In this paper we report findings of interviews with housing benefit claimants whose eligible rent for housing benefit was less than the contractual rent ‘agreed’ with their landlord. Linking into debates about the usefulness of the concept of ‘strategy’ in social analysis, we consider whether the claimants interviewed pursued strategies in coping with the shortfalls in their eligible rent for housing benefit. Though claimants often had difficulty in pursuing ‘strategies' successfully, the research shows that most of those interviewed did try to act strategically. They were not simply the passive victims of circumstances beyond their control.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Audit Commission, 1993Remote Control: The National Administration of Housing Benefit Local Government Report (The Stationery Office, London)
2.
BeckerH, 1960, “Notes on the concept of commitment”America Journal of Sociology6632–40
3.
BerthoudR, 1989, “Social security and the economics of housing”, in The Economics of Social Security Eds DilnotAWalkerI, (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 88–98
4.
BevanMKempPARhodesD, 1995Private Landlords and Housing Benefit Centre for Housing Policy Research Report, University of York, York
5.
CrowG, 1989, “The use of the concept of ‘strategy’ in recent sociological literature”Sociology231–24
6.
CrookTHughesJKempP A, 1995The Supply of Privately Rented HomesJoseph Rowntree Foundation, The Homestead, 40 Water End, York Y03 6LP
7.
de la RochaM G, 1994The Resources of Poverty: Women and Survival in a Mexican City (Blackwell, Oxford)
8.
EdwardsRRibbenJ, 1991, “Meanderings around ‘strategy’: A research note on strategic discourse in the lives of women”Sociology25477–489
9.
DoE, 1994Rent Officer Statistics 1993/1994Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 3EB
10.
FinchJMasonJ, 1993Negotiating Family Responsibilities (Routledge, London)
11.
FindlayLPoynterRWardM, 1996Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Legislation8th edition, Child Poverty Action Group, 1–5 Bath Street, London EC1V 9LB
12.
ForrestRKennettT, 1996, “Coping strategies, housing careers and households with negative equity”Journal of Social Policy25369–394
JordanWJamesSKayHRedleyM, 1992Trapped in Poverty? (Routledge, London)
15.
KempP A, 1992Housing Benefits: An Appraisal (The Stationery Office, London)
16.
KempP AMcLavertyP, 1994, “The determination of eligible rent for housing benefit: The implementation by local authorities of central government policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy12109–122
17.
KempP AMcLavertyP, 1995Private Tenants and Restrictions in Rent for Housing Benefit Centre for Housing Policy Research Report, University of York, York
18.
KempP AOldmanCRuggJWilliamsT, 1994The Effects of Benefit on Housing Decisions Research Report (The Stationery Office, London)
19.
KempsonEBrysonARowlinsonK, 1994Hard Times? How Poor Families Make Ends MeetPolicy Studies Centre, 100 Park Village East, London NW1 3SR
20.
KnightsDMorganG, 1990, “The concept of strategy in sociology: A note of dissent”Sociology24475–483
21.
LilleyP, 1994, “Social security statement”Hansard 30 November
22.
MorganD H J, 1989, “Strategies and sociologists: A comment on Crow”Sociology2325–29
23.
MorrisL, 1994, “Informal aspects of social divisions”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research18112–126
24.
PickvanceCPickvanceK, 1994, “Towards a strategic approach to housing behaviour: A study of young people's housing strategies in South-East England”Sociology28657–677
25.
PickvanceC GPickvanceK, 1995, “The role of family help in the housing decisions of young people”The Sociological Review43123–149
26.
RuggJ, 1996Opening Doors: Helping People on Low Income Secure Private Rented Accommodation Centre for Housing Policy Research Report, University of York, York
27.
SainsburyREardleyT, 1991Housing Benefit Reviews: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Review System in Responding to Claimants Dissatisfied with Housing Benefit Decisions Research Report (The Stationery Office, London)
28.
ShawM, 1990, “Debate on the concept of strategy and social process: Military context and sociological analysis”Sociology24465–473
29.
ThompsonE P, 1978, “The poverty of theory”, in The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays (Merlin Press, London) pp 1–20
