The debate over the notion of ‘flexibility’ has centred around evidence from a small number of industrial sectors. In this paper, the petrochemicals industry is examined for evidence of a shift towards flexibility. It is concluded that there is evidence of both a move towards flexible production and organisation and a move towards the retention of commodity production. In so doing, three problems in the flexibility argument are dealt with; the breakup of mass markets, the potential for small firms, and the engineering-derived nature of the approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchilladelisBSchwartzkopfACinesM, 1990, “The dynamics of technological innovation: The case of the chemical industry”Research Policy191–34
2.
AgliettaM, 1979A Theory of Capitalist Regulation (New Left Books, London)
3.
AminARobinsK, 1989, “Industrial districts and regional development: Limits and possibilities”, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne
4.
APPE, 1989Petrochemicals: The Key to European High Technology (Association of Petrochemical Producers in Europe, 250 Avenue Louise, PO Box 71, B-1050, Brussels)
5.
AtkinsonJ, 1984, “Manpower strategies for flexible organisations”Personnel Management (August) 28–31
6.
AtkinsonJ, 1985, “Flexibility: Planning for an uncertain future”Manpower Policy and Practice1(Summer) 26–29
BlackburnPCoombsRGreenK, 1985Technology, Economic Growth and the Labour Process (Macmillan, London)
9.
CEDC, 1984The New Petrochemical Producers and Their Prospective Impact on Europe and the UK (Chemicals Economic Development Committee, National Economic Development Office, 21 Millbank, London SW1)
10.
ChristophersonS, 1989, “Flexibility in the US service economy and the emerging spatial division of labour”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers14131–143
11.
CookeP, 1988, “Flexible integration, scope economies, and strategic alliances: Social and spatial mediations”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6281–300
12.
European Chemical News1988a, “ECPA debate rings investment alarm bells”, 3 October, page 12
13.
European Chemical News1988b, “Packaging opens new era for plastics”, 31 October, page 10
14.
European Chemical News1989a, “Speciality Chemicals Special Supplement”, 23 January
15.
European Chemical News1989b, “Shell boosts fluorine stake”, 3 April, page 4
16.
European Chemical News1989c, “Speciality Chemicals Supplement”, 24 April
17.
European Chemical News1990, “IBIS to fold?”, 10 September, page 4
18.
FayadMMotamenH, 1986Economics of the Petrochemical Industry (Frances Pinter, London)
19.
Financial Times1988, “Biotechnology prescription for Monsanto”, 8 December, page 17
20.
Financial Times1989a, “The plastic car gathers speed”, 21 February, page 22
21.
Financial Times1989b, “Paints and coatings: The war for world markets”, Financial Times Survey of Paints and Coatings, 10 March, page 1
22.
Financial Times1989c, “Merck and Johnson join hands”, 30 March, page 7
23.
Financial Times1989d, “In the grip of takeover fever”, 4 April, page 13
24.
Financial Times1989e, “A positive fusion catches the rising tide”, 21 April, page 30
25.
Financial Times1989f, “Contrasting performances by US chemicals groups”, 25 April, page 23
26.
Financial Times1989g, “Seeds of doubt in agrochemicals”, 5 May, page 18
27.
Financial Times1989h, “In search of a niche to dominate”, Financial Times Survey of the Chemical Industry, 13 July, page 11
FreemanC, 1982The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Frances Pinter, London)
31.
GertlerM, 1988, “The limits to flexibility: Comments on the post-Fordist vision of production and its geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers13419–432
32.
GertlerM, 1989, “Resurrecting flexibility? A reply to Schoenberger”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers14109–112
33.
HarveyD, 1987, “Flexible accumulation through urbanisation: Reflections on ‘post-modernism’ in the American city”Antipode19260–286
34.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Postmodernity (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
35.
HarveyDScottA, 1988, “The practice of human geography: Theory and empirical specificity in the transition from Fordism to flexible accumulation”, in Remodelling Geography Ed. MacMillanW D (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 217–229
36.
HeatonC, 1986The Chemical Industry (Blackie, Glasgow)
HudsonR, 1983, “Capital accumulation and chemicals production in Western Europe in the postwar period”Environment and Planning A15105–122
39.
HudsonR, 1989, “Labour-market changes and new forms of work in old industrial regions: Maybe flexibility for some but not flexible accumulation”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space75–30
40.
Hydrocarbon Processing1988, “Special report on instrumentation and control”. 67(6) 47–57
41.
Hydrocarbon Processing1989, “Special report on process control”68(7) 51–118
42.
Hydrocarbon Processing1990a, “Catalysts: A special report”69(2) 53–68
43.
Hydrocarbon Processing1990b, “Heat transfer: A special report”69(9) 39–50
44.
LeborgneDLipietzA, 1988, “New technologies, new modes of regulation: Some spatial implications”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6263–280
45.
LipietzA, 1986, “New tendencies in the international division of labour: Regimes of accumulation and modes of regulation”, in Production, Work, Territory Eds ScottAStorperM (Allen and Unwin, London) pp 16–40
46.
MurrayF, 1987, “Flexible specialisation in the Third Italy”Capital and Class3384–95
47.
PinchSMasonCWittS, 1989, “Labour flexibility and industrial restructuring in the UK ‘Sunbelt’: The case of Southampton”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers14418–434
48.
PioreM, 1986, “Perspectives on labour market flexibility”Industrial Relations25146–166
49.
PioreMSabelC, 1984The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (Basic Books, New York)
50.
PollertA, 1988, “Dismantling flexibility”Capital and Class3442–75
51.
RuberyJTarlingRWilkinsonF, 1987, “Flexibility, marketing and the organisation of production”Labour and Society12131–151
52.
SabelC, 1989, “Flexible specialisation and the re-emergence of regional economies”, in Reversing Industrial Decline? Industrial Structure and Policy in Britain and Her Competitors Eds HirstPZeitlinJ (Berg, Leamington Spa, Warwicks) pp 17–69
53.
SayerA, 1989, “Post-Fordism in question”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research13666–693
54.
SchoenbergerE, 1987, “Technological and organisational change in automobile production: Spatial implications”Regional Studies21199–214
55.
SchoenbergerE, 1988, “From Fordism to flexible accumulation: Technology, competitive strategies, and international location”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6245–262
56.
SchoenbergerE, 1989, “Thinking about flexibility: A response to Gertler”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers1498–108
57.
ScottA, 1988, “Flexible production systems and regional development: The rise of new industrial spaces in North America and Europe”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12171–186
58.
Shelegraph1989, “Who's who at Stanlow”, Shell in-house journal, 21 April, pp 6–7
59.
SpitzP, 1988Petrochemicals: The Rise of an Industry (John Wiley, New York)
60.
StorperMScottA, 1989, “The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes”, in The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life Eds WolchJDearM (Allan and Unwin, Winchester, MA) pp 21–40
61.
TeeceD, 1980, “Economies of scope and scope of enterprise”Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation1223–248
62.
WiliamsKCutlerTWilliamsJHaslamC, 1987, “The end of mass production?”Economy and Society16405–439
63.
ZeitlinJ, 1985, “Markets, technology and collective services: A strategy for local government intervention in the London clothing industry”Strategy for the London Clothing Industry: A Debate (Greater London Council, London); copy available from Centre for Local Economic Strategies, Alberton House, St Mary's Parsonage, Manchester M3 2WJ
