Single equation economic base methodology as employed in this paper is briefly outlined together with its limitations and advantages relative to input—output methodology. Both methodologies are utilized to derive alternative estimates of a port's impact on output, income, and employment in the surrounding region. Economic base impacts were up to 5% larger than type 1 input—output impacts and up to 17% smaller than type 2 impacts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AustinM JTowillD H, 1981Fraser Port: Economic Impact Study (Fraser River Harbor Commission, Suite 505, 713 Columbia Street, New Westminster, BC)
2.
BillingsR B, 1969, “The mathematical identity of the multipliers derived from the economic base model and the input-output model”Journal of Regional Science9471–473
3.
ButcherG V, 1990Regional Inter-industry Transactions Tables (Butcher Partners, Box 48, Tai Tapu, Canterbury, New Zealand)
4.
GerkingS DIssermanA M, 1981, “Bifurcation and the time pattern of impacts in the economic base model”Journal of Regional Science21451–467
5.
LittleA D, 1979Port Economic Impact Kit Arthur D Little Inc. (US Department of Commerce, Maritime Administration, Office of Port and Intermodal Development, Washington, DC)
6.
MerrifieldJ, 1987, “A note on the general mathematical equivalency of economic base and aggregate input—output multipliers: fact or fiction”Journal of Regional Science27651–654
MulliganG F, 1994, “Multiplier effects and structural change: applying economic base analysis to small economies”Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies63–21
9.
MulliganG FFikT J, 1994, “Using dummy variables to estimate economic base multipliers”Professional Geographer46368–378
10.
MulliganG FGibsonL J, 1984, “Regression estimates of economic base multipliers for small communities”Economic Geography60225–237
11.
NZIER, 1992Tourism in New Zealand: A Regional and National Multiplier Analysis (New Zealand Institute of Economic Research, Box 3479, Wellington, New Zealand)
12.
OlfertM RStablerJ C, 1994, “Community level multipliers for rural development initiatives”Growth and Change25467–486
13.
RobisonM HMillerJ R, 1991, “Central place theory and intercommunity input—output analysis”Papers in Regional Science70399–417
14.
RomanoffE, 1974“The economic base model: a very special case of input—output analysis”Journal of Regional Science14121–129
15.
SmithM I AHughesW R, 1993Port of Tauranga: 1993 Economic Impact Study (The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand)