The author focuses on the problems inherent in environmentalist critiques of the Indian state, and the inability of their authors to provide a useful analytical approach for reforming state institutions engaged in environmental regulation and natural-resource management. After a review of the arguments made by leading spokespersons of Indian environmentalism, the author provides an alternative framework for understanding the different forms of state intervention in natural-resource management in colonial and postcolonial India. Three factors that have shaped dominant policy phases and strategies of state institutions engaged in resource management are highlighted:
major shifts in the political and economic processes that create pressures for state intervention;
competing demands on state institutions that shape the ways in which intervention occurs; and
conflicts, disputes, and negotiations that redefine the exercise of state control and the forms of resource management. In focusing on the interplay of these three factors, the author illustrates the continuities and major shifts in resource-management strategies adopted by state institutions in India. The inherent weaknesses (and reactionary populism) of Indian environmental debates are discussed, together with the inability of those involved to articulate strategies for moving towards sustainable urban and regional development within the recent policy phase of deregulation and market expansion in India.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgarwalANarainS, 1991, “Chipko people driven to Jungle Kato [cut the forests] stir”Economic Times (New Delhi) 31 March, page 10
2.
AmbedkarB R, 1945Annihilation of Caste: With a Reply to Mahatma Gandhi (Bharat Bhushan Press, Bombay)
3.
AryalM, 1994, “Axing Chipko”Himal78–23
4.
Baden-PowellB H, 1892Land Systems in British India (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
5.
BahugunaS, 1982, “Let the Himalayan forests live”Science Today March, 41–46
6.
BahugunaS, 1988, “The Chipko: a people's movement”, in The Himalayan Heritage Ed.RahaM K (Gian Publishing House, New Delhi) pp 238–248
7.
BardhanP, 1985The Political Economy of Development in India (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
8.
BardhanP, 1991, “State and dynamic comparative advantages”Economic Times (New Delhi) 19–20 March, page 10
9.
BerremanG, 1989, “Chipko: a movement to save the Himalayan environment and people”, in Contemporary Indian Tradition: Voices on Culture, Nature, and the Challenge of Change Ed.BordenC M (Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC) pp 239–266
10.
BhattC P, 1988, “The Chipko movement: strategies, achievements and impacts”, in The Himalayan Heritage Ed.RahaM K (Gian Publishing House, New Delhi) pp 249–265
11.
BowlesSGintisH, 1986Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought (Basic Books, New York)
12.
BrassT, 1994, “The politics of gender, nature, and nation in the discourse of new farmer movements”, in special issue of Journal of Peasant Studies on New Farmers movements in India21(3/4) 27–71
13.
BrassT, 1995, “Old conservatism in new clothes”Journal of Peasant Studies22(3) 516–540
14.
BraudelF, 1977Afterthoughts on Material Civilization and Capitalism (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
15.
BraudelF, 1982The Wheels of Commerce (Harper and Row, New York)
16.
ButtelF H, 1992, “Environmentalization: origins, processes, and implications for rural social change”Rural Sociology57(1) 1–27
17.
ByresT J, 1972, “The dialectic of India's green revolution”South Asian Review5(2) 99–116
18.
ByresT J, 1988Charan Singh (1902-1987): An Assessment (People's Book House, Patna)
19.
ChakravartyS, 1987, Development Planning: The Indian Experience (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
20.
CleghornHRoyleFBaird SmithHStracheyR, 1851, “To consider the probable effects in an economical and physical point of view of the destruction of tropical forests”, report, British Association, Edinburgh
21.
CorbridgeS E, 1988, “The ideology of tribal economy and society: politics in the Jharkhand, 1950–1980”Modern Asian Studies22(1) 1–41
22.
CrononW, 1992, “A place for stories: nature, history, and narrative”Journal of American History781347–1376
23.
DeweyC, 1978, “The end of the imperialism of free trade: the eclipse of the Lancashire lobby and the concession of fiscal autonomy to India”, in The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India Commonwealth Papers 21, 35-67, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, Eds DeweyCHopkinsA G (Athlone Press, London)
24.
