• References presented at the 36th North American Meeting of the Regional Science Association, Santa Barbara, November 1989.
2.
FotheringhamA S, 1981, “Spatial structure and the parameters of spatial interaction models”Annals, Association of American Geographers71425–436
3.
FotheringhamA S, 1983a, “A new set of spatial-interaction models: The theory of competing destinations”Environment and Planning A1515–36
4.
FotheringhamA S, 1983b, “Some theoretical aspects of destination choice and their relevance to production-constrained gravity models”Environment and Planning A151121–1132
5.
FotheringhamA S, 1986, “Modelling hierarchical destination choice”Environment and Planning A18401–418
6.
• GetisA, 1989, “Spatial interaction and correlation: A cross product approach”, copy available from the author at Department of Geography, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL
7.
• GriffithD A, 1989, “Spatial autocorrelation and spatial interaction”, copy available from the author at Department of Geography, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY
8.
HaagG, 1986, “A stochastic theory for residential and labour mobility including travel networks”, in Technological Change, Employment and Spatial Dynamics Ed. NijkampP (Springer, Berlin) pp 340–357
9.
• HaynesK EFotheringhamA S, 1989, “The impact of space on the application of discrete choice models”, copy available from the first author at Department of Geography, Boston University, Boston, MA
10.
HensherD AJohnsonL W, 1981Applied Discrete Choice ModellingCroom Helm, Beckenham, Kent; John Wiley, New York)
11.
HolmbergI, 1987, “Household change and housing needs: A forecasting model”, in Family Demography Eds BungaartsJBurchTWachterK (Clarendon Press, Oxford) pp 327–341
12.
LeonardiG, 1981, “A general accessibility and congestion-sensitive multiactivity spatial interaction model”Papers of the Regional Science Association473–17
13.
LesseP F, 1982, “A phenomenological theory of socioeconomic systems with spatial interactions”Environment and Planning A14869–888
14.
LoL, 1989, “A translog approach to consumer behaviour”, to appear in Journal of Regional Science.
15.
PicklesA, 1980, “Models of movement: A review of alternative methods”Environment and Planning A121383–1404
16.
• RogersA, 1989, “Requiem for the net migrant”, copy available from the author at Population Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
17.
RoyJ R, 1985, “On forecasting choice among dependent spatial alternatives”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design12479–492
18.
RoyJ R, 1987, “An alternative information theory approach for modelling spatial interaction”Environment and Planning A19385–394
19.
RoyJ R, 1990, “Unemployment and unfilled vacancies in spatial models of job choice”, in Behavioural Modelling of Spatial Decisions and Processes Eds FisherM MNijkampPPapageorgiouY (North-Holland, Amsterdam) chapter 14, forthcoming
20.
RoyJ RLesseP F, 1981, “On appropriate microstate descriptions in entropy modelling”Transportation Research B1585–96
21.
• SmithT E, 1989, “A simple decision theory of spatial interaction: The Alonso model revisited”, copy available from Department of Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
22.
WilsonA G, 1967, “A statistical theory of spatial distribution models”Transportation Research1253–269
23.
WilsonA G, 1970Entropy in Urban and Regional ModellingPion, London)
24.
ArbiaG, 1990Spatial Data Configuration in Statistical Analysis of Regional Economic and Related ProblemsKluwer, Dordrecht)
25.
BattyMLongleyP, 1986, “The fractal simulation of urban structure”Environment and Planning A181143–1179
26.
BattyMSikdarP K, 1982, “Spatial aggregation in gravity models: 4. Generalisations and large-scale applications”Environment and Planning A14795–882
27.
BattyMLongleyPFotheringhamA S, 1989, “Urban growth and form: Scaling, fractal geometry, and diffusion-limited aggregation”Environment and Planning A211447–1472
28.
De ColaL, 1989, “Fractal analysis of a classified landsat scene” manuscript; copy available from the author
29.
FotheringhamA SWongD, 1990, “Random behaviour and the evolution of urban systems” manuscript in preparation
30.
KarlingerM RTroutmanB M, 1989, “A random spatial network model based on elementary postulates”Water Resources Research25793–798
31.
La BarberaPRossoR, 1989, “On the fractal dimension of stream networks”Water Resources Research25735–741
32.
LeopoldL BLangbeinW B, 1962, “The concept of entropy in landscape evolution”US Geological Survey Professional Papers500-A14–19
33.
NystuenJ D, 1966, “Effects of boundary shape and the concept of local convexity”, DP-10, Michigan Inter-University Community of Mathematical Geographers
34.
PerkalJ, 1966a, “On the length of empirical curves”, DP-10, Michigan Inter-University Community of Mathematical Geographers, Department of Geography, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
35.
PerkalJ, 1966b, “An attempt at objective generalization”, DP-10, Michigan Inter-University Community of Mathematical Geographers, Department of Geography, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
36.
PutmanS HChungS-H, 1989, “Effects of spatial system design on spatial interaction models. 1: The spatial system definition problem”Environment and Planning A2127–46
37.
van PeltJWoldenbergM JVerwerR W H, 1989, “Two generalized topological models of stream network growth”Journal of Geology97281–299
