The authors identify problems associated with the treatment of Latin American topics in the Anglo-American social science literature, particularly in geography. Latin American research has been peripheralized and the flow of concepts and learning between Latin and Anglo America has been almost entirely from North to South. To explain why research by Latin Americans, and by Latin Americanists, has had relatively limited influence on recent geographic debates over theory and method, the authors employ contemporary discourse analysis. This method assists us in (1) deciphering how development geography presents Latin America, (2) in posing questions about the character and origins of the concepts that shape writing and, indeed, thinking, and (3) in identifying the perspective biases that must be confronted for interregional dialogue to occur. This critical commentary on Latin and Anglo-American research is highly relevant to reconstructed regional geography. It, too, is confronting issues such as the role of theory in contextually grounded research, and how to operationalize research that spans several geographical scales of analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ, 1987Place and Politics (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA)
2.
AnzaldúaG, 1987Borderlands: La Frontera (Spinsters Aunt Lute Book Company, San Francisco, CA)
3.
BarffRAustenJ, 1993, “‘It's gotta be da shoes’: Domestic manufacturing, international subcontracting and the production of athletic footwear”Environment and Planning A251103–1114
4.
BeneriaLFeldmanS, 1992Unequal Burden: Economic Crises, Persistent Poverty, and Women's Work (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
5.
BentonL, 1989Invisible Factories: The Informal Economy and Industrial Development in Spain (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
6.
BromleyR, 1990a, “A service explosion? Reflections on the tertiarization of Third World countries”, in Space, Society and Development: Essays in Honour of Professor R P Misra Eds SundaramKVRameshATiwariPS (Heritage Publishers, New Delhi) pp 167–176
7.
BromleyR, 1990b, “A new path to development? The significance and impact of Hernando De Soto's ideas on underdevelopment, production and reproduction”Economic Geography66328–348
8.
ButzerKW (Ed.), 1992, “The Americas before and after 1492: Current geographical research”Annals of the Association of American Geographers82343–568
9.
CapecchiV, 1989, “The informal economy and the development of flexible specialization in Emilia-Romagna”, in The Informal Economy Eds PortesACastellsMBentonL (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 189–215
10.
CardosoHFalettoE, 1979Dependency and Development in Latin America (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
11.
ChildersMHooksB, 1990, “A conversation about race and class”, in Conflicts in Feminism Eds HirschMFox-KellerE (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants) pp 60–81
12.
CollinsPH, 1991, “Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought”, in Beyond Methodology Eds FonowMCookJ (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN) pp 35–59
13.
DeereCDAntrobusPBollesLMelendezEPhillipsPRiveraMSafaH, 1990In the Shadows of the Sun: Caribbean Development Alternatives and US Policy. Policy Alternatives for the Caribbean and Central America (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
14.
EscobarA, 1984, “Discourse and power in development: Michael Foucault and the relevance of his work to the Third World”Alternatives10377–400
15.
EscobarA, 1988, “Power and visibility: The invention and management of development in the Third World”Cultural Anthropology3428–443
16.
EscobarA, 1992, “Imagining a post-development era? Critical thought, development and social movements”Social Text31/3220–56
17.
Fernández-KellyMP, 1983For We Are Sold: I and My People (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY)
18.
Fernández-KellyMPGarciaAM, 1989, “Informalization at the core: Hispanic women, homework and the advanced capitalist state”, in The Informal Economy Eds PortesACastellsMBentonL (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 247–264
19.
FloraCB, 1989, “Women find new options, forge new roles in rural America”Earth Matters: A Journal of Faith, Community and Resources386–12
20.
FloridaRKenneyM, 1988, “Social institutions and economic restructuring: Response and adaptation to technological change in the US and Japan”, WP 87–33, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
21.
FoucaultM, 1972The Archeology of Knowledge (Harper Colophon Books, New York)
22.
FranksJ, 1993, “Macroeconomic policy and the informal sector”, in Contrapunto: The Informal Sector Debate in Latin America Ed. RakowskiC A (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) forthcoming
23.
FuentesC, 1991, “Can Mexico be Mexico”LA Times 4 October, pages M1, M6
24.
FurtadoC, 1976Economic Development of Latin America: Historical Background and Contemporary Problems2nd edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
25.
GereffiG, 1983The Pharmaceutical Industry and Dependency in the Third World (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
26.
GiddensA, 1990Consequences of Modernity (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA)
27.
GoreC, 1984Regions in Question: Space, Development Theory and Regional Policy (Methuen, New York)
28.
Hays-MitchellM, 1993, “The ties that bind. Informal and formal sector linkages in streetvending: The case of Peru's ambulantes”Environment and Planning A251085–1102
29.
JacksonP, 1991, “The crisis of representation and the politics of position”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space9131–134
30.
JaroszL, 1992, “Constructing the dark continent: Metaphor as geographic representation of Africa”Geografiska Annaler B74(2) 105–115
31.
JenkinsR, 1987Transnational Corporations and the Latin American Automobile Industry (Macmillan, London)
32.
KayC, 1989Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York)
33.
KlakT, 1992, “Recession, the state and working class shelter: A comparison of Quito and Guayaquil during the 1980s”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie83120–137
34.
KlakT, 1993, “Why do shelter conditions differ in Ecuadoran cities and how do we know that they do?: A comparative locality study”Environment and Planning A251115–1130
35.
