In this paper recent considerations of the human subject and of the nature and uses of theory are convened around the work of Marxist theorist David Harvey. This is done to contest two prevailing views of his work and to explore critically two alternative readings. The first view suggests that Harvey is exclusively a theorist of the capitalist space economy; against this it is suggested that he offers one of the most ambitious readings of subjectivity within human geography. The second view suggests that Harvey is a ‘modern’ theorist, whose preoccupation with economy and class leads him into the perils of theoretical authoritarianism, exclusivity, and abstraction; against this it is suggested that Harvey's Marxism claims to be intrinsically reflexive. More particularly, the thesis that there is an essential, rather than contingent, relation between Harvey's theorisation of ‘the subject of capital’ and his own practices as a theorist is explored: given that Harvey claims ‘the subject of capital’ is but one subject-position, to what extent, it is asked, is he in practice aware of the limits of his own theoretical propositions? At the same time, an examination of the degree to which Harvey's reading of subjectivity is sufficiently cogent to contribute to an ecumenical, ‘post-modern’ project to make sense of subjection and agency within contemporary Western societies is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbercrombieNHillSTurnerB S, 1986Sovereign Individuals of Capitalism (Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA)
2.
AlthusserLBalibarE, 1970Reading Capital translated by BrewsterB (New Left Books, London)
3.
AndersonP, 1980Arguments within English Marxism (Verso, London)
4.
AndersonP, 1989Considerations on Western Marxismsecond edition (Verso, London)
5.
ArcherK, 1987, “Mythology and the problem of reading in urban and regional research”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5384–393
6.
AronowitzS, 1992The Politics of Identity (Routledge, New York)
7.
BarnesT, 1988, “Rationality and relativism in economic geography: An interpretive review of the homo economicus assumption”Progress in Human Geography12473–498
8.
BarnesT, 1989, “Place, space and theories of economic value: Contextualism and essentialism in economic geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series14299–316
9.
BarrettM, 1991The Politics of Truth (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
10.
BenhabibS, 1986Critique, Norm and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory (Columbia University Press, New York)
11.
BernsteinR, 1991The New Constellation (Polity Press, Cambridge)
12.
BondiL, 1993, “Locating identity politics”, in Place and the Politics of Identity Eds KeithMPileS (Routledge, London) pp 84–101
13.
CallinicosA, 1989Marxist Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
14.
CarchediG, 1993, “Marx's logic of inquiry and price formation”, in Marx's Method in Capital Ed. MoseleyF (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ) pp 185–216
15.
CastreeN, 1992Readings in Historico-Geographical Materialism MA thesis, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
16.
CastreeN, 1994, “Teaching philosophy, theory and history: Notes on representing Marxism and ‘Marxist geography’”Journal of Geography in Higher Education1833–42
17.
CohenG A, 1981, “The labour theory of value and the concept of exploitation”, in The Value Controversy Eds SteedmanISweezyP (Verso, London) pp 202–223
18.
CohenM, 1993Profane Illumination: Walter Benjamin and the Paris of Surrealist Revolution (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
19.
CorbridgeSMartinRThriftN, 1994Money, Power and Space (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
20.
DanielsS, 1985, “Arguments for a humanistic geography”, in The Future of Geography Ed. JohnstonR J (Methuen, Andover, Hants) pp 143–158
21.
DearM, 1988, “The postmodern challenge: Reconstructing human geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series13262–274
22.
DennisR, 1987, “Faith in the city?”Journal of Historical Geography13310–316
23.
DennisR, 1988, “By the waters of Babylon”Journal of Historical Geography14307–308
24.
DeutscheR, 1991, “Boy's town”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space95–30
25.
de VroeyM, 1981, “Value, production, and exchange”, in the Value Controversy Eds SteedmanISweezyP (Verso, London) pp 173–201
26.
DuncanJLeyD, 1982, “Structural marxism and human geography: A critical assessment”Annals of the Association of American Geographers7230–59
27.
EagletonT, 1990The Significance of Theory (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
28.
EagletonT, 1991Ideology: An Introduction (Verso, London)
29.
ElsonD, 1979, “The value theory of labour”, in Value Ed. ElsonD (CSE Books, London) pp 115–180
30.
FracchiaJ, 1991, “Marx's aufhebung of philosophy and the foundations of a materialist science of history”History and Theory30153–179
31.
FraserN, 1989Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN)
32.
FraserNNicholsonL, 1990, “Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism”, in Feminism/Postmodernism Ed. NicholsonL (Routledge, London) pp 19–38
33.
GrahamJ, 1988, “Post-modernism and Marxism”Antipode2060–66
34.
GrahamJ, 1990, “Theory and essentialism in Marxist geography”Antipode2253–66
35.