DhoundiyalN CDhoundiyalV RSharmaS K, 1993The Separate Hill State (Shree Almora Book Depot, Almora, Uttar Pradesh)
25.
d'MonteD, 1985Temples of Tombs? Industry versus Environment: Three Controversies (Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi)
26.
DograB, 1983Forests and People: A Report on the Himalayas (Dogra, New Delhi)
27.
DrèzeJSenA, 1995India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
28.
EscobarA, 1995Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
29.
EvansP, 1995Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
30.
FernowB, 1911History of Forestry (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, and the Forest Quarterly, Cambridge, MA)
31.
GadgilMGuhaR, 1992This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
32.
GadgilMGuhaR, 1994, “Ecological conflicts and the environmental movement in India”Development and Change25(1) 101–136
33.
GadgilMGuhaR, 1995Ecology and Equity: The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India (Routledge, London)
34.
Government of India, 1956Second Five Year Plan (National Planning Commission, New Delhi)
35.
Government of India, 1961Third Five-Year Plan (National Planning Commission, New Delhi)
36.
Government of India, 1970Fourth Five Year Plan (National Planning Commission, New Delhi)
37.
Government of India, 1976Report of the National Commission on Agriculture (Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation, New Delhi)
38.
GuhaR, 1983, “Forestry in British and post-British India: a historical analysis”Economic and Political Weekly18(45) 1882–1896; (46) 1940–1947
39.
GuhaR, 1986, “Commercial forestry and social conflict in the Indian Himalaya”, Forestry for Development Lecture Series, Department of Forestry, University of California, Berkeley
40.
GuhaR, 1989The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Indian Himalaya (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
41.
GuhaRGadgilM, 1989, “State forestry and social conflict in British India”Past and Present number 123 (May) 141–177
42.
GuhaRanajit, 1962A Rule of Property for Bengal: An Essay on the Idea of Permanent Settlement (Mouton, Paris)
43.
HarrissJ (Ed.), 1982Rural Development: Theories of Peasant Economy and Agrarian Change (Hutchinson Education, London)
44.
HauserW, 1993, “Violence, agrarian radicalism and electoral politics: reflections on the Indian People's Front”Journal of Peasant Studies21(1) 85–126
45.
HeckscherE F, 1935Mercantilism2 Volumes (Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
46.
JacksonC, 1993, “Women/nature or gender/history: a critique of ecofeminist development”Journal of Peasant Studies20(3) 212–226
47.
JewittS, 1995, “Europe's others? Forestry policies and practices in colonial and postcolonial India”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1367–90
48.
LawsonP, 1993The East India Company: A History (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
49.
McClellandJ, 1835Some Inquiries in the Province of Kemaon Relative to Geology, and Other Branches of Natural Science (Baptist Mission Press, Calcutta)
50.
MehtaM C, 1996, “Judicial activism: unexpected saviour”, in Survey of the Environment 1996 (The Hindu Madras) pp 205–209
51.
MiesMShivaV, 1993Ecofeminism (Zed Press, London)
52.
MitraA, 1993, “Chipko: an unfinished mission”Down to Earth 30 April, 25–36
53.
MitraS K, 1992Power, Protest and Participation: Local Elites and the Politics of Development in India (Routledge, London)
54.
NaipaulV S, 1990India: A Million Mutinies Now (Heinemann, London)
55.
NandaM, 1991, “Is modern science a Western, patriarchal myth?”South Asia Bulletin1132–61
56.
NehruJ, 1946The Discovery of India (Oxford University Press, New Delhi)
57.
ParanjpyeV, 1988Evaluating the TehriDam: An Extended Cost-Benefit Appraisal (Intach, New Delhi)
58.
PolanyiK, 1944The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
59.
PouchepadassJ, 1995, “Colonialism and environment in India: comparative perspective”Economic and Political Weekly 19 August, 2059–2067
60.
