The development of high-technology manufacturing concentrations has attracted extensive research, but few studies have provided evidence on the genesis of regional agglomerations of software industry. In this paper findings from a survey of 152 software firms in Washington State are presented. As in US industry data, the majority of these software companies are relatively small and new organizations within the State. Results on company location and formation decisions and on international activities show that the software industry has been generated primarily by local entrepreneurs and relies on US suppliers and customers. State government and academic research programs have not affected the growth of the software industry, but over time, industry expansion has produced leading US software corporations, such as the Microsoft Corporation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArossaL, 1988, “Software and computer services”The OECD Observer15113–16
2.
BeyersWBAlvineMJJohnsenEG, 1985The Service Economy: Export of Services in the Central Puget Sound RegionCentral Puget Sound Economic Development District, 216 First Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98104
3.
BirchDL, 1987Job Creation in America (The Free Press, New York)
4.
BrainardSG, 1985A View of Washington's Business Climate as Seen by High Technology ExecutivesWashington State Department of Trade and Economic Development, 101 General Administration Building, Olympia, WA 98504
5.
BrehenyMJMcQuaidRW, 1987The Development of High Technology Industries: An International Survey (Croom Helm, Andover, Hants)
6.
BrowneLE, 1983, “High technology and business services”New England Economic Review (July–August) 5–17
7.
BuellB, 1990, “He co-founded microsoft and now, for an encore”Business Week 21 May, page 154
8.
CastellsM (Ed.), 1985aUrban Affairs Annual Reviews 28: High Technology, Space, and Society (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)
9.
CastellsM, 1985b, “High technology, economic restructuring, and the urban — regional process in the United States”, in Urban Affairs Annual Reviews 28: Technology, Space, and Society Ed. CastellsM (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 11–40
10.
ChaseRA1990, “Computer software: An infant industry becomes a regional leader”Pacific Northwest Executive69–11
11.
ChaseRAInveenDC, 1989An Economic Assessment of the Washington State Software Services IndustryWashington State Department of Trade and Economic Development, 101 General Administration Building, Olympia, WA 98504
12.
ClarkGGertlerMWhitemanJ, 1986Regional Dynamics: Studies in Adjustment Theory (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA)
13.
ColeI, 1990, “Microsoft's offshore manufacturing”, lecture to the Western Washington University Department of Management, 19 January, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA; available from author
14.
ColeRDivelyDMorrisFSchillingAHShenE, 1984High Technology Employment, Education, and Training in Washington StateBattelle Research Center, 4000 NE 41st Street, Seattle, WA 98105
15.
CooperAC, 1986, “Entrepreneurship and high technology”, in The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship Eds SextonDLSmilorRW (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) pp 153–168
16.
DivelyD, 1985Definition of High Technology in Washington StateWashington State Department of Trade and Economic Development, 101 General Administration Building, Olympia, WA 98504
17.
DivelyD, 1987Overview of the Washington Software IndustryWashington Software Association, PO Box 8364, Kirkland, WA 98034
18.
EDPW, 1989Advanced Technology in Washington State: 1989 Directory Economic Development Partnership for Washington (Commerce Publishing, Seattle, WA)
19.
FergusonCH, 1988, “From the people who bought you voodoo economics”Harvard Business Review6655–62
20.
FloridaRKenneyM, 1990, “High-technology restructuring in the USA and Japan”Environment and Planning A22233–252
21.
GalbraithCS, 1985, “High-technology location and development: The case of Orange county”California Management Review2898–109
22.
GalbraithCSDeNobleAF, 1988, “Location decisions by high-technology firms: A comparison of firm size, industry type, and institutional form”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice1331–47
23.
GandiaDM, 1983Defining High TechMaryland Department of Economic and Community Development, Baltimore, MD
24.
GertlerMS, 1987, “Capital, technology and industry dynamics in regional development”Urban Geography8251–263
25.
GlasmeierA, 1988, “Factors governing the development of high technology industry agglomerations: A tale of three cities”Regional Studies22287–301
26.
GrunbaumR, 1990, “Asymetrix will unveil its long-secret software this week”Puget Sound Business Journal11 21 May, page 17
27.
HallPMarkusenAOsbornRWachsmanB, 1985, “The American computer software industry: Economic development prospects”, in Silicon Landscapes Eds HallPMarkusenA (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA) pp 49–64
28.
HowellsJ, 1987, “Developments in the location, technology and industrial organization of computer services: Some trends and research issues”Regional Studies21493–503
29.
