Studies of regionalism in India have tended to concentrate on the secessionist struggles in Kashmir and Punjab, and on centre-State relations within the federal union. An issue which has received far less attention has been that of nonsecessionist regionalism—the various demands for the creation of new smaller States within India. The persistent tendency of the centre has been to view these movements as threatening and divisive and, therefore, with varying degrees of success, to resist and repress them. However, a number of commentators have suggested that smaller States are one way in which India's federal structure could become more equipoised, decentralised, and participatory. In this paper the author examines the recent mass movement for a separate State of Uttarakhand, an area which currently forms the Himalayan part of the State of Uttar Pradesh. Given the limitations of space, she concentrates on one aspect of the movement, namely how protestors have mobilised particular grammars and strategies of resistance in their struggle to persuade the central government (the final arbiter) that their demands for separation from Uttar Pradesh are justified and that the creation of Uttarakhand would benefit both the region and the country, economically, environmentally, and strategically.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkbarM J, 1985India: The Siege Within (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx) Amar Ujala 1994, 18 September
2.
BentallJCorbridgeS E, 1995, “Urban-rural relations, demand politics and the new agrarianism in northwest India: the Bharatiya Kisan Union”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers2127–48
3.
BerremanG D, 1963Hindus of the Himalayas: Ethnography and Change (Oxford University Press, Delhi)
4.
BeteilleA, 1992The Backward Classes in Contemporary India (Oxford University Press, Delhi)
5.
BhattacharyaM, 1989, “Bureaucracy and politics in India”, in The State, Political Processes and Identity: Reflections on Modern India Eds HasanZJhaS NKhanR (Sage, New Delhi) pp 180–190
6.
BirdR M, 1996, “On measuring fiscal centralization and fiscal balance in federal states”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy4389–404
7.
BrassP, 1974Language, Religion and Politics in North India (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
8.
BrassP, 1982, “Pluralism, regionalism and decentralising tendencies in contemporary Indian politics”, in The States of South Asia: Problems of National Integration Eds WilsonA JDaltonD (Hurst, London) pp 223–264
9.
BrassP, 1988, “The Punjab crisis and the unity of India”, in India's Democracy Ed.KohliA (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 169–213
10.
BrassP, 1994The Politics of India Since Independence2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
11.
BreckenridgeC Avan der VeerP (eds.), 1944Orientalism and the Post-Colonial Predicament (Oxford University Press, New Delhi)
12.
CaimanL J, 1995Toward Empowerment: Women and Movement Politics in India (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
13.
ClarkeG E, 1995, “Thinking through nature in highland Nepal”, in Asian Perspectives of Nature: A Critical Approach Eds BrunnOKallandA (Curzon Press, Richmond) pp 88–102
14.
CorbridgeS E, 1993, “Colonialism, post-colonialism and the Third World”, in Political Geography of the Twentieth Century: A Global Analysis Ed.TaylorP (Belhaven Press, London) pp 171–206
15.
CorbridgeS E, 1995, “Federalism, Hindu nationalism and mythologies of governance in modern India”, in Federalism: The Multiethnic Challenge Ed.SmithG E (Longman, Harlow, Essex) pp 101–127
16.
Das GuptaJ, 1988, “Ethnicity, democracy and development in India: Assam in a general perspective”, in India's Democracy: An Analysis of Changing State - Society Relations Ed.KohliA (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 144–168
17.
Economic Times1994, “10 killed in Muzaffanager clashes”, 3 October
18.
Frontline1994, “Mass of mistrust: the Uttarakhand agitation”, 23 September, pp 126–129
19.
GalanterM, 1978, “Who are the OBCs? An introduction to a constitutional puzzle”Economic and Political Weekly 28 October, pp 1812–1828
20.
GalanterM, 1984Competing Equalities: Law and the Backward Classes in India (Oxford University Press, Delhi)
21.
GuhaR, 1989The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance (Oxford University Press, Delhi)
22.
HasanZ, 1989, “Introduction: state and identity in modern India”, in The State, Political Processes and Identity: Reflections on Modern India Eds HasanZJhaS NKhanR (Sage, New Delhi) pp 9–29
23.
HerringR, 1987Land to the Tiller: The Political Economy of Agrarian Reform in South Asia (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
24.
Himachal Times1994a, “Dun Sikhs support Uttarakhand demands”, 2 September
25.
Himachal Times1994b, “Badoni likens Uttarakhand movement to french revolution” 29 September
26.
Himachal Times1994c, “Appeal for support for the Uttarakhand movement”, 8 December
27.
Himachal Times1995, “President urged to intervene in Uttarakhand”, 14 January
28.
