This paper contains a consideration of the relationships between social theory, quantification, and policy in the context of changing local labour markets. It is argued that different theories have different policy implications which cannot be resolved by quantitative analysis because these various theories embody differing methodological assumptions. There is, however, a common low level of agreement over certain possible changes and tendencies in social systems and these can be probed by quantitative studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsPFreemanG, 1982, “Social services under Reagan and Thatcher”, in Urban Policy Under Capitalism Eds FainsteinN IFainsteinS SSage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 65–82
2.
AlthauserR PKallebergA L, 1981, “Firms, occupations, and the structure of labour markets: A conceptual analysis”, in Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets Eds AlthauserR PKallebergA LAcademic Press, New York) pp 119–149
3.
AmsdenH A, 1980The Economics of Women and Work (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
4.
AtkinsonJ, 1985, “The changing corporation”, in New Patterns of Work Ed. ClutterbuckDGower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 13–35
5.
AtkinsonJGregoryD, 1986, “A flexible future: Britain's dual labour force”Marxism Today April issue, pages 12–17
6.
BeckE MHoranP MTolbertC M, 1978, “Stratification in a dual economy: A sectoral model of earnings determination”American Sociological Review43704–720
7.
BeckerG, 1964Human Capital (Columbia University Press, New York)
8.
BergI, 1981Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets (Academic Press, New York)
9.
BlackburnR MMannM, 1979The Working Class in the Labour Market (Macmillan, London)
BuckNGordonIYoungK, 1986The London Employment Problem (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
12.
CainG, 1976, “The challenge of segmented labour market theories to orthodox theory”Journal of Economic Literature141215–1257
13.
CookeP, 1983Theories of Planning and Spatial Development (Hutchinson, London)
14.
CraigCRuberyJTarlingRWilkinsonF, 1985, “Economic, social and political factors in the operation of labour markets”, in New Approaches to Economic Life Eds RobertsBFinneganRGallieDManchester University Press, Manchester) pp 105–123
15.
DayG, 1982, “Introduction”, in Diversity and Decomposition in the Local Labour Market Eds DayGCaldwellLJonesKRobbinsDRoseHGower, Aldershot, Hants) pp 1–22
16.
DEm, 1985Employment: The Challenge for the NationDepartment of Employment, Cmnd 9474 (HMSO, London)
17.
DoeringerPPioreM, 1971Internal Labour Markets and Manpower Analysis (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA)
18.
DuncanS SGoodwinM, 1985, “The local state and local economic policy: Why all the fuss?”Policy and Politics13227–253
19.
Financial Times1986, “Workers in safe jobs better paid, says study” 29 July, page 24
20.
GeorgeK DShoreyJ, 1985, “Manual workers, good jobs and structured internal labour markets”British Journal of Industrial Relations23425–447
21.
GoldinC, 1977, “Female labour force participation: The origins of black and white differences, 1870 and 1908”Journal of Economic History3787–108
22.
HumphriesJRuberyJ, 1984, “The reconstitution of the supply side of the labour market: The relative autonomy of social reproduction”Cambridge Journal of Economics8331–346
23.
KerrC, 1954, “The Balkanisation of labour markets”, in Labour Mobility and Economic Opportunity Eds BakkeE WHauserP MMIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 92–110
24.
KreckelR, 1980, “Unequal opportunity structure and labour market segmentation”Sociology14525–550
25.
LoveridgeRMokA, 1976, “Theoretical approaches to segmented labour markets”International Journal of Social Economics7376–411
26.
MayhewK, 1985, “Reforming the labour market”Oxford Review of Economic Policy160–75
27.
McCormickB, 1983, “Housing and unemployment in Great Britain”Oxford Economic Papers35283–305
28.
MilibandK, 1980, “Class war conservatism”New Society52278–280
29.
NEDC, 1985, “Changing working patterns and practices” memorandum (85) 84, National Economic Development Council, 21 Millbank, London SW1P 4QX, mimeo
30.
NEDO, 1986, “Changing patterns of work” report prepared by the Institute of Manpower Studies, National Economic Development Office, 21 Millbank, London SW1P 4QX
31.
OsterG, 1979, “A factor analytic test of the theory of the dual economy”Review of Economics and Statistics6133–39
32.
OstermanP, 1975, “An empirical study of labour market segmentation”Industrial and Labour Relations Review28508–523
33.
PahlR E, 1984Divisions of Labour (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
34.
PickvanceC, 1984, “The structuralist critique in urban studies”, in Cities in Transformation Ed. SmithM PSage, Beverly Hills, CA) pp 31–49
35.
PioreM, 1980, “Dualism as a response to flux and uncertainty”, in Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies Eds BergerSPioreMCambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 23–54
36.
ReichMGordonMEdwardsR, 1973, “A theory of labour market segmentation”American Economic Review63359–365
37.
RosenbergS, 1983, “Reagan social policy and labour force restructuring”Cambridge Journal of Economics7179–196
38.
RyanP, 1981, “Segmentation, duality and the internal labour market”, in The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation Ed. WilkinsonFAcademic Press, London) pp 3–27
39.
SaundersP, 1981Social Theory and the Urban Question (Hutchinson, London)
40.
SayerA, 1982, “Explanation in economic geography: Abstraction versus generalisation”Progress in Human Geography668–88
41.
SpilermanS, 1977, “Careers, labour market structure and socio-economic achievement”American Journal of Sociology83551–593
42.
StolzenbergR M, 1975, “Occupations, labour markets and the process of wage attainment”American Sociological Review40645–665
43.
TolbertC M, 1982, “Industrial segmentation and men's career mobility”American Sociological Review47457–477
44.
TolbertC MHoranP MBeckE M, 1980, “The structure of economic segmentation: A dual economy approach”American Journal of Sociology851095–1116
