The attitudinal determinants of intention to participate in planning for water allocation were assessed among residents of Jandakot, Western Australia. An expectancy-value attitudinal model was developed to assess the relationship between intention to participate and (a) attitudes towards the process of public involvement, (b) subjective norms, and (c) attitudes towards possible outcomes of involvement. It was hypothesised that other attitudinal variables associated with intention to participate would be mediated through these variables. The model was tested against alternative explanatory variables including centrality, self efficacy, political efficacy, and moral norms. Regression analyses indicated that behavioural intention was best predicted by centrality, attitudes towards the process, and subjective norms. Thus the model was not wholly supported. The results are discussed in terms of the development of the theory of centrality and the roles of process and outcome in the evaluation of regional versus neighbourhood public-involvement programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AitkenM A, 1974, “Simultaneous inference and the choice of variable subsets in multiple regression”Technometrics16221–227
2.
AjzenI, 1987, “Attributes, traits and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology301–63
3.
AjzenIFishbeinM, 1980Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
4.
BanduraA, 1977, “Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change”Psychological Review84191–215
5.
BarberB, 1984Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
6.
BentlerP MSpeckartG, 1979, “An evaluation of attitude-behavior relations”Psychological Review86452–464
7.
CampbellAGurinGMillerW E, 1954The Voter Decides (Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL)
8.
ConverseP E, 1970, “Attitudes and non attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue”, in The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems Ed. TufteE R (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) pp 168–189
FishbeinMAjzenI, 1975Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
11.
GranG, 1983Development by People: Citizen Construction of a Just World (Praeger, New York)
12.
HeberleinT A, 1972, “The land ethic realised: Some social psychological explanations for changing environmental attitudes”Journal of Social Issues2879–87
13.
HeberleinT A, 1981, “Environmental attitudes”Zeitschrift für Umwelt Politik4241–270
14.
HenigJ, 1982Neighbourhood Mobilization: Redevelopment and Response (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ)
15.
Jandakot Groundwater Study Group, 1986, “Working paper on ground water management in the Jandakot area”, Western Australian Water Resources Council, John Tonkin Water Centre, 629 Newcastle Street, Leederville, WA 6007
16.
JuddC MKrosnickJ A, 1982, “Attitude centrality, organization and measurement”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology42436–447
17.
KantolaS JSymeG JCampbellN A, 1982, “The role of individual differences and external variables in a test of the sufficiency of Fishbein's model to explain behavioral intentions to conserve water”Journal of Applied Social Psychology1270–83
18.
KantolaS JSymeG JCampbellN A, 1984, “Cognitive dissonance and energy conservation”Journal of Applied Social Psychology46416–421
19.
KantolaS JSymeG JNesdaleA R, 1983, “An informational analysis incorporating Fishbein's model in a test of the effects of appraised severity and efficacy in promoting water conservation”Journal of Applied Social Psychology13164–182
20.
KatzJ, 1985, “The role of behavioral intentions in the prediction of behavior”Journal of Social Psychology125149–155
21.
LindE ATylerT R, 1988The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Plenum, New York)
22.
MacphersonD KSymeG J, 1989, “Social investigation of allocation policy for the Jankadot PWSA”, Western Australian Water Resources Council, John Tonkin Water Centre, 629 Newcastle Street, Leederville, Perth, WA 6007
23.
ManzoL CWeinsteinN D, 1987, “Behavioral commitment to environmental protection: A study of active and nonactive members of the Sierra Club”Environment and Behavior19673–694
24.
MarksGvon WinterfeldtD, 1984, “Not in my back yard: Influence of motivational concerns on judgments about risky technology”Journal of Applied Psychology69408–415
25.
NancarrowB ESymeG J, 1989, “Improving communication with the public on water industry policy issues”, RR6, Urban Water Research Association of Australia, Melbourne
26.
NunnallyJ C, 1978Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York)
27.
NuttinJ, 1985Future Time Perspective and Motivation (Leuven University Press, Leuven; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ)
28.
OliverP, 1984, “If you don't do it, nobody else will: Active and token contributors to local collective action”American Sociological Review49601–610
29.
PeattieL, 1968, “Reflections on advocacy planning”Journal of the American Institute of Planners3480–88
30.
PetersenK KDuttonJ E, 1975, “Centrality, extremity, intensity: Neglected variables in research on attitude-behavior consistency”Social Forces54393–414
31.
PotterH RNorvilleH J, 1979, “Perceptions of effective public participation in water resources decision making”, TR115, University Water Resources Research Center, Purdue
32.
PrestbyJ EWandersmanA, 1985, “An empirical exploration of a framework of organizational viability: Maintaining block organizations”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science21287–305
RichR C, 1980, “The dynamics of leadership in neighbourhood organizations”Social Science Quarterly60570–587
35.
SchumanHPresserS, 1981Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Content (Academic Press, New York)
36.
SchwartzS, 1975, “The justice of need and the activation of humanitarian norms”Journal of Social Issues31111–136
37.
SeligmanCHuttonR B, 1981, “Evaluating energy conservation programs”Journal of Social Issues3751–72
38.
SmithD H, 1975, “Voluntary action in voluntary groups”Annual Review of Sociology1247–270
39.
TylerT RLindE A, 1990, “Intrinsic versus community-based justice models: When does group membership matter?”Journal of Social Issues4683–94
40.
van LiereK DDunlapR E, 1978, “Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz's norm-activation model to yard burning”Journal of Applied Social Psychology8174–188
41.
VerhallenT M MPietersR G M, 1984, “Attitude theory and behavioral costs”Journal of Economic Psychology5233–249
42.
WandersmanA, 1979, “User participation: A study of types of participation, effects, mediators, and individual differences”Environment and Behavior11185–208
43.
WandersmanA, 1981, “A framework of participation in community organizations”Journal of Applied Behavioral Science1727–58
44.
WandersmanAGiamartinoG, 1980, “Community and individual difference characteristics as influences on initial participation”American Journal of Community Psychology8217–228
45.
WandersmanAFlorinPFriedmannRMeierR, 1987, “Who participates, who does not and why: An analysis of voluntary neighbourhood organizations in the United States and Israel”Sociological Forum2534–555
