In 1985, after being represented by the United Automobile Workers union (UAW) for almost half a century, Canadian autoworkers split from the International Union to form their own independent union, the CAW. To date, most interpretations have attributed the split to political, cultural, and ideological differences between the US and Canadian sections of the union. Through an analysis of restructuring and collective bargaining in the North American automobile industry, it is argued in this paper that the split in the UAW was rooted in the tensions that arose over the different, and increasingly incompatible, bargaining agendas and strategies adopted by the Canadian and US sections of the union during the 1980s. The analysis shows that these differences in strategy resulted primarily from the geographically uneven effects of the significant restructuring which was taking place in the North American automobile industry during this period.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltshulerAAndersonMJonesDRoosDWomackJ, 1984The Future of the Automobile: The Report of MIT's International Automobile Program (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
2.
Auto-in-Michigan Project Newsletter, 1987, 2 (2) March (Transportation Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI)
3.
BenedictD, 1985, “The 1984 GM agreement in Canada: Significance and consequences”Relations Industrielles40(1) 27–45
4.
BenteneauM, 1984, “Our labor ‘hero’ talking on US ‘bullies’”Windsor Star 8 December, page A3
5.
BoyerR, 1988, “Wage/Labour relations, growth and crisis: A hidden dialectic”, in The Search for Labour Market Flexibility Ed. BoyerR (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 3–25
6.
Canada, Department of Regional Industrial Expansion, 1987Report on the Canadian Automotive Industry in 1985 (Department of Regional Idustrial Expansion, Ottawa)
7.
Canada, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, 1988Report on the Canadian Automotive Industry in 1987 (Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Ottawa)
8.
ClarkG, 1986, “Restructuring the U.S. economy: The NLRB, the Saturn Project, and economic justice”Economic Geography62(4) 289–306
9.
ClimenhagaD, 1988a, “Canada's auto output to grow amid overcapacity”Globe and Mail 8 July, page B1
10.
ClimenhagaD, 1988b, “CAW to represent CAMI plant's ‘team players’”Globe and Mail 8 November, page 4
11.
CrispoJ, 1984, “White driving a risky route for workers”Globe and Mail 10 December, page 7
12.
Detroit Free Press1984, “UAW breach may cause jobs to shift from Canada”, 12 December page 1A
13.
DeverellJ, 1984, “Bad weather ahead for Canadian auto workers”Toronto Star 12 December, page A5
14.
FriedmanS, 1989, “Discussion: IR developments in U.S. and Canada”Proceedings of the 41st. Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (IRRA, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) pp 288–293
15.
GindinS, 1989, “Breaking away: The formation of the Canadian Auto Workers”Studies in Political Economy2963–89
16.
Globe and Mail1982, “Match U.S. terms, automaker says: May leave Canada, GM warns union” 1 September, page 1
17.
Globe and Mail1984, “Union split seen threatening investment here”, 12 December, page B1
18.
GwynR, 1984, “Canadianized unions can better represent their members”Toronto Star 13 December, page A4
19.
HolmesJ, 1983, “Industrial reorganization, capital restructuring and locational change: An analysis of the Canadian automobile industry in the 1960s”Economic Geography59251–271
20.
HolmesJ, 1987a, “The crisis of Fordism and the restructuring of the Canadian auto industry”, in Frontyard/Backyard: The Americas in the Global Crisis Eds HolmesJLeysC (Between the Lines Press, Toronto) pp 95–129
21.
HolmesJ, 1987b, “Technical change and the restructuring of the North American automobile industry”, in Technical Change and Industrial Policy Eds ChapmanKHumphrysG (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 121–156
22.
HolmesJ, 1988, “Industrial restructuring in a period of crisis: An analysis of the Canadian automobile industry, 1973–83”Antipode20(1) 19–51
23.
HolmesJ, 1989, “New production technologies, labour and the North American auto industry”, in Labour, Environment and Industrial Change Eds LingeGJRvan der KnaapG A (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants) pp 87–106
24.
HolmesJLeysC, 1987, “Introduction: Frontyard/Backyard”, in Frontyard/Backyard: The Americas in the Global Crisis Eds HolmesJLeysC (Between the Lines Press, Toronto) pp 3–22
25.
HolushaJ, 1984, “For disunited auto workers, solidarity stops at the border”New York Times 16 December, page 5
26.
HorowitzG, 1968Canadian Labour in Politics (University of Toronto Press, Toronto)
27.