RajK N, 1973, “Mechanization of agriculture in India and Sri Lanka (Ceylon)”Mechanization and Employment in Agriculture (International Labour Office, Geneva)
61.
RanganH, 1993a, “Romancing the environment: popular environmental action in the Garhwal Himalayas”, in In Defense of Livelihood: Comparative Studies in Environmental Action Eds FriedmannJRanganH (Kumarian Press, Hartford, CT) pp 155–181
62.
RanganH, 1993bOf Myths and Movements: Forestry and Regional Development in the Garhwal Himalayas PhD dissertation, Department of Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles
63.
RanganH, 1996, “From Chipko to Uttaranchal: development, environment, and social protest in the Garhwal Himalayas, India”, in Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements Eds PeetRWattsM J (Routledge, London) pp 205–226
64.
RanganH, 1997, “Property vs control: the state and forest management in the Indian Himalaya”Development and Change28(1) 71–94
65.
RibbentropB, 1900Forestry in British India (reprinted in 1989) (Indus Publishing Company, New Delhi)
66.
RichardsJ FFlintE, 1990, “Long-term transformations in the Sunderbans wetland forests of Bengal”Agriculture and Human Values7(2) 17–33
67.
RichardsJ FHagenJ R, 1987, “A century of rural expansion in Assam, 1870–1970”Itinerario9193–209
68.
RichardsJ FMcAlpinM, 1983, “Cotton cultivating and land clearing in the Bombay Deccan and Karnatak, 1818–1920”, in Global Deforestation and the Nineteenth Century World Economy Eds TuckerRRichardsJ F (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 125–145
69.
RichardsJ FHaynesE SHagenJ R, 1985, “Changing landuse in Bihar, Panjab, and Haryana, 1850–1970”Modern Asian Studies19699–732
70.
RudolphLRudolphS H, 1987In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
71.
SenA, 1960Choice of Techniques (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
72.
SenA, 1981Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlements and Deprivation (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
73.
SenA, 1984Resources, Values and Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
74.
ShivaV, 1989Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development (Zed Press, London)
75.
ShivaV, 1991Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politics (Zed Press, London)
76.
ShivaVBandyopadhyayJ, 1986a, “Environmental conflicts and public interest science”Economic and Political Weekly21(2) 84–90
77.
ShivaVBandyopadhyayJ, 1986bChipko: India's Civilizational Response to the Forest Crisis (Intach, New Delhi)
78.
SrinivasanT N, 1979, “Trends in agriculture in India, 1949–50 to 1977–78”Economic and Political Weekly14 special issue 30–32
79.
StebbingE P, 1932The Forests of India3 volumes (Bodley Head, London)
80.
StokesE, 1959English Utilitarians and India (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
81.
SubramaniamC, 1979The New Strategy in Indian Agriculture (Vikas, New Delhi)
82.
The Hindu1994, “Bhopal: the tragedy continues”, 11 December, page 10
83.
TroupR S, 1922Silviculture of Indian Trees3 Volumes (reprinted 1976) (Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun)
84.
TuckerR P, 1983, “The British colonial system and the forests of the Western Himalaya, 1815–1914”, in Global Deforestation and the Nineteenth Century World Economy Eds TuckerR PRichardsJ F (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 146–166
85.
TuckerR P, 1988, “The British Empire and India's forest resources: the Timberlands of Assam and Kumaon, 1914–1950”, in World Deforestation in the Twentieth Century Eds RichardsJ FTuckerR P (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 91–111
86.
WeberT, 1988Hugging the Trees: The Story of the Chipko Movement (Viking, New Delhi)
87.
WoodheadJ, 1945The Famine Inquiry Commission (Government of India, New Delhi)
88.
WoodmanD, 1969Himalayan Frontiers: A Political Review of British, Chinese, Indian and Russian Rivalries (Barrie and Rockliffe, London)
89.
WrigleyC C, 1978, “Neo-mercantile policies and the new imperialism”, in The Imperial Impact: Studies in the Economic History of Africa and India Eds DeweyCHopkinsA G (Athlone Press, London) pp 68–90
