OPCS, 1993a, “An information paper on the geography base in England and Wales for the 2001 Census”, paper for the Demographic Liaison Group, Census Sub-Group, Office of Population Census and Surveys, St Catherine's House, Kingsway, London WC2B 6LH
2.
OPCS, 1993b, “2001 Census—England and Wales Geography Base”, note of meetings held in St Catherine's House, London on Thursday, 8 July 1993 and at the University of Leeds on Wednesday, 14 July 1993; Office of Population Census and Surveys, Titchfield, Fareham, Hants PO15 5RR
3.
RhindD WColeK JArmstrongMChowLOpenshawS, no date, “An online, secure and infinitely flexible database system for the national population census”, SERRL WP-14, Birkbeck College, Department of Geography, University of London
4.
AshmoreM, 1989The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
5.
BarnesJ, 1977Interests and the Growth of Knowledge (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
6.
BarnesT, 1993, “Whatever happened to the philosophy of science?”Environment and Planning A25301–304
7.
BleierR, 1986, “Introduction”, in Feminist Approaches to Science Ed. BleierR (Pergamon, New York) pp 1–17
8.
BloorD, 1976Knowledge and Social Imagery (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London)
9.
BrownJ R, 1989The Rational and the Social (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants)
10.
CodeL, 1993, “Taking subjectivity into account”, in Feminist Epistemologies Eds AlcoffLPotterE (Routledge, New York) pp 15–48
11.
CollinsH, 1985Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
12.
CollinsHYearleyS, 1992, “Epistemological chicken”, in Science as Practice and Culture Ed. PickeringA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 301–326
13.
HackingI, 1983Representing and Intervening (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
14.
HackingI, 1992, “The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences”, in Science as Practice and Culture Ed. PickeringA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 29–64
15.
HardingS, 1991Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? (Open University Press, Milton Keynes)
16.
HardingS, 1993a, “Feminism, science and the anti-Enlightenment critiques”, in Feminism/Postmodernism Ed. NicholsonL (Routledge, New York) pp 83–106
17.
HardingS, 1993b, “Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity?”, in Feminist Epistemologies Eds AlcoffLPotterE (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants) pp 49–82
18.
HendersonD, 1990, “On the sociology of science and the continuing importance of epistemologically couched accounts”Social Studies of Science20113–148
19.
HesseM, 1980Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science (Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex)
20.
KellerE, 1984Reflections on Gender and Science (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
21.
LatourBWoolgarS, 1979Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage, London)
22.
LloydG, 1984The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
23.
LonginoH, 1990Science as Social Knowledge (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
24.
LonginoH, 1993, “Essential tensions—phase two: Feminist philosophical and social studies of science”, in A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity Eds AntonyLWittC (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 257–272
25.
MillerR, 1987Fact and Method (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
26.
NiiniluotoI, 1991, “Realism, relativism and constructivism”Synthese89135–162
27.
PapineauD, 1988, “Does the sociology of science discredit science?”, in Relativism and Realism in Science Ed. NolaR (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht) pp 1–36
28.
PickeringA, 1984Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
29.
PickeringA, 1990, “Knowledge, practice and mere construction”Social Studies of Science20682–729
30.
PickeringA (Ed.), 1992Science as Practice and Culture (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
31.
PinchTPinchT, 1988, “Reservations about reflexivity and new literary forms, or why let the devil have all the good tunes?”, in Knowledge and Reflexivity Ed. WoolgarS (Sage, London) pp 178–199
32.
RothPBarrettR, 1990, “Deconstructing quarks”Social Studies of Science20579–632
33.
SismondoS, 1993, “Some social constructions”Social Studies of Science23515–553
34.
WoolgarS (Ed.), 1988Knowledge and Reflexivity: Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge (Sage, London)