Investigating the Relationship between Company Competitiveness and Environmental Regulation in European Food Processing: Results of a Matched Firm Comparison
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 1998
Investigating the Relationship between Company Competitiveness and Environmental Regulation in European Food Processing: Results of a Matched Firm Comparison
The authors use a method of matched-plant comparisons between food processing firms in Germany, Italy, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland to investigate the relationship between environmental regulation and company competitiveness across the European Union. Comparative competitiveness was indicated by measures of value-added per employee, physical productivity, export share, and employment growth. The cost of water supply (public or well), effluent treatment (in-plant treatment and/or sewerage system), and disposal of sludge and packaging were also compared. Total environmental costs in Germany, Italy, and Ireland were small: usually less than 1% of turnover. Compared with the Irish firms, German companies had relatively high environmental costs as well as productivity levels. There was, however, a lack of a clear relationship between company competitiveness and the size of regulation costs: in Ireland and Italy environmental costs were similar but German firms had much higher productivity; compared with German counterparts, Italian firms had lower environmental costs but higher productivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaumolWJBlackmanSABWolffEH, 1989Productivity and American Leadership (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
2.
CEC, 1994Panorama of EU Industry 1994 Commission of the European Communities (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)
3.
DalyAHitchensDMWNWagnerK, 1985, “Productivity, machinery and skills in a sample of British and German manufacturing plants”National Institute Economic Review no. 111, 48–62
4.
DertouzousMLLesterRKSolowRM, 1989Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
5.
Economist1995, “A new case for greenery”, 3 June, pages 14–16
6.
Economist1996, “The C-word strikes back”, 1 June, page 86
7.
Financial Times1995, “Time to bury those league tables”, 25 May
8.
GrossmanGMKruegerAB, 1993, “Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement”, in The US—Mexico Free Trade Agreement Ed. GarberP, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 13–56
9.
HitchensDMWNBirnieJE, 1994The Competitiveness of Industry in Ireland (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
10.
HitchensDMWNWagnerKBirnieJE, 1990Closing the Productivity Gap: A Comparison of Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, Britain and Germany (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
11.
HitchensDMWNWagnerKBirnieJE, 1992, “Measuring the contribution of product quality to competitiveness: A note on theory and policy”Economic and Social Review23455–463
12.
HitchensDMWNWagnerKBirnieJE, 1993East German Productivity and the Transition to the Market Economy (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
13.
JaffeABPetersonSRPortneyPRStavinsRN, 1995, “Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us?”Journal of Economic Literature33132–163
14.
KaltJP, 1988, “The impact of domestic environmental regulation policy on US international competitiveness”, in International Competitiveness Eds SpenceMHazardHA, (Harper Row, Cambridge, MA) pp 221–226
15.
KravisIBLipseyRE, 1971Price Competition in World Trade (Columbia University Press, New York)
16.
KrugmanP, 1991The Age of Diminished Expectations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
17.
KrugmanP, 1994, “Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession”Foreign Affairs73(2) 28–44
18.
LawlorJ, 1996, “The use of economic instruments for environmental services in Irish local authorities”ESRI Report (Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin)
19.
MerliAct, 1976, “Norme per la tutela delle acque inquinamento”
20.
OECD, 1989Economic Instruments for Environmental Protection (OECD, Paris)
21.
PorterM, 1990The Competitive Advantage of Nations (The Free Press, New York)
22.
PorterMvan der LindeC, 1995, “Towards a new conception of the environment—competitiveness related”Journal of Economic Perspectives9(4) 97–118
23.
SchottKPickK, 1983, “The effects of price and non-price factors on UK export performance and import penetration”, DP-35, University College London, London
24.
ScottSLawlorJ, 1994, “Waste water services: Charging industry the capital cost”, Policy Research Series, paper number 22 (Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin)
25.
SOEC, Statistical Office of the European Communities (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg) 1981Structure and Activity of Industry 1976
26.
SOEC, Statistical Office of the European Communities (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg) 1984Structure and Activity of Industry 1979/80
27.
SOEC, Statistical Office of the European Communities (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg) 1993Structure and Activity of Industry 1989/90
28.
SprengerR-U, 1996, “Environmental policy and international competitiveness: The case of Germany”, paper presented to Workshop on Environmental Policies and International Competitiveness, Cambridge, 28–29 October; copy available from Paschingerstrasse 5, 81679 München 80
29.
SteedmanHWagnerK, 1987, “A second look at productivity, machinery and skills in Britain and Germany”National Institute Economic Review number 122, 84–95
30.
SteedmanHWagnerK, 1989, “Productivity, machinery and skills: Clothing manufacturing in Britain and Germany”National Institute Economic Review number 128, 40–87
31.
van ArkB, 1994, “Reassessing growth and comparative levels of performance in eastern Europe: The experience of manufacturing in Czechoslovakia and East Germany”, paper given to the Third EACES Conference, Budapest, 8–10 September; copy available from the author, N W Posthumus Institute, Economics Faculty, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen
32.
van ArkB, 1996, “Productivity and competitiveness in manufacturing: A comparison of Europe, Japan and the US”, in International Productivity Differences: Measurement and Explanations Eds WagnerKvan ArkB, (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam) pp 23–52
