sage, London) pp 33–63
13.
GibbonsMLimogesCNowotnyHSchwartzmanSScottPTrowM, 1994The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (Sage, London)
14.
HarawayD, 1989Private Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science (Routledge, New York)
15.
HarveyDHarawayD, 1995, “Nature, politics and possibilities: A debate and discussion with David Harvey and Donna Haraway”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13507–527
16.
HerodA, 1993, “Gender issues in the use of interviewing as a research method”The Professional Geographer45305–317
17.
KellerS, 1968Beyond the Ruling Class: Strategic Elites in Modern Society (Random House, New York)
18.
Knorr-CetinaK, 1983The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
19.
LatourB, 1988The Pasteurization of France (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
20.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York)
21.
MacdonaldS, 1997, “The museum as mirror: Ethnographic reflections”, in After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology Eds JamesWJamesAHocheyJDawsonA, (Routledge, London) pp 161–177
22.
McDowellL, 1992, “Valid games? A response to Erica Schoenberger”The Professional Geographer44212–215
23.
MarcusG, 1995, “Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of a multi-site ethnography”Annual Review of Anthropology2395–114
24.
MarcusGFischerM, 1986Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
25.
MoscaG, 1939The Ruling Class (McGraw-Hill, New York)
26.
OkelyJ, 1997, “Some political consequences of theories of gypsy ethnicity: The place of the intellectual”, in After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology Eds JamesWJamesAHocheyJDawsonA, (Routledge, London) pp 224–244
27.
ParetoV, 1963A Treatise on General Sociology (Dover, New York)
28.
ParryB, 1993, “The United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty: Global laws, nation states and resource management”, WP15, Economic Regional Resources Restructuring Unit, Department of Economics and Geography, The University of Sydney, Sydney
29.
PattonM, 1990Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (Sage, London)
30.
RabinowP, 1996Making P. C.R.: A Story of Biotechnology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
31.
SchoenbergerE, 1991, “The corporate interview as a research method in economic geography”The Professional Geographer43180–190
32.
SchoenbergerE, 1992, “Self-criticism and self-awareness: A reply to Linda McDowell”The Professional Geographer44215–218
33.
SchoenbergerE, 1994, “Corporate strategy and corporate strategists: Power, identity and knowledge within the firm”Environment and Planning A26435–451
34.
SchwartzM, 1987The Structure of Power in America: The Corporate Elite as a Ruling Class (Holmes and Meier, New York)
35.
ShapinS, 1994A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
36.
StanworthPGiddensA, 1974, “An economic elite: A demographic profile of company chairmen”, in Elites and Power in British Society Eds StanworthPGiddensA, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 81–102
37.
StrathernM, 1996, “Potential property: Intellectual rights and property in persons”Social Anthropology4(1) 17–32
38.
ThriftN, 1996, “Knowledge economies: The rise of soft capitalism”, unpublished manuscript, Department of Geography, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS
39.
WarringtonM, 1997, “Reflections on a recently completed Ph.D”Journal of Geography in Higher Education21401–410
40.
WhitleyR, 1974, “The City and Industry: The directors of large companies—their characteristics and commentaries”, in Elites and Power in British Society Eds StanworthPGiddensA, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 65–81