GregoryD, 1991, “Interventions in the historical geography of modernity: Social theory, spatiality and the politics of representation”Geografiska Annaler73B17–44
HarveyD, 1993, “From space to place and back again: Reflections on the condition of postmodernity”, in Mapping the Futures Eds BirdJCurtisBPutnamTRobertsonGTicknerL (Routledge, New York) pp 3–29
51.
HoggettP, 1992, “A place for experience: A psychoanalytic perspective on boundary, identity, and culture”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space10345–356
52.
HussainA, 1979, “Misreading Marx's theory of value: Marx's marginal notes on Wagner”, in Value Ed. ElsonD (CSE Books, London) pp 82–101
53.
LaclauEMouffeC, 1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (Verso, London)
54.
LashSFriedmanJ, 1991Modernity and Identity (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
55.
LyotardJ F, 1984The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Manchester University Press, Manchester)
56.
McCarneyJ, 1980The Real World of Ideology (Harvester Press, Brighton)
57.
McCarneyJ, 1990Social Theory and the Crisis of Marxism (Verso, London)
MarxK, 1843, “A contribution to the critique of Hegel's philosophy of law”, in Collected Worksvolume 3, Eds MarxKEngelsF (Lawrence and Wishart, London) (1975) pp 70–101
60.
MarxK, 1857, “General introduction to the Grundrisse”, in Collected Worksvolume 28, Eds MarxKEngelsF (Lawrence and Wishart, London) (1986) pp 17–45
61.
MarxK, 1858, “Grundrisse”, in Collected WorksVolume 28, Eds MarxKEngelsF (Lawrence and Wishart, London) (1986) pp 49–473
62.
MarxK, 1935The Eighteenth Brumaire of Napoleon Bonaparte Ed. DuttC P (International Publishers, New York)
63.
MarxK, 1973Grundrisse translated by NicolausM (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
64.
MarxK, 1976Capitalvolume I, translated by FowkesB (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
65.
MasseyD, 1991, “Flexible sexism”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space931–57
66.
MephamJ, 1979, “The theory of ideology in Capital”, in Issues in Marxist Philosophyvolume 3, Eds MephamJHillel-RubenD (Harvester Press, Brighton) pp 141–174
67.
MerrifieldA, 1993, “Place and space: A Lefebvrian reconciliation”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series18516–531
68.
MilbergW, 1991, “Marxism, post-structuralism and the discourse of economists”Rethinking Marxism493–104
69.
MoseleyF, 1993Marx's Method in Capital: A Reexamination (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ)
70.
MurrayP, 1988Marx's Theory of Scientific Knowledge (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ)
71.
NielsenK, 1989, “The concept of ideology: Some Marxist and non-Marxist conceptualisations”Rethinking Marxism2146–173
72.
NorrisC, 1990What's Wrong with Postmodernism? (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
73.
OilmanB, 1980Alienationsecond edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
74.
PatemanC, 1988The Sexual Contract (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
75.
PileS, 1993, “Human agency and human geography revisited: A critique of ‘new models’ of the self”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series18122–139
76.
PillingG, 1980Marx's Capital: Philosophy and Political Economy (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
77.
PosterM, 1989Critical Theory and Poststructuralism (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
78.
PrattG, 1993, “Reflections on poststructuralism and feminist empirics, theory, and practice”Antipode2551–63
79.
PrattGHansonS, 1994, “Geography and the construction of difference”Gender, Place, and Culture15–30
80.
PredA, 1986Place, Practice, and Structure: Social and Spatial Transformation in Southern Sweden, 1750–1850 (Polity Press, Cambridge)
81.
ReschR P, 1992Althusser and the Renewal of Marxist Social Theory (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
82.
RoseG, 1993Gender and Geography (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
83.
SayerA, 1993, “Postmodernist thought in geography: A realist view”Antipode25320–344
84.
SayerD, 1987The Violence of Abstraction (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
85.
SayerD, 1991Capitalism and Modernity (Routledge, London)
86.
SheppardEBarnesT J, 1990The Capitalist Space Economy: Geographical Analysis after Ricardo, Marx and Sraffa (Unwin Hyman, London)
87.
SmithN, 1987, “Rascal concepts, minimalizing discourse, and the politics of geography”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5377–383
88.
SmithP, 1988Discerning the Subject (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
89.
SmithT, 1990The Logic of Marx's Capital (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
90.
SojaE, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London)
91.
SpivakG C, 1988In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics (Routledge, London)
92.
SteedmanI, 1977Marx After Sraffa (New Left Books, London)
93.
SteedmanI, 1981, “Ricardo, Marx, Sraffa”, in The Value Controversy Eds SteedmanISweezyP (Verso, London) pp 11–19
94.
SteedmanISweezyP, (Eds), 1981The Value Controversy (Verso, London)
95.
StorperM, 1987, “The post-Enlightenment challenge to Marxist urban studies”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5418–427
