Conventional choice-models are based on the assumption of a stable utility function. Previous studies have indicated that this assumption may be less valid for certain types of choice-behaviour. In this paper the idea of variety seeking is put forward as a possible explanation for varied choice-behaviour. A model is developed and tested in the context of recreational choice-behaviour.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaxterM J, 1979, “The application of logit regression analysis to production-constrained gravity models”Jounal of Regional Science191171–1177
2.
BaxterM JEwingG O, 1981, “Models of recreational trip distribution”Regional Studies15327–334
3.
DunnRWrigleyN, 1985, “Beta logistic models of urban shopping center choice”Geographical Analysis1795–113
4.
EwingG O, 1978, “The interpretation and estimation of parameters in constrained and unconstrained trip distribution models”Economic Geography54254–273
5.
FarquharR HRaoV R, 1976, “A balance model of evaluating subsets of multiattribute items”Management Science22528–539
6.
FeinbergF MMcAlisterL, 1985, “Managing market share when consumers seek variety”, working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA 02139
7.
GivonM, 1984, “Variety seeking through brand switching”Marketing Science31–22
8.
GolledgeR GTimmermansH J P (Eds), 1988Behavioural Modelling in Geography and Planning (Croom Helm, Andover, Hants)
9.
HansonS, 1980, “Spatial diversification and multipurpose travel: Implications for choice theory”Geographical Analysis12245–257
10.
JeulandA, 1978, “Brand preference over time: A partially deterministic operationalization of the notion of variety seeking”, in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions Ed. JainS (American Marketing Association, Chicago) pp 34–37
11.
LattinJ HMcAlisterL, 1985, “Using a variety seeking model to identify substitute and complementary relationships among competing products”Journal of Marketing Research22330–339
12.
McAlisterL, 1979, “Choosing multiple items from a product class”Journal of Consumer Research6213–224
13.
McAlisterL, 1982, “A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety seeking behavior”Journal of Consumer Research9141–151
14.
McAlisterL, 1984, “A similarity based Markov model of variety seeking behavior”, MIT WP-1539-84, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA
15.
McAlisterLPessemierE, 1982, “Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review”Journal of Consumer Research9311–322
16.
NakanishiMCooperL G, 1974, “Parameter estimation for a multiplicative competitive interaction model: Least squares approach”Journal of Marketing Research11303–311
17.
PessemierE A, 1985, “Varied individual behavior: Some theories, measurement and models”Multivariate Behavioral Research2069–94
18.
TimmermansH J P, 1985, “Variety seeking models and recreational choice behavior”, paper presented at the Pacific Regional Science Conference, Molokai, Hawaii, 12 – 15 August; copy available from the author
19.
TverskyA, 1977, “Features of similarity”Psychological Review84327–352
