Efforts to ‘operationalize’ a concept of sustainability into appraisal methods for practical decisionmaking have been few and generally unpersuasive. In this paper it is argued that this need not be the case if a set of environmentally compensating, or ‘shadow’, projects within an overall portfolio are used to ensure a sustainability objective of setting a constraint on the depletion and degradation of the stock of natural capital. This can be achieved through both a ‘weak’ and a ‘strong’ sustainability criterion. In both cases the resulting optimum differs from the efficient optimum of the conventional cost-benefit criterion, but the basic cost-benefit model remains intact.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarbierE B, 1988, “Economic valuation of environmental impacts”Project Appraisal3143–150
2.
BishopR, 1978, “Endangered species and uncertainty: The economics of a safe minimum standard”American Journal of Agricultural Economics6010–13
3.
DasguptaP SMarglinSSenA, 1972Guidelines for Project Evaluation (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna)
4.
IUCN, 1980World Conservation StrategyInternational Union for Conservation of Nature, 1196 Gland, Switzerland
KulaE, 1984, “Derivation of social time preference rates for the United States and Canada”Quarterly Journal of Economics99873–882
7.
KulaE, 1985, “An empirical investigation on the social time-preference rate for the United Kingdom”Environment and Planning A17199–212
8.
LittleI M DMirrleesJ, 1974Project Appraisal and Planning for Developing Countries (William Heinemann, London)
9.
MalerK-G, 1989, “Sustainable development”, mimeograph, available from Economic Development Institute, World Bank, Washington, DC
10.
MarkandyaAPearceD W, 1988a, “Natural environments and the social rate of discount”Project Appraisal32–12
11.
MarkandyaAPearceD W, 1988b, “Environmental considerations and the choice of discount rate in developing countries”, WP-3, Environment Department, World Bank, Washington, DC
12.
PageT, 1977Conservation and Economic Efficiency (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
PearceD WBarbierE BMarkandyaA, 1988Sustainable Development and Cost Benefit Analysis LEEC paper 88-03, joint study by International Institute for Environment and Development and University College London; available from London Environmental Economics Centre (LEEC), 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H ODD
17.
PearceD WBarbierE BMarkandyaA, 1990Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World (Edward Elgar, Aldershot, Hants) forthcoming
18.
RepettoR, 1986World Enough and Time (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
19.
SagoffM, 1988The Economy of the Earth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
20.
SolowR, 1986, “On the intergenerational allocation of natural resources”Scandinavian Journal of Economics88(1) 141–149
21.
WarfordJ JPearceD W, 1990Environment and Development mimeograph, forthcoming; available from author
22.
WCED, 1987Our Common FutureWorld Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
