In this paper I take issue with what I identify as a basic consensus in gentrification studies. I argue that gentrification studies have been conducted within a context framed by two basic models of urban development, namely the Burgess concentric-zone model and the Alonso bid-rent model. These two models lie at the heart of what are more usually seen as the parameters of the gentrification debate, namely the ‘supply-side’ rent-gap account of gentrification offered by Neil Smith and his followers and the ‘demand-side’ consumption-oriented explanations offered by David Ley and his followers. Both sets of explanations are, however, fatally compromised by seeking to answer the question ‘why does gentrification occur?’ before answering the question ‘how does gentrification occur?’. Starting with the question ‘how?’, rather than ‘why?’, draws attention to the hitherto almost completely neglected role of domestic technologies in permitting gentrification to occur, thereby helping break the theoretical logjam in which the gentrification debate currently finds itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhlbrandtRBrophyP C, 1975Neighbourhood Revitalization: Theory and Practice (Heath, Lexington, MA)
2.
AlonsoW, 1960, “A theory of the urban land market”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association6149–157
3.
AlonsoW, 1964Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
4.
BadcockB, 1989, “An Australian view of the rent gap hypothesis”Annals of the Association of American Geographers79125–145
5.
BadcockB, 1993, “Notwithstanding the exaggerated claims, residential revitalisation really is changing the form of some western cities: a response to Bourne”Urban Studies30191–195
6.
BaumannZ, 1992Intimations of Postmodernity (Routledge, London)
7.
BellD, 1973The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (Basic Books, New York)
8.
BeauregardR, 1986, “The chaos and complexity of gentrification”, in Gentrification of the City Eds SmithNWilliamsP (Allen and Unwin, London) pp 35–55
9.
BondiL, 1991, “Gender divisions and gentrification: a critique”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series16190–198
10.
BourassaS C, 1993, “The rent gap debunked”Urban Studies301731–1744
11.
BourneL S, 1993a, “The myth and reality of gentrification—a commentary on emerging urban forms”Urban Studies30183–189
12.
BourneL S, 1993b, “The demise of gentrification? A commentary and prospective view”Urban Geography1495–107
13.
BurgessE, 1925, “The growth of the city: introduction to a research project”, in The City Eds ParkR EBurgessEMcKenzieRWirthL (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 47–62
14.
CaulfieldJ, 1989, “Gentrification' and desire”Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology26617–632
15.
ClarkE, 1988, “The rent gap and transformation of the built environment: case studies in Malmö, 1860–1985”Geografisker Annaler70B241–254
16.
ClarkE, 1994, “Towards a Copenhagen interpretation of gentrification”Urban Studies311033–1042
17.
CowanR S, 1983More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave (Basic Books, New York)
18.
du VallN, 1988Domestic Technologies: A Chronology of Developments (G K Hall, Boston, MA)
19.
HailaA, 1990“The theory of land rent at the crossroads”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space8275–296
20.
HamnettC, 1973, “Improvement grants as an indicator of gentrification in Inner London”Area5252–261
21.
HamnettC, 1984, “Gentrification and residential location theory: a review and assessment”, in Geography and the Urban Environment: Progess in Research and Applications Volume 6 Eds HerbertDJohnstonR (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 283–320
22.
HamnettC, 1991, “The blind men and the elephant: the explanation of gentrification”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series16173–189
23.
HarcourtG, 1972Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
24.
HardymentC, 1988From Mangle to Microwave: The Mechanization of Household Work (Polity Press, Cambridge)
25.
HooverEVernonR, 1962Anatomy of a Metropolis (Doubleday, New York)
26.
HowardM CKingJ E, 1975The Political Economy of Marx (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
27.
HumphriesSTaylorJ, 1986The Making of Modern London 1945-1985 (Sidgwick and Jackson, London)
28.
HunkinT, 1989The Secret Life of Machines (Channel 4, London)
29.
KernC, 1984, “Upper income residential revival in the city”, in Research in Urban Economics Volume 4, Ed. EbelR (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT)
MillsC, 1988, “Life on the upslope: the postmodern landscape of gentrification”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6169–189
44.
MuntI, 1987, “Economic restructuring, culture, and gentrification: a case study of Battersea, London”Environment and Planning A191175–1197
45.
MuthR, 1969Cities and Housing: The Spatial Pattern of Residential Growth (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
46.
MyersD, 1992, “Filtering in time: rethinking the longitudinal behavior of neighborhood housing markets”, in Housing Demography: Linking Demographic Structure and Housing Markets Ed. MyersD (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) pp 274–296
47.
NyeD, 1991Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology, 1880–1940 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
48.
PrattG, 1981, “Class analysis and urban domestic property: a critical examination”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research6481–501
49.
RedfernP, 1992There Goes the Neighbourhood: Gentrification and Marginality in Modern Life unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, London
50.
RedfernP, 1997, “A new look at gentrification: 2. A model of gentrification”Environment and Planning A forthcoming
51.
RoseD, 1984, “Rethinking gentrification: beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space247–74
52.
RuncimanW G, 1969Social Science and Political Theory2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
53.
SaidE, 1991Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
54.
SaundersP, 1989, “The meaning of home in contemporary English culture”Housing Studies4177–192
55.
SaundersP, 1990A Nation of Homeowners (Unwin Hyman, London)
56.
SmithN, 1979a, “Toward a theory of gentrification: a back to the city movement by capital, not people”Journal of the American Planning Association45538–548
57.
SmithN, 1979b, “Gentrification and capital: theory, practice and ideology in society hill”Antipode1124–35; reprinted in Antipode 1985, 17 pp 163–173
58.
SmithN, 1982, “Gentrification and uneven development”Economic Geography58139–155
59.
SmithN, 1984Uneven Development (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
60.
SmithN, 1987a, “Gentrification and the rent gap”Annals, Association of American Geographers77462–478
61.
SmithN, 1987b, “Of yuppies and housing: gentrification, social restructuring and the urban dream”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5151–172
62.
SmithN, 1992, “Blind man's buff, or Hamnett's philosophical individualism in search of gentrification”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series17110–115
63.
SmithNLeFaivreM, 1984, “A class analysis of gentrification”, in Gentrification, Displacement and Neighborhood Revitalization Eds PalenJLondonB (SUNY Press, Albany, NY)
64.
SmithPMcCannE, 1981, “Residential land-use succession in Edmonton Alberta”Annals of the Association of American Geographers71536–551
65.
Stedman JonesG, 1974Outcast London (Peregrine Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
66.
SullivanA, 1990Urban Economics (Irwin, Homewood, IL)
67.
WalkerRGreenbergD, 1982a, “Post-industrialism and political reform in the city: a critique”Antipode1417–32
68.
WalkerRGreenbergD, 1982b, “A guide for the Ley reader of Marxist criticism”Antipode1438–43
69.
WeberM, 1976The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (Allen and Unwin, London)
70.
van WeesepJ, 1994, “Gentrification as a research frontier”Progress in Human Geography1874–83
71.
WilliamsP, 1984, “Gentrification in Britain and Europe”, in Gentrification, Displacement and Neighborhood Revitalization Eds PalenJLondonB (SUNY Press, Albany, NY) pp 205–234
72.
WilliamsR, 1977Marxism and Literature (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
