In this paper I propose a model of gentrification based on the notion that gentrification closes a gap between the flow of housing services fixed in a particular vintage of the housing stock and those available from the most modern properties. This gap is not a rent gap, therefore, but an investment gap. Modelled in this manner, gentrification appears as a problem of maximization under constraint and a subsubset of general home improvements. It is a transient and historically unique (noncyclical) phenomenon. Similarly, these constraints and the opportunities currently available to overcome them exist only in a particular historical context, the peculiarities of which must also be taken into account if gentrification is fully to be explained. In particular, these include the development of domestic technologies and the 19th-century conditions of supply of the housing available currently for gentrifying. I concentrate on the supply-side issues in gentrification, but deny that the demand-side issues can be handled via explanations based on postindustrialism, postmodernity, or the rise of a new middle class.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlonsoW, 1960, “A theory of the urban land market”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association6149–157
2.
AlonsoW, 1964Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
3.
BallM, 1983Housing Policy and Economic Power (Methuen, London)
4.
BallM, 1985, “The urban rent question”Environment and Planning A17503–525
5.
BeauregardR, 1986, “The chaos and complexity of gentrification”, in Gentrification of the City Eds SmithNWilliamsP (Allen and Unwin, London) pp 35–55
6.
BoddyM, 1980The Building Societies (Papermac, London)
7.
BoysJ, 1989, “Images and realities in the middle-class Victorian home”, paper presented at BSA Architecture and Environment Conference, London School of Economics, May; copy available from the author
8.
ClarkE, 1988, “The rent gap and transformation of the built environment: case studies in Malmö, 1860–1985”Geografisker Annaler70-B241–254
9.
ConnellB, 1987/1988, “A healthy spot”The Illustrated Islington History Journal154–5, 8
10.
CowanR S, 1983More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave (Basic Books, New York)
11.
DuncanS S, 1986, “House building, profits and social efficiency in Sweden and Britain”Housing Studies111–33
12.
DuncanS S, 1989, “Development gains and housing provision in Britain and Sweden”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series141–16
13.
Du VallN, 1988Domestic Technologies: A Chronlogy of Developments (G K Hall, Boston, MA)
14.
ForrestRMurieP, 1987, “The affluent homeowner: labour-market position and the shaping of housing histories”, in Class and Space Eds ThriftNWilliamsP (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 330–359
15.
ForrestRMurieAWilliamsP, 1990Home Ownership: Differentiation and Fragmentation (Unwin Hyman, London)
16.
FussellA, 1988a, “Immigrants into Islington, part 1”The Illustrated Islington History Journal165–6
17.
FussellA, 1988b, “Immigrants into Islington, part 3”The Illustrated Islington History Journal16 page 6
18.
FussellA, 1989, “Immigrants into Islington, part 5”The Illustrated Islington History Journal22 page 6
19.
HamnettCWilliamsP, 1980, “Social change in London: a study of gentrification”Urban Affairs Quarterly15469–487
20.
HarcourtG, 1972Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
21.
HardymentC, 1988From Mangle to Microwave: The Mechanization of Household Work (Polity Press, Cambridge)
22.
HoytH, 1939The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American CitiesFederal Housing Administration, United States Government, Washington, DC
23.
JenkinsS, 1975Landlords to London: The Story of a Capital and its Growth (Constable, London)
24.
LeesL, 1994, “Rethinking gentrification: beyond the positions of economics or culture”Progress in Human Geography18137–150
25.
MillsC, 1988, “Life on the upslope: the postmodern landscape of gentrification”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6169–189
26.
MurieANinerPWatsonC, 1976Housing Policy and the Housing System (Allen and Unwin, London)
27.
NyeD, 1991Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology, 1880–1940 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
28.
OfferA, 1978Property and Politics 1870-1914: Landowner ship, Law, Ideology and Urban Development in England (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
29.
OlsenD, 1976The Growth of Victorian London (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
30.
PasinettiL L, 1974Growth and Income Distribution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
31.
PeachG C K (Ed.), 1975Urban Social Segregation (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
32.
RabanJ, 1974Soft City (Hamish Hamilton, London)
33.
RedfernP, 1997, “A new look at gentrification: 1. Gentrification and domestic technologies”Environment and Planning A1275–1296
34.
RodgerR, 1989Housing in Urban Britain 1780-1914: Class, Capitalism and Construction (Macmillan, London)
35.
Rose, 1984, “Rethinking gentrification: beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space247–74
36.
RuncimanW G, 1969Social Science and Political Theory2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
37.
SaundersP, 1984, “Beyond housing classes: the sociological significance of private property rights in the means of consumption”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research8202–227
38.
SaundersP, 1989, “The meaning of home in contemporary English culture”Housing Studies4177–192
39.
SaundersP, 1990A Nation of Homeowners (Unwin Hyman, London)
40.
SayerA, 1982, “Explanation in economic geography”Progress in Human Geography668–88
41.
SayerD, 1991Capitalism and Modernity: An Excursus on Marx and Weber (Routledge, London)
42.
SmithA, 1977The Wealth of Nations first published 1776 (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
43.
SmithN, 1979, “Toward a theory of gentrification: a back to the city movement by capital, not people”Journal of the American Planning Association45538–548
44.
SmithN, 1987a, “Gentrification and the rent gap”Annals, Association of American Geographers77462–478
45.
SmithN, 1987b, “Of yuppies and housing: gentrification, social restructuring and the urban dream”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5151–172
46.
Stedman JonesG, 1974Outcast London (Peregrine Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
47.
ThompsonF M L, 1988The Rise of Respectable Society: A Social History of Victorian Britain 1830-1900 (Fontana, London)
48.
ThorntonP, 1985Authentic Decor 1620-1920 (Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London)
49.
WallerP J, 1983Town, City and Nation: England 1850-1914 (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
50.
WeightmanGHumphriesS, 1983The Making of Modern London 1815-1914 (Sidgwick and Jackson, London)
51.
WilliamsP, 1976, “The role of institutions in the inner London housing market: the case of IslingtonTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series172–82
52.
WilliamsR, 1976Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (Fontana and Croom Helm, London)
53.
WilliamsR, 1977Marxism and Literature (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