Indian Express1994a, Editorial “Shocking attitudes”, 13 October
29.
Indian Express1994b, “Uttarakhandis' no to armed struggle”, 18 October
30.
India Today1995, “Galloping Mandalism”, 15 June, pp 82–83
31.
JalalA, 1995Democracy and Authoritarianism in South Asia: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
32.
JonesS, 1978, “Tribal underdevelopment in India”Development and Change9(1) 41–70
33.
JoshiM P, 1990Uttaranchal Himalaya: An Essay in Historical Anthropology (Shri Almora Book Depot, Almora)
34.
JoshiM PNegiV S, 1994, “Was there a central Pahari? An appraisal of Grierson's classification of three Pahari language groups”, in Himalaya Past and Present, Volume 3 Eds JoshiM PFangerA CBrownC W (Shri Almora Book Depot, Almora) pp 259–274
35.
KavirajS, 1991, “On state, society and discourse in India”, in Rethinking Third World Politics Ed.ManorJ (Longman, Harlow, Essex) pp 72–99
36.
KhanR, 1989, “The total state: the concept and its manifestation in the Indian political system”, in The State, Political Processes and Identity: Reflections on Modern India Eds HasanZJhaS NKhanR (Sage, New Delhi) pp 33–72
37.
KhanR, 1992Federal India: A Design for Change (Vikas, Delhi)
38.
KohliA (Ed.), 1988India's Democracy: An Analysis of Changing State - Society Relations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
39.
KohliA, 1990Democracy and Discontent: India's Growing Crisis of Governability (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
LambA, 1991Kashmir: A Disputed Legacy, 1946–1990 (Roxford Books, Hertingfordbury)
42.
MarriotM, 1990India Through Hindu Categories (Sage, New Delhi)
43.
MaslowA, 1987Motivation and Personality3rd edition (Harper and Row, New York)
44.
MawdsleyE E, 1996, “The Uttarakhand agitation and the other backward classes”Economic and Political Weekly 27 January, pp 205–210
45.
MawdsleyE E, 1997Non-secessionist Regionalism in India: The Demand for a Separate State of Uttarakhand PhD Thesis, Department of Geography, Cambridge University
46.
MRD, 1995, “Report of the Committee of Members of Parliament and experts constituted to make recommendations on law concerning the extension of provisions of the Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992, to Scheduled Areas”, Bhuria Report, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, January Nainital Samochar undated, copy available from the author
47.
NandNKumarK, 1989The Holy Himalaya: A Geographical Interpretation of Garhwal (Daya Publishing House, Delhi)
48.
OommenT K, 1990State and Society in India: Studies in Nation-building (Sage, London)
49.
PathakA, 1994Contested Domains: The State, Peasants and Forests in Contemporary India (Sage, New Delhi)
50.
QuigleyD, 1993The Interpretation of Caste (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
51.
RadcliffeS A, 1994, “(Representing) post-colonial women: authority, difference and feminism”Area26(1) 25–32
52.
RadcliffeS A, 1996, “Imaginative geographies, post-colonialism and national identities: contemporary discourses of the nation in Ecuador”Ecumene3(1) 23–42
53.
RawatA S, 1989History of Garhwal 1358-1947: An Erstwhile Kingdom in the Himalayas (Indus, New Delhi)
54.
RoutledgeP, 1992, “Putting politics in its place: Baliapal, India, as a terrain of resistance”Political Geography11588–611
55.
RudolphLRudolphS H, 1987In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
56.
SchwarztbergJ E, 1992A Historical Atlas of South Asia (Oxford University Press, New York)
57.
ScottA, 1990Ideology and the New Social Movements (Unwin Hyman, London)
58.
ShahG, 1988, “Grassroots mobilisation in Indian politics”, in India's Democracy: An Analysis of Changing State - Society Relations Ed.KohliA (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) pp 262–304
59.
SmithG E (Ed.), 1995Federalism: The Multiethnic Challenge (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
60.
SmithG E, 1996, “Russia, ethnoregionalism and the politics of federation”Ethnic and Racial Studies19(2) 391–410
61.
ThakurR, 1995The Government and Politics of India (Macmillan, London)
62.
The Pioneer1994, “UMM appeals to President”, 6 October
63.
ThomasR G C (Ed.), 1992Perspectives on Kashmir: The Roots of Conflict in South Asia (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
64.
VanaikA, 1990The Painful Transition: Bourgeois Democracy in India (Verso, London)
65.
VermaR K, 1994Regionalism and Sub-regionalism in State Politics (Deep and Deep Publications, New Delhi)
66.
WeinerM, 1978Sons of the Soil: Migration and Ethnic Conflict in India (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