KeebleDE, 1989, “High-technology industry and regional development in Britain: The case of the Cambridge phenomenon”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy7153–172
30.
LangL, 1989, “Puget Sound's top 25 software developers”Puget Sound Business Journal10 10 July, page 20
31.
MaleckiEJ, 1984, “High technology and local economic development”Journal of the American Planning Association50262–269
32.
MaleckiEJ, 1985, “Industrial location and corporate organization in high technology industries”Economic Geography61345–369
33.
MaliziaEE, 1985, “The locational attractiveness of the southeast to high-technology manufacturers”, in High Hopes for High Tech Ed. WhittingtonD (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC) pp 173–190
34.
MarkusenAHallPGlasmeierA, 1986High Tech America (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA)
35.
MarshallJ, 1985, “Business services, the regions and regional policy”Regional Studies19353–363
36.
Microsoft Corporation, 1989Annual ReportInvestor Relations Department, Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA98052–6399
37.
MilburnK, 1989, “Software industry charges to a: New plateau”Puget Sound Business Journal10 5 June, pages 1 and 12
38.
NortonRReesJ, 1979, “The product cycle and the decentralization of American manufacturing”Regional Studies13141–151
39.
OakeyR, 1984High Technology Small Firms: Regional Development in Britain and the United States (St Martin's Press, New York)
40.
OakeyRPCooperSY, 1989, “High technology industry, agglomeration and the potential for peripherally sited small firms”Regional Studies23347–360
41.
OakeyRPRothwellR, 1986, “High technology small firms and regional industrial growth”, in Technological Change, Industrial Restructuring, and Regional Development Eds AminAGoddardJ (Unwin Hyman, London) pp 258–283
42.
PremusR, 1982Location of High Technology Firms and Regional Economic Development (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
43.
PremusR, 1988, “US technology policies and their regional effects”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy6441–448
44.
SaxenianA, 1985, “Silicon Valley and Route 128: Regional prototypes or historic exceptions?”, in Urban Affairs Annual Reviews 28: High Technology, Space, and Society Ed. CastellsM (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 81–105
45.
SchoenbergerE, 1988, “From Fordism to flexible accumulation: Technology, competitive strategies, and international location”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6245–262
46.
SchwareR, 1987, “Software industry development in the Third World: Policy guidelines, institutional options, and constraints”World Development151249–1267
47.
ScottAJStorperM, 1987, “High technology industry and regional development: A theoretical critique and reconstruction”International Social Science Journal39215–232
48.
SenkerJ, 1985, “Small high technology firms: Some regional implications”Technovation3243–262
49.
SpilkerJStrudwickK, 1988Northwest High Tech (Resolution Press, Bellevue, WA)
50.
StohrWB, 1986, “Regional innovation complexes”Papers of the Regional Science Association5929–44
51.
StorperM, 1987, “The new industrial geography, 1985–1986”Urban Geography8585–598
52.
ThompsonC, 1989, “High-technology theories and public policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy7121–152
53.
USBC, 1984–1988County Business Patterns for various states, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
54.
USSEC, 1986Microsoft Corporation: Form 10-KUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC; available from Investor Relations Department, Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052–6399
55.
USSEC, 1987Microsoft Corporation: Form 10-KUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC; available from Investor Relations Department, Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052–6399
56.
USSEC, 1988Microsoft Corporation: Form 10-KUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC; available from Investor Relations Department, Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052–6399
57.
USSEC, 1989Microsoft Corporation: Form 10-KUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC; available from Investor Relations Department, Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052–6399
58.
VinsonRHarringtonP, 1979Defining High Technology Industries in MassachusettsDepartment of Manpower Development, Boston, MA
59.
WalkerRA, 1985a, “Technological determination and determinism: Industrial growth and location”, in Urban Affairs Annual Reviews 28: High Technology, Space, and Society Ed. CastellsM (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 226–264
60.
WalkerRA, 1985b, “Is there a service economy? The changing capitalist division of labor”Science and Society4942–83
61.
WattsH, 1987Industrial Geography (John Wiley, New York)
62.
WSA, 19891990 Washington State Software Industry DirectoryWashington Software Association, PO Box 8364, Kirkland, WA 98034
63.
WSB, 1987Washington State Software Industry DirectoryWashington Software Board, Seattle, WA; available from Washington Software Association, PO Box 8364, Kirkland, WA 98034
64.
WSDR, 1988Tax Statistics 1988Washington State Department of Revenue, Research Section, General Administration Building, Olympia, WA 98504