KlakTRulliJ, 1993, “Regimes of accumulation, the Caribbean Basin Initiative and export processing zones: Scales of influence on Caribbean development”, in The New Localism: Comparative Urban Politics in a Global Era Eds GoetzEClarkeSE (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) forthcoming
36.
Lancaster Regionalism Group, 1985Localities, Class, and Gender (Pion, London)
37.
LawsonV, 1992, “Industrial subcontracting and employment forms in Latin America: A framework for contextual analysis”Progress in Human Geography161–23
38.
LipietzA, 1986, “New tendencies in the international division of labor”, in Production, Work, and Territory Eds ScottAStorperM (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA) pp 16–39
39.
ManiLFrankenbergR, 1985, “The challenge of orientalism”Economy and Society14174–192
40.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labor (Macmillan, London)
41.
MasseyDMeeganRPolitics and Method (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
42.
MorganKSayerA, 1988Microcircuits of Capital: Sunrise Industry and Uneven Development (Polity Press, Cambridge)
43.
MoserC, 1989, “The impact of recession and structural adjustment policies at the microlevel: Low income women and their households in Guayaquil, Ecuador”, discussion paper, Department of Social Administration, London School of Economics and Political Science, London
44.
NewfarmerR, 1986, “Economic policy toward the Caribbean Basin: The balance sheet”Journal of Inter American Studies and World Affairs2763–90
45.
New Internationalist1992, “Development: A guide to the ruins (special issue devoted to the writings of Wolfgang Sachs)” number 232 (June), pp 5–27
46.
Office of the US Trade Representative, 1992Highlights of the North American Free Trade AgreementOffice of the US Trade Representative, 600 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20506
47.
OteroM, 1993, “The role of governments and private institutions in addressing the informal sector”, in Contrapunto: The Informal Sector Debate in Latin America Ed. RakowskiC A (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) forthcoming
48.
PeattieL, 1987, “An idea in good currency and how it grew: The informal sector”World Development15851–860
49.
PelzmanJSchoepfleG, 1988, “The impact of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act on Caribbean nations' exports and development”Economic Development and Cultural Change36753–796
50.
PioreMSabelC, 1984The Second Industrial Divide (Basic Books, New York)
51.
PortesACastellsMBentonL, 1989The Informal Economy (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
52.
PredA, 1986Place, Practice and Structure (Polity Press, Cambridge)
53.
RandallJ, 1992, “Household-based businesses: A vital link between informal production and formal production in advanced economies”, paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the AAG, San Diego, CA; copy available from the author, Department of Geography, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon
54.
RanisGFeiJ, 1961, “A theory of economic development”American Economic Review51533–565
55.
ReesJ, 1992, “Regional development policy under turbulence”Progress in Human Geography16223–231
56.
RobinsonD, 1989, “Latin America”, in Geography in America Eds GaileGWilmottC (Merrill, Columbus, OH) pp 488–505
57.
RostowWW, 1968The Stages of Economic Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
58.
SaidE, 1979Orientalism (Vintage Books, New York)
59.
SassenS, 1991The Global City (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
60.
Sassen-KoobS, 1989, “New York City's informal economy”, in The Informal Economy Eds PortesACastellsMBentonL (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 60–77
61.
SayerA, 1989, “The ‘new’ regional geography and problems of narrative”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space7253–276
62.
ScarpaciJ, 1990, “Medical care, welfare state, and deindustrialization in the Southern Cone”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space8191–210
63.
SchmitzH, 1990, “Flexible specialization in Third World industry: Prospect and research requirements”, discussion paper, International Institute for Labor Studies, Geneva
64.
SchoenbergerE, 1990, “US manufacturing investments in Western Europe: Markets, corporate strategy and the competitive environment”Annals of the Association of American Geographers80379–393
65.
ScottJ, 1990, “Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism”, in Conflicts in Feminism Eds HirschMFox-KellerE (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York) pp 134–148
66.
StaeheliLLawsonV, 1992, “Feminism and the practice of geography” Geographical Analysis forthcoming Stepick A, 1989, “Miami's two informal sectors”, in The Informal Economy Eds PortesACastellsMBentonL (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 111–134
67.
StorperM, 1983, “Who benefits from industrial decentralization? Social power in the labour market, income distribution and spatial policy in Brazil”Regional Studies18143–164
68.
StorperM, 1991Industrialization, Economic Development, and the Regional Question in the Third World (Pion, London)
69.
The Economist1989, “A survey of the Third World: Poor man's burden”, 23 September, pp 3–58
70.
TodaroMP, 1985Economic Development in the Third World (Longman, New York)
71.
ValenzuelaJSValenzuelaA, 1981, “Modernization and dependency: Alternative perspectives in the study of Latin American underdevelopment”, in From Dependency to Development: Strategies to Overcome Underdevelopment and Inequality Ed. MunozH (Westview, Boulder, CO) pp 15–41
72.
WardPM, 1993, “The Latin American inner city: Differences of degree or of kind?”Environment and Planning A251131–1160
73.
WolfER, 1982Europe and the People Without History (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
74.
World Eagle1992, “Latin America”World Eagle: The Monthly Social Studies Resource16(2) October, 14–16; 64 Washburn Ave., Wellesley, MA 02181
