AminARobinsK, 1990a, “Industrial districts and regional development: Limits and possibilities”, in Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy Eds PykeFBecattiniGSengenbergerW (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva) pp 185–219
2.
AminARobinsK, 1990b, “The re-emergence of regional economies? The mythical geography of flexible production”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space87–34
3.
BullA CPittMSzarkaJ, 1991, “Small firms and industrial districts: Structural explanations of small firm viability in three countires”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development383–99
4.
DickenPThriftN, 1992, “The organization of production and the production of organization: Why business enterprises matter in the study of geographical industrialization”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series17279–291
5.
DunfordMBenkoG, 1991, “Neo-Fordism or post-Fordism? Some conclusions and further remarks”, in Industrial Change and Regional Development Eds BenkoGDunfordM (Belhaven Press, London) pp 286–305
6.
GertlerM S, 1988, “The limits to flexibility: Comments on the post-Fordist vision of production and its geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series13419–432
7.
GertlerM S, 1992, “Flexibility revisited: Districts, nation-states, and the forces of production”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series17259–278
8.
GertlerM S, 1993, “Implementing advanced manufacturing technologies in mature industrial regions: Towards a social model of technology production”Regional Studies27665–680
9.
GoodmanEBamfordJSaynorP, (Eds), 1989Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy (Routledge, London)
10.
HansenN, 1992, “Competition, trust, and reciprocity in the development of innovative regional milieux”Papers in Regional Science7195–105
11.
HarrisonB, 1992, “Industrial districts: Old wine in new bottles?”Regional Studies26469–483
12.
HarrisonB, 1994Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility (Basic Books, New York)
13.
HarveyD, 1988, “The geographical and geopolitical consequences of the transition from Fordist to flexible accumulation”, in America's New Market Geography Eds SternliebGHughesJ W (Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 101–134
14.
JessopB, 1992a, “Post-Fordism and flexible specialisation: Incommensurable, contradictory, complementary, or just plain different perspectives?”, in Regional Development and Contemporary Industrial Response: Extending Flexible Specialisation Eds ErnsteHMeierV (Belhaven Press, London) pp 25–43
15.
JessopB, 1992b, “Fordism and post-Fordism: A critical reformulation”, in Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development Eds StorperMScottA J (Belhaven Press, London) pp 46–69
16.
SmithLawton HDicksonKSmithS L, 1991, “‘There are two sides to every story’: Innovation and collaboration within networks of large and small firms”Research Policy20457–468
17.
LoveringJ, 1990, “Fordism's unknown successor: A comment on Scott's theory of flexible accumulation and the re-emergence of regional economies”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research14159–174
18.
MaleckiEVeldhoenM, forthcoming, “Network activities, information and competitiveness in small firms”Geografiska Annaler series B
19.
PioreMSabelC, 1984The Second Industrial Divide (Basic Books, New York)
20.
PykeFSengenbergerW, (Eds), 1992Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva)
21.
PykeFBecattiniGSengenbergerW, (Eds), 1990Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Co-operation in Italy (International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva)
22.
SaxenianA, 1994Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
23.
ScottA J, 1985, “Location processes, urbanization, and territorial development: An exploratory essay”Environment and Planning A17479–501
24.
ScottA J, 1988a, “Flexible production systems and regional development: The rise of new industrial spaces in North America and western Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12171–186
25.
ScottA J, 1988bMetropolis: From Division of Labor to Urban Form (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
26.
ScottA JPaulA S, 1990, “Collective order and economic coordination in industrial agglomerations: The technopoles of Southern California”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy8179–193
27.
StorperM, 1993, “Regional ‘worlds’ of production: Learning and innovation in the technology districts of France, Italy and the USA”Regional Studies27433–455
28.
StorperMHarrisonB, 1991, “Flexibility, hierarchy and regional development: The changing structure of industrial production systems and their forms of governance in the 1990s”Research Policy20407–422
29.
SweeneyG P, 1991, “Technical culture and the local dimension of entrepreneurial vitality”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development3363–378