HowardRScottJ, 1972, “International unions and the ideology of class collaboration”, in Capitalism and the National Question in Canada Ed TeepleG (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) pp 67–88
28.
HyclakTKolchinM, 1989, “The drive for autonomy by Canadian auto workers”Proceedings of the 41st. Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (IRRA, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) pp 265–271
JefferysS, 1986Management and Managed: Fifty Years of Crisis at Chrysler (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
31.
KatzHC, 1985Shifting Gears: Changing Labour Relations in the U.S. Automobile Industry (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
32.
KatzHC, 1986, “Recent developments in U.S. auto labour relations”, in The Automobile Industry and Its Workers: Between Fordism and Flexibility Eds TollidaySZeitlinJ (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 282–304
33.
KatzHC, 1987, “New developments in union structure in the U.S. auto industry”Proceedings of the 39th. Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (IRRA, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) pp 112–120
34.
KettlerDStruthersJHuxleyC, 1986, “Unionization and labour regimes: A comparison between Canada and the United States since 1945” unpublished paper; available from D Kettler, Department of Political Science, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario
35.
KochanTA, 1988, “Adaptability of the U.S. industrial relations system”Science240287–292
36.
KochanTAKatzHCMcKersieRB, 1986The Transformation of American Industrial Relations (Basic Books, New York)
37.
KrafcikJ, 1987Trends in International Automotive Assembly Practice (International Motor Vehicle Program, MIT, Cambridge, MA)
38.
KumarP, 1987, “Changing labour relations in the Auto industry: A case study of General Motors of Canada” unpublished report; available from P Kumar, School of Industrial Relations, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
39.
KumarPRyanD (Eds.), 1988Canadian Union Movement in the 1980s: Perspectives From Union Leaders Research and Current Issues Series No. 53, Industrial Relations Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
LewchukW, 1987American Technology and the British Vehicle Industry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
42.
LipietzA, 1986Miracles and Mirages: The Crises of Global Fordism (Verso, London)
43.
ListW, 1984, “Automakers concerned by UAW split”Globe and Mail 12 December, page 4
44.
LuriaD, 1986, “New labor-management models from Detroit?”Harvard Business Review September/October, 22–29
45.
MassingM, 1988, “Detroit's strange bedfellows”New York Times Magazine 1 February, page 20
46.
National Film Board of Canada, 1986, “Final Offer” transcript
47.
PalmerB, 1980Working-Class Experience: The Rise and Reconstitution of Canadian Labour (Butterworth, Toronto)
48.
PanitchL, 1985, “Founding the UAW Canada”Canadian Dimension19(5) 46–48
49.
PerusekG, 1989, “The U.S.-Canada split in the United Automobile Workers”Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association (IRRA, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) pp 272–278
50.
ResnickP, 1977The Land of Cain: Class and Nationalism in Canada, 1945–1975 (New Star Books, Vancouver)
51.
RoseJChaisonG, 1985, “The state of the unions: United States and Canada”Journal of Labor Research6(1) 97–111
52.
RusonikA, 1988The Split of the United Auto Workers: A Clash of Ideologies or Conflicting Economic Interests unpublished MA Thesis, Department of Political Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
53.
ScottJ, 1978Canadian Workers, American Unions (New Star Books, Vancouver)
54.
SlaughterJ, 1981, “UAW's Fraser: ‘this is the worst economic settlement in years’”Labor Notes 27 January, pages 8–9
55.
SlaughterJ, 1982a, “Canadian UAW strikes Chrysler, U.S. bargainers return to the table”Labor Notes 23 November, page 3
Toronto Sun, 1984, “Mighty mouse” (editorial), 14 December, page 6
58.
UAW Canadian Region, 1984Excerpts from UAW Director Robert White's Report to the Canadian UAW Council”, December 1, 1984 (UAW, Canadian Region, Willowdale, Ontario)
59.
Wall Street Journal, 1982, “GM workers' narrow vote for concessions might hinder further cost cuts at plants” 12 April, page 1
60.
WatkinsM, 1973, “The trade union movement in Canada”, in Canada Limited Ed. LaxerR (McClelland and Stewart, Toronto) pp 178–196
61.
WellsD, 1988, “Final Offer”Radical History Review4082–87
62.
WhiteR, 1987Hard Bargains: My Life on the Line (McClelland and Stewart, Toronto)
63.
Windsor Star, 1984, “Experts say UAW split could hurt us”, 4 December, page A1
64.
WoodwardJ, 1980, “New Chrysler pact creating divisions in auto union”Labor Notes 24 January, page 8